@article{8752644,
  abstract     = {{Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help adolescents adopt healthy lifestyles. However, attrition in these interventions is high. Overall, there is a lack of research on nonusage attrition in adolescents, particularly regarding the role of socioeconomic status (SES).

Objective: The aim of this study was to focus on the role of SES in the following three research questions (RQs): When do adolescents stop using an mHealth intervention (RQ1)? Why do they report nonusage attrition (RQ2)? Which intervention components (ie, self-regulation component, narrative, and chatbot) prevent nonusage attrition among adolescents (RQ3)?

Methods: A total of 186 Flemish adolescents (aged 12-15 years) participated in a 12-week mHealth program. Log data were monitored to measure nonusage attrition and usage duration for the 3 intervention components. A web-based questionnaire was administered to assess reasons for attrition. A survival analysis was conducted to estimate the time to attrition and determine whether this differed according to SES (RQ1). Descriptive statistics were performed to map the attrition reasons, and Fisher exact tests were used to determine if these reasons differed depending on the educational track (RQ2). Mixed effects Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the associations between the use duration of the 3 components during the first week and attrition. An interaction term was added to the regression models to determine whether associations differed by the educational track (RQ3).

Results: After 12 weeks, 95.7% (178/186) of the participants stopped using the app. 30.1% (56/186) of the adolescents only opened the app on the installation day, and 44.1% (82/186) stopped using the app in the first week. Attrition at any given time during the intervention period was higher for adolescents from the nonacademic educational track compared with those from the academic track. The other SES indicators (family affluence and perceived financial situation) did not explain attrition. The most common reasons for nonusage attrition among participants were perceiving that the app did not lead to behavior change, not liking the app, thinking that they already had a sufficiently healthy lifestyle, using other apps, and not being motivated by the environment. Attrition reasons did not differ depending on the educational track. More time spent in the self-regulation and narrative components during the first week was associated with lower attrition, whereas chatbot use duration was not associated with attrition rates. No moderating effects of SES were observed in the latter association.

Conclusions: Nonusage attrition was high, especially among adolescents in the nonacademic educational track. The reported reasons for attrition were diverse, with no statistical differences according to the educational level. The duration of the use of the self-regulation and narrative components during the first week may prevent attrition for both educational tracks.}},
  articleno    = {{e36404}},
  author       = {{Maenhout, Laura and Peuters, Carmen and Cardon, Greet and Crombez, Geert and DeSmet, Ann and Compernolle, Sofie}},
  issn         = {{2291-5222}},
  journal      = {{JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH}},
  keywords     = {{Health Informatics,Ghent University,Watersportlaan 2,mHealth,nonusage attrition,adolescents,socioeconomic status,mobile phone,IMPROVE PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY,FAMILY AFFLUENCE SCALE,HEALTH BEHAVIOR,MENTAL-HEALTH,YOUNG-PEOPLE,INEQUALITIES,INDICATORS,PREVENTION,CHILDREN}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{19}},
  title        = {{Nonusage attrition of adolescents in an mHealth promotion intervention and the role of socioeconomic status : secondary analysis of a 2-arm cluster-controlled trial}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.2196/36404}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: