Advanced search
1 file | 3.24 MB Add to list

A completely digital workflow for nanoceramic endocrowns : a 5-year prospective study

Valentin Vervack (UGent) , Filip Keulemans (UGent) , Geert Hommez (UGent) , Hugo De Bruyn (UGent) and Stefan Vandeweghe (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the success of monolithic endocrowns fabricated using a digital workflow. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients requiring restoration of devitalized molars or premolars were included in the study. The preparation was scanned using an intraoral scanner (Cerec Bluecam, Dentsply Sirona), and a monolithic restoration was made from a nanoparticle resin-based hybrid composite (#10 Cerasmart [CS]; #10 Lava Ultimate [LU], 3M Espe) or a polymer-infiltrated ceramic (#10 Vita Enamic [VE]). At the time of placement and after 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years of function, radiographs were taken to evaluate the marginal integrity of the restorations, and clinical pictures were taken to assess the quality of the restoration using the USPHS criteria. Results: After 5 years, the restorative success rate was 70.8%, the restorative survival rate was 87.5%, and the tooth survival was 91.6%. Four chippings (two LU, two CS), three fractures (three LU), and two debonding of the restorations (two CS) occurred. Also, two teeth were extracted after 5 years of follow-up (two VE) because of secondary caries and a root fracture. The USPHS ratings were high, except for color match, which was rated the lowest at all time intervals. Conclusion: Nanoceramic endocrowns made using a completely digital workflow have an acceptable survival rate after 5 years. However, the complication rate was high.

Downloads

  • download-mm ijp-7545-blind-6.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 3.24 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vervack, Valentin, et al. “A Completely Digital Workflow for Nanoceramic Endocrowns : A 5-Year Prospective Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, vol. 35, no. 3, 2022, pp. 259–68, doi:10.11607/ijp.7545.
APA
Vervack, V., Keulemans, F., Hommez, G., De Bruyn, H., & Vandeweghe, S. (2022). A completely digital workflow for nanoceramic endocrowns : a 5-year prospective study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 35(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7545
Chicago author-date
Vervack, Valentin, Filip Keulemans, Geert Hommez, Hugo De Bruyn, and Stefan Vandeweghe. 2022. “A Completely Digital Workflow for Nanoceramic Endocrowns : A 5-Year Prospective Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS 35 (3): 259–68. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7545.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vervack, Valentin, Filip Keulemans, Geert Hommez, Hugo De Bruyn, and Stefan Vandeweghe. 2022. “A Completely Digital Workflow for Nanoceramic Endocrowns : A 5-Year Prospective Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS 35 (3): 259–268. doi:10.11607/ijp.7545.
Vancouver
1.
Vervack V, Keulemans F, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S. A completely digital workflow for nanoceramic endocrowns : a 5-year prospective study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS. 2022;35(3):259–68.
IEEE
[1]
V. Vervack, F. Keulemans, G. Hommez, H. De Bruyn, and S. Vandeweghe, “A completely digital workflow for nanoceramic endocrowns : a 5-year prospective study,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 2022.
@article{8761632,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: To evaluate the success of monolithic endocrowns fabricated using a digital workflow. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients requiring restoration of devitalized molars or premolars were included in the study. The preparation was scanned using an intraoral scanner (Cerec Bluecam, Dentsply Sirona), and a monolithic restoration was made from a nanoparticle resin-based hybrid composite (#10 Cerasmart [CS]; #10 Lava Ultimate [LU], 3M Espe) or a polymer-infiltrated ceramic (#10 Vita Enamic [VE]). At the time of placement and after 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years of function, radiographs were taken to evaluate the marginal integrity of the restorations, and clinical pictures were taken to assess the quality of the restoration using the USPHS criteria. Results: After 5 years, the restorative success rate was 70.8%, the restorative survival rate was 87.5%, and the tooth survival was 91.6%. Four chippings (two LU, two CS), three fractures (three LU), and two debonding of the restorations (two CS) occurred. Also, two teeth were extracted after 5 years of follow-up (two VE) because of secondary caries and a root fracture. The USPHS ratings were high, except for color match, which was rated the lowest at all time intervals. Conclusion: Nanoceramic endocrowns made using a completely digital workflow have an acceptable survival rate after 5 years. However, the complication rate was high.}},
  author       = {{Vervack, Valentin and Keulemans, Filip and Hommez, Geert and De Bruyn, Hugo and Vandeweghe, Stefan}},
  issn         = {{0893-2174}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{259--268}},
  title        = {{A completely digital workflow for nanoceramic endocrowns : a 5-year prospective study}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7545}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: