Advanced search

The choice of detection method could bias Campylobacter testing results, experience with chicken meat preparations

Ihab Habib (UGent) , Imca Sampers (UGent) , Mieke Uyttendaele (UGent) , Dirk Berkvens (UGent) and Lieven De Zutter (UGent)
Author
Organization

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Habib, Ihab, Imca Sampers, Mieke Uyttendaele, Dirk Berkvens, and Lieven De Zutter. 2008. “The Choice of Detection Method Could Bias Campylobacter Testing Results, Experience with Chicken Meat Preparations.” In Food Microbiology, 13th Conference, Abstracts.
APA
Habib, I., Sampers, I., Uyttendaele, M., Berkvens, D., & De Zutter, L. (2008). The choice of detection method could bias Campylobacter testing results, experience with chicken meat preparations. Food Microbiology, 13th Conference, Abstracts. Presented at the 13th Conference on Food Microbiology.
Vancouver
1.
Habib I, Sampers I, Uyttendaele M, Berkvens D, De Zutter L. The choice of detection method could bias Campylobacter testing results, experience with chicken meat preparations. Food Microbiology, 13th Conference, Abstracts. 2008.
MLA
Habib, Ihab, Imca Sampers, Mieke Uyttendaele, et al. “The Choice of Detection Method Could Bias Campylobacter Testing Results, Experience with Chicken Meat Preparations.” Food Microbiology, 13th Conference, Abstracts. 2008. Print.
@inproceedings{952491,
  author       = {Habib, Ihab and Sampers, Imca and Uyttendaele, Mieke and Berkvens, Dirk and De Zutter, Lieven},
  booktitle    = {Food Microbiology, 13th Conference, Abstracts},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Ghent, Belgium},
  title        = {The choice of detection method could bias Campylobacter testing results, experience with chicken meat preparations},
  year         = {2008},
}