Advanced search
2 files | 4.05 MB Add to list

Decoding algorithms : exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders

(2023) DIGITAL JOURNALISM. 11(1). p.203-225
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Algorithmic recommenders are omnipresent in our daily lives. While a multitude of studies focus on how people use algorithmic recommenders, far too little attention has been devoted to how they perceive and understand these complex systems. In this study we focus on Algorithmic News Recommenders (ANR). Drawing on 26 semi-structured interviews, we investigated how laypeople decode Google News and Facebook News. In our method we employ the scroll-back method, make use of visualizations and a double interview design. Our results differentiate between those with a high and low level of understanding. Those with a high level of understanding acknowledged the role of companies and developers in the workings of ANR. Others, who were less cognizant had a more instrumental view and mostly focused on the relation between their individual data disclosed and the ANR. More importantly, in both groups, their feelings (ranging from admiration to frustration) about and everyday inter- actions (both dominant and deviating) with ANR shape their general understanding. In the discussion we argue how it’s necessary for future research endeavors and algorithmic literacy initiatives to be mindful of the interconnection between knowledge, feelings, and interactions to understand layman’s perspectives.
Keywords
Communication

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.44 MB
  • Martens Marijn et al Accepted Manuscript.docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • ZIP archive
    • |
    • 1.61 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Martens, Marijn, et al. “Decoding Algorithms : Exploring End-Users’ Mental Models of the Inner Workings of Algorithmic News Recommenders.” DIGITAL JOURNALISM, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, pp. 203–25, doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2129402.
APA
Martens, M., De Wolf, R., Berendt, B., & De Marez, L. (2023). Decoding algorithms : exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders. DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 11(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2129402
Chicago author-date
Martens, Marijn, Ralf De Wolf, Bettina Berendt, and Lieven De Marez. 2023. “Decoding Algorithms : Exploring End-Users’ Mental Models of the Inner Workings of Algorithmic News Recommenders.” DIGITAL JOURNALISM 11 (1): 203–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2129402.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Martens, Marijn, Ralf De Wolf, Bettina Berendt, and Lieven De Marez. 2023. “Decoding Algorithms : Exploring End-Users’ Mental Models of the Inner Workings of Algorithmic News Recommenders.” DIGITAL JOURNALISM 11 (1): 203–225. doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2129402.
Vancouver
1.
Martens M, De Wolf R, Berendt B, De Marez L. Decoding algorithms : exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders. DIGITAL JOURNALISM. 2023;11(1):203–25.
IEEE
[1]
M. Martens, R. De Wolf, B. Berendt, and L. De Marez, “Decoding algorithms : exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders,” DIGITAL JOURNALISM, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 203–225, 2023.
@article{8772721,
  abstract     = {{Algorithmic recommenders are omnipresent in our daily lives. While a multitude of studies focus on how people use algorithmic recommenders, far too little attention has been devoted to how they perceive and understand these complex systems. In this study we focus on Algorithmic News Recommenders (ANR). Drawing on 26 semi-structured interviews, we investigated how laypeople decode Google News and Facebook News. In our method we employ the scroll-back method, make use of visualizations and a double interview design. Our results differentiate between those with a high and low level of understanding. Those with a high level of understanding acknowledged the role of companies and developers in the workings of ANR. Others, who were less cognizant had a more instrumental view and mostly focused on the relation between their individual data disclosed and the ANR. More importantly, in both groups, their feelings (ranging from admiration to frustration) about and everyday inter- actions (both dominant and deviating) with ANR shape their general understanding. In the discussion we argue how it’s necessary for future research endeavors and algorithmic literacy initiatives to be mindful of the interconnection between knowledge, feelings, and interactions to understand layman’s perspectives.}},
  author       = {{Martens, Marijn and De Wolf, Ralf and Berendt, Bettina and De Marez, Lieven}},
  issn         = {{2167-0811}},
  journal      = {{DIGITAL JOURNALISM}},
  keywords     = {{Communication}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{203--225}},
  title        = {{Decoding algorithms : exploring end-users’ mental models of the inner workings of algorithmic news recommenders}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2129402}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: