Advanced search
1 file | 340.85 KB Add to list

Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe : balancing organised and opportunistic programmes

Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Aims: Cervical cancer (CC) over-screening has been understudied in Europe, yet is relevant for approaching inequalities in screening uptake. Focusing on countries' screening strategies (opportunistic systems versus organised programmes), we assess in which contexts CC over-screening is more prevalent, and which women are more likely to have engaged in cervical cancer screening (CCS) within the past year. Methods: A two-level (multilevel) design among screening women (N = 80,761) nested in 31 European countries was used to analyse data from the second wave (2013-2015) of the European Health Interview Survey. We focused on over-screening, defined as screening more frequently than the three-yearly screening interval prescribed in the European guidelines - that is, having screened within the past year. Results: Higher levels of over-screening were observed in opportunistic systems compared to systems with organised programmes. In opportunistic systems, women with a higher socioeconomic position had a higher likelihood of being screened within the past year than their socioeconomic counterparts. Moreover, these differences diminished under organised programmes. Conclusions: Contexts with organised CCS programmes are more efficiently reducing over-screening, and enforcing the European guidelines. We suggest that the physician-patient relationship is an essential pathway for explaining socioeconomic differences in CC (over-)screening and for future interventions.
Keywords
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Medicine, Cancer screening participation, over-screening, socioeconomic position, screening strategy, physician-patient relationship, Europe, TRENDS

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 340.85 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Prez, Vincent, et al. “Cervical Cancer (over-)Screening in Europe : Balancing Organised and Opportunistic Programmes.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 51, no. 8, 2023, pp. 1239–47, doi:10.1177/14034948221118215.
APA
De Prez, V., Jolidon, V., Cullati, S., Burton-Jeangros, C., & Bracke, P. (2023). Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe : balancing organised and opportunistic programmes. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 51(8), 1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948221118215
Chicago author-date
De Prez, Vincent, Vladimir Jolidon, Stéphane Cullati, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, and Piet Bracke. 2023. “Cervical Cancer (over-)Screening in Europe : Balancing Organised and Opportunistic Programmes.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 51 (8): 1239–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948221118215.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Prez, Vincent, Vladimir Jolidon, Stéphane Cullati, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, and Piet Bracke. 2023. “Cervical Cancer (over-)Screening in Europe : Balancing Organised and Opportunistic Programmes.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 51 (8): 1239–1247. doi:10.1177/14034948221118215.
Vancouver
1.
De Prez V, Jolidon V, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C, Bracke P. Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe : balancing organised and opportunistic programmes. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 2023;51(8):1239–47.
IEEE
[1]
V. De Prez, V. Jolidon, S. Cullati, C. Burton-Jeangros, and P. Bracke, “Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe : balancing organised and opportunistic programmes,” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1239–1247, 2023.
@article{8766988,
  abstract     = {{Aims: Cervical cancer (CC) over-screening has been understudied in Europe, yet is relevant for approaching inequalities in screening uptake. Focusing on countries' screening strategies (opportunistic systems versus organised programmes), we assess in which contexts CC over-screening is more prevalent, and which women are more likely to have engaged in cervical cancer screening (CCS) within the past year. Methods: A two-level (multilevel) design among screening women (N = 80,761) nested in 31 European countries was used to analyse data from the second wave (2013-2015) of the European Health Interview Survey. We focused on over-screening, defined as screening more frequently than the three-yearly screening interval prescribed in the European guidelines - that is, having screened within the past year. Results: Higher levels of over-screening were observed in opportunistic systems compared to systems with organised programmes. In opportunistic systems, women with a higher socioeconomic position had a higher likelihood of being screened within the past year than their socioeconomic counterparts. Moreover, these differences diminished under organised programmes. Conclusions: Contexts with organised CCS programmes are more efficiently reducing over-screening, and enforcing the European guidelines. We suggest that the physician-patient relationship is an essential pathway for explaining socioeconomic differences in CC (over-)screening and for future interventions.}},
  author       = {{De Prez, Vincent and Jolidon, Vladimir and Cullati, Stéphane and Burton-Jeangros, Claudine and Bracke, Piet}},
  issn         = {{1403-4948}},
  journal      = {{SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH}},
  keywords     = {{Public Health,Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine,Cancer screening participation,over-screening,socioeconomic position,screening strategy,physician-patient relationship,Europe,TRENDS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{1239--1247}},
  title        = {{Cervical cancer (over-)screening in Europe : balancing organised and opportunistic programmes}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1177/14034948221118215}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: