Advanced search
1 file | 245.55 KB Add to list

To be or not to be? Are induced pluripotent stem cells babies, and does it matter?

Author
Organization
Abstract
On 23 July 2009, two separate research groups reported the first successful generation of adult mice from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using tetraploid complementation (Kang et al. 2009; Zhao et al., 2009). These experiments are part of ongoing research into the differences and similarities between iPSCs and embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The recent results may raise challenges for those who accept iPSC research but find human ESC research ethically problematic.
Keywords
Ethics, Embryo Research, Moral Status, Potentiality, Induced pluripotent stem cell research

Downloads

  • DevolderEmboRep.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 245.55 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Devolder, Katrien. “To Be or Not to Be? Are Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Babies, and Does It Matter?” European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, vol. 10, no. 12, Nature Publishing Group, 2009, pp. 1285–87, doi:10.1038/embor.2009.244.
APA
Devolder, K. (2009). To be or not to be? Are induced pluripotent stem cells babies, and does it matter? https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.244
Chicago author-date
Devolder, Katrien. 2009. “To Be or Not to Be? Are Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Babies, and Does It Matter?” European Molecular Biology Organization Reports. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.244.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Devolder, Katrien. 2009. “To Be or Not to Be? Are Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Babies, and Does It Matter?” European Molecular Biology Organization Reports. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.244.
Vancouver
1.
Devolder K. To be or not to be? Are induced pluripotent stem cells babies, and does it matter? Vol. 10, European Molecular Biology Organization Reports. Nature Publishing Group; 2009. p. 1285–7.
IEEE
[1]
K. Devolder, “To be or not to be? Are induced pluripotent stem cells babies, and does it matter?,” European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, vol. 10, no. 12. Nature Publishing Group, pp. 1285–1287, 2009.
@misc{884321,
  abstract     = {{On 23 July 2009, two separate research groups reported the first successful generation of adult mice from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using tetraploid complementation (Kang et al. 2009; Zhao et al., 2009). These experiments are part of ongoing research into the differences and similarities between iPSCs and embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The recent results may raise challenges for those who accept iPSC research but find human ESC research ethically problematic.}},
  author       = {{Devolder, Katrien}},
  issn         = {{1469-221X}},
  keywords     = {{Ethics,Embryo Research,Moral Status,Potentiality,Induced pluripotent stem cell research}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{1285--1287}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{European Molecular Biology Organization Reports}},
  title        = {{To be or not to be? Are induced pluripotent stem cells babies, and does it matter?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.244}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2009}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: