Advanced search
2 files | 6.78 MB Add to list

Experimental validation of a numerical model for closed cavity façade glass structural calculation under dynamic cavity temperature, dry air flow and wind loads effects

Author
Organization
Abstract
Closed Cavity Facades (CCF) are a novel trend for high performance double skin facades, providing a valuable benefit in terms of maintenance cost reduction. Current structural codes contain incomplete and conservative assumptions about the wind load sharing design for this type of multiple skin. In addition, in most codes glazing skins are investigated as separated structural glass elements, while it would be more appropriate to consider the structural interaction between the two skins. Indeed, the the CCF structural behaviour key is the air cavity response to wind loads and the way the cavity air supply is regulated in order to preserve low relative humidity. An optimal design of the outer and inner glass skin should take in account the superposition of the actions of wind and dynamic temperature and therefore the variable mass within the cavity. During the last years Ghent University and Permasteelisa have conducted a theoretical investigation and developed an assessment tool for the double skin structural design. The tool has been validated by means of an extensive experimental campaign. Several CCF elements have been exposed to on-site wind loads, solar thermal imposed loads and controlled laboratory quasi static and cyclic loading pressures. As such, the response to the natural climatic loading has been collected as representative of the CCF working conditions during its entire life. This paper is the last of a series of three documents that summarizes the outcomes about the research on the CCF panels. In the first paper the basics of the pressure-equalization model has been discussed and verified, describing in particular the extreme case of a fully closed cavity. In the second paper the permeability functions of the CCF have been derived as fundamental input for the dynamic simulations under variable cavity temperature conditions, which are the major objective of this third and last work. The experimental results and the numerical simulations are demonstrating the need for an improvement of the current codes. In particular, the simulations allow to account for a reliable load-sharing between inner and outer panes, leading to thinner glass panes. Note that this depends strongly on the airtightness levels of inside and outside, and manufacturing airtightness scatter should be accounted for ensuring a robust calculation approach.
Keywords
Building and Construction, Architecture, Civil and Structural Engineering, Double skin, Climatic loads, Wind loads, Load sharing, PRESSURE EQUALIZATION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.63 MB
  • Nathan Van Den Bossche et al Accepted Manuscript.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.15 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Lori, Guido, et al. “Experimental Validation of a Numerical Model for Closed Cavity Façade Glass Structural Calculation under Dynamic Cavity Temperature, Dry Air Flow and Wind Loads Effects.” GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING, vol. 7, no. 3, 2022, pp. 523–45, doi:10.1007/s40940-022-00203-y.
APA
Lori, G., Van den Brande, K., Van Den Bossche, N., De Bleecker, H., & Belis, J. (2022). Experimental validation of a numerical model for closed cavity façade glass structural calculation under dynamic cavity temperature, dry air flow and wind loads effects. GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING, 7(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00203-y
Chicago author-date
Lori, Guido, Kjartan Van den Brande, Nathan Van Den Bossche, Henk De Bleecker, and Jan Belis. 2022. “Experimental Validation of a Numerical Model for Closed Cavity Façade Glass Structural Calculation under Dynamic Cavity Temperature, Dry Air Flow and Wind Loads Effects.” GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING 7 (3): 523–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00203-y.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Lori, Guido, Kjartan Van den Brande, Nathan Van Den Bossche, Henk De Bleecker, and Jan Belis. 2022. “Experimental Validation of a Numerical Model for Closed Cavity Façade Glass Structural Calculation under Dynamic Cavity Temperature, Dry Air Flow and Wind Loads Effects.” GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING 7 (3): 523–545. doi:10.1007/s40940-022-00203-y.
Vancouver
1.
Lori G, Van den Brande K, Van Den Bossche N, De Bleecker H, Belis J. Experimental validation of a numerical model for closed cavity façade glass structural calculation under dynamic cavity temperature, dry air flow and wind loads effects. GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING. 2022;7(3):523–45.
IEEE
[1]
G. Lori, K. Van den Brande, N. Van Den Bossche, H. De Bleecker, and J. Belis, “Experimental validation of a numerical model for closed cavity façade glass structural calculation under dynamic cavity temperature, dry air flow and wind loads effects,” GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 523–545, 2022.
@article{8770447,
  abstract     = {{Closed Cavity Facades (CCF) are a novel trend for high performance double skin facades, providing a valuable benefit in terms of maintenance cost reduction. Current structural codes contain incomplete and conservative assumptions about the wind load sharing design for this type of multiple skin. In addition, in most codes glazing skins are investigated as separated structural glass elements, while it would be more appropriate to consider the structural interaction between the two skins. Indeed, the the CCF structural behaviour key is the air cavity response to wind loads and the way the cavity air supply is regulated in order to preserve low relative humidity. An optimal design of the outer and inner glass skin should take in account the superposition of the actions of wind and dynamic temperature and therefore the variable mass within the cavity. During the last years Ghent University and Permasteelisa have conducted a theoretical investigation and developed an assessment tool for the double skin structural design. The tool has been validated by means of an extensive experimental campaign. Several CCF elements have been exposed to on-site wind loads, solar thermal imposed loads and controlled laboratory quasi static and cyclic loading pressures. As such, the response to the natural climatic loading has been collected as representative of the CCF working conditions during its entire life. This paper is the last of a series of three documents that summarizes the outcomes about the research on the CCF panels. In the first paper the basics of the pressure-equalization model has been discussed and verified, describing in particular the extreme case of a fully closed cavity. In the second paper the permeability functions of the CCF have been derived as fundamental input for the dynamic simulations under variable cavity temperature conditions, which are the major objective of this third and last work. The experimental results and the numerical simulations are demonstrating the need for an improvement of the current codes. In particular, the simulations allow to account for a reliable load-sharing between inner and outer panes, leading to thinner glass panes. Note that this depends strongly on the airtightness levels of inside and outside, and manufacturing airtightness scatter should be accounted for ensuring a robust calculation approach.}},
  author       = {{Lori, Guido and Van den Brande, Kjartan and Van Den Bossche, Nathan and De Bleecker, Henk and Belis, Jan}},
  issn         = {{2363-5142}},
  journal      = {{GLASS STRUCTURES & ENGINEERING}},
  keywords     = {{Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering,Double skin,Climatic loads,Wind loads,Load sharing,PRESSURE EQUALIZATION}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{523--545}},
  title        = {{Experimental validation of a numerical model for closed cavity façade glass structural calculation under dynamic cavity temperature, dry air flow and wind loads effects}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00203-y}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric