Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Your filters: cql: issn exact "0024-5836"

Add to list
Strong and weak regress arguments

Jan Willem Wieland (UGent)

(2013) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 224. p.439-461
Add to list
It might have been classical logic

Diderik Batens (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 218. p.241-279
Add to list
Tolerating deontic conflicts by adaptively restricting inheritance

Christian Strasser (UGent) , Mathieu Beirlaen (UGent) and Joke Meheus (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 219. p.477-506
Add to list
A contextual type theory with judgemental modalities for reasoning from open assumptions

Giuseppe Primiero (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 220. p.579-600
Add to list
Extending the standard format of adaptive logics to the prioritized case

Frederik Van De Putte (UGent) and Christian Strasser (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 220. p.601-641
Add to list
- Miscellaneous
Introduction

Erik Weber (UGent) , Dietlinde Wouters and Joke Meheus (UGent)

(2012) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. p.509-511
Add to list
Filling a typical gap in a regress argument

Jan Willem Wieland (UGent)

(2011) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. 54(216). p.589-597
Add to list
- Journal Article
- A1
- open access
Metaphysical explanatory asymmetries

Jan Willem Wieland (UGent) and Erik Weber (UGent)

(2010) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. p.345-365
Add to list
- Journal Article
- A1
- open access
On the Transparency of Defeasible Logics: Equivalent Premise Sets, Equivalence of Their Extensions, and Maximality of the Lower Limit

Diderik Batens (UGent) , Christian Strasser (UGent) and Peter Verdée (UGent)

(2009) Logique et Analyse. p.281-304
Add to list
Conceptual analysis of causation and theoretical utility in everyday contexts

Erik Weber (UGent) and Leen De Vreese (UGent)

(2009) LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE. p.177-190

← Previous

Academic Bibliography

Strong and weak regress arguments

It might have been classical logic

Tolerating deontic conflicts by adaptively restricting inheritance

A contextual type theory with judgemental modalities for reasoning from open assumptions

Extending the standard format of adaptive logics to the prioritized case

Introduction

Filling a typical gap in a regress argument

Metaphysical explanatory asymmetries

On the Transparency of Defeasible Logics: Equivalent Premise Sets, Equivalence of Their Extensions, and Maximality of the Lower Limit

Conceptual analysis of causation and theoretical utility in everyday contexts

Contents

Support

Contact