Academic Bibliography

Show Sort by

Your filters: cql: parent exact "LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE"

Mark
- journalArticle
- A1
- open access
Splitting and relevance : broadening the scope of Parikh's concepts

Frederik Van De Putte (UGent)

(2016) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 59(234). p.173-205
Mark
- journalArticle
- A1
- open access
The 'green cheese' and 'red herring' problems reconsidered: epistemological versus methodological tasks for philosophers of science

Erik Weber (UGent) , Raoul Gervais (UGent) and Jeroen Van Bouwel (UGent)

(2015) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 231. p.433-455
Mark
Health, food, and science: an ethical assessment of research agendas

Jan De Winter (UGent) and Laszlo Kosolosky (UGent)

(2014) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 57(228). p.701-726
Mark
The hypothesis that saves the day: ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience

Maarten Boudry (UGent)

(2013) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 223. p.245-258
Mark
- journalArticle
- A1
- open access
On the connection between Nonstandard Analysis and Constructive Analysis

Sam Sanders (UGent)

(2013) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 222. p.183-210
Mark
Strong and weak regress arguments

Jan Willem Wieland (UGent)

(2013) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 224. p.439-461
Mark
A contextual type theory with judgemental modalities for reasoning from open assumptions

Giuseppe Primiero (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 220. p.579-600
Mark
Tolerating deontic conflicts by adaptively restricting inheritance

Christian Strasser (UGent) , Mathieu Beirlaen (UGent) and Joke Meheus (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 219. p.477-506
Mark
It might have been classical logic

Diderik Batens (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 218. p.241-279
Mark
- misc
Introduction

Erik Weber (UGent) , Dietlinde Wouters (UGent) and Joke Meheus (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. p.509-511

Academic Bibliography

Splitting and relevance : broadening the scope of Parikh's concepts

The 'green cheese' and 'red herring' problems reconsidered: epistemological versus methodological tasks for philosophers of science

Health, food, and science: an ethical assessment of research agendas

The hypothesis that saves the day: ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience

On the connection between Nonstandard Analysis and Constructive Analysis

Strong and weak regress arguments

A contextual type theory with judgemental modalities for reasoning from open assumptions

Tolerating deontic conflicts by adaptively restricting inheritance

It might have been classical logic

Introduction

Contents

Support

Contact