Advanced search
1 file | 1.00 MB Add to list

Clinical research on the use of bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds : a systematic review of reported outcomes and applied measurement instruments

(2022) JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY. 31(3). p.514-522
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this review article was to identify reported outcomes and measurement instruments used in clinical research on bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched using a combination of key terms including; wounds, bordered foam dressing, and treatment. Studies were included if they (1) targeted an adult population, (2) addressed the treatment of complex wounds with a bordered foam dressing as the primary wound dressing, (3) were retrieved from original research, and (4) were published between 2000 and 2022. There were no re-strictions on language or study design. Studies that focused primarily on the prevention of complex wounds were excluded. Data extraction included outcome domains, outcomes, instruments, time points, and outcome mea-sures. The OMERACT Filter 2.0 was used as a conceptual framework for the extraction of outcomes.Results: A total of 24 outcome domains and 82 outcomes were identified. The outcomes were categorised into five core areas: (1) impact on life, (2) dressing performance, (3) pathophysiological manifestations, (4) resource use, and (5) adverse events. Thirtynine outcomes (47.0%) were measured at more than one time point. The most frequently reported time point was 'at the end of treatment' (62.7%). Outcomes were measured using self-report instruments, clinical observations, and bio-physiological instruments.Conclusion: This systematic review identified reported outcomes and measurement instruments in research on bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds. The variety and lack of consistency in terms of instruments, time points and outcome measurements made it difficult to compare data directly across different reported studies. A solution to the variety in outcome reporting across studies in complex wound care, and moreover for the treatment with bordered foam dressings, is the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS). The outcomes in this review article will inform the next steps of developing a COS, where patients, clinicians and researchers will be involved to decide on the final outcomes included in a COS for the treatment of complex wounds with bordered foam dressings.
Keywords
Dermatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Core outcome set, Systematic review, Bordered foam dressings, Treatment, Complex wounds

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.00 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Raepsaet, Charlotte, et al. “Clinical Research on the Use of Bordered Foam Dressings in the Treatment of Complex Wounds : A Systematic Review of Reported Outcomes and Applied Measurement Instruments.” JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, vol. 31, no. 3, 2022, pp. 514–22, doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2022.05.005.
APA
Raepsaet, C., Alves, P., Cullen, B., Gefen, A., Lázaro-Martínez, J. L., Lev-Tov, H., … Beeckman, D. (2022). Clinical research on the use of bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds : a systematic review of reported outcomes and applied measurement instruments. JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 31(3), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.05.005
Chicago author-date
Raepsaet, Charlotte, Paulo Alves, Breda Cullen, Amit Gefen, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez, Hadar Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, et al. 2022. “Clinical Research on the Use of Bordered Foam Dressings in the Treatment of Complex Wounds : A Systematic Review of Reported Outcomes and Applied Measurement Instruments.” JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY 31 (3): 514–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.05.005.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Raepsaet, Charlotte, Paulo Alves, Breda Cullen, Amit Gefen, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez, Hadar Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, Nick Santamaria, Andrew Sharpe, Terry Swanson, Kevin Woo, and Dimitri Beeckman. 2022. “Clinical Research on the Use of Bordered Foam Dressings in the Treatment of Complex Wounds : A Systematic Review of Reported Outcomes and Applied Measurement Instruments.” JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY 31 (3): 514–522. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2022.05.005.
Vancouver
1.
Raepsaet C, Alves P, Cullen B, Gefen A, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Lev-Tov H, et al. Clinical research on the use of bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds : a systematic review of reported outcomes and applied measurement instruments. JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY. 2022;31(3):514–22.
IEEE
[1]
C. Raepsaet et al., “Clinical research on the use of bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds : a systematic review of reported outcomes and applied measurement instruments,” JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 514–522, 2022.
@article{8753915,
  abstract     = {{Objective: The aim of this review article was to identify reported outcomes and measurement instruments used in clinical research on bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched using a combination of key terms including; wounds, bordered foam dressing, and treatment. Studies were included if they (1) targeted an adult population, (2) addressed the treatment of complex wounds with a bordered foam dressing as the primary wound dressing, (3) were retrieved from original research, and (4) were published between 2000 and 2022. There were no re-strictions on language or study design. Studies that focused primarily on the prevention of complex wounds were excluded. Data extraction included outcome domains, outcomes, instruments, time points, and outcome mea-sures. The OMERACT Filter 2.0 was used as a conceptual framework for the extraction of outcomes.Results: A total of 24 outcome domains and 82 outcomes were identified. The outcomes were categorised into five core areas: (1) impact on life, (2) dressing performance, (3) pathophysiological manifestations, (4) resource use, and (5) adverse events. Thirtynine outcomes (47.0%) were measured at more than one time point. The most frequently reported time point was 'at the end of treatment' (62.7%). Outcomes were measured using self-report instruments, clinical observations, and bio-physiological instruments.Conclusion: This systematic review identified reported outcomes and measurement instruments in research on bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds. The variety and lack of consistency in terms of instruments, time points and outcome measurements made it difficult to compare data directly across different reported studies. A solution to the variety in outcome reporting across studies in complex wound care, and moreover for the treatment with bordered foam dressings, is the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS). The outcomes in this review article will inform the next steps of developing a COS, where patients, clinicians and researchers will be involved to decide on the final outcomes included in a COS for the treatment of complex wounds with bordered foam dressings.}},
  author       = {{Raepsaet, Charlotte and Alves, Paulo and Cullen, Breda and Gefen, Amit and Lázaro-Martínez, José Luis and Lev-Tov, Hadar and Najafi, Bijan and Santamaria, Nick and Sharpe, Andrew and Swanson, Terry and Woo, Kevin and Beeckman, Dimitri}},
  issn         = {{0965-206X}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY}},
  keywords     = {{Dermatology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Core outcome set,Systematic review,Bordered foam dressings,Treatment,Complex wounds}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{514--522}},
  title        = {{Clinical research on the use of bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds : a systematic review of reported outcomes and applied measurement instruments}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.05.005}},
  volume       = {{31}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: