Advanced search
2 files | 852.63 KB Add to list

Inequality in volunteering : building a new research front

(2022) VOLUNTAS. 33(1). p.1-17
Author
Organization
Abstract
Volunteering research focuses predominantly on predicting participation in volunteering, proceeding from the quasi-hegemonic foundation of resource theory and dominant-status theory. Empirical research in this tradition has provided extremely robust evidence that dominant groups in society are more likely to volunteer. At the same time, it has reinforced the status quo in the production of knowledge on volunteering, thereby neglecting the clear problematic of "inequality in volunteering." Compared to the guiding question of "participation," the concept of "inequality" can generate a more variegated, critical, and change-oriented research agenda. With this special issue, we aim to build a "new research front" in the field of volunteering. In this introduction, we advance a novel research agenda structured around a multidimensional understanding of inequality, concomitantly delineating four central research programs focusing on (a) resources, (b) interactions, (c) governmentalities, and (d) epistemologies. We discuss the focus of these lines of research in greater detail with respect to inequality in volunteering, their main critique of dominant research on participation in volunteering, and key elements of the new research agenda.
Keywords
Strategy and Management, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Business and International Management, Volunteering, Social theory, Inequality in volunteering, Resource inequality, Interaction-based inequality, Governmentalities of volunteering, Epistemic inequality, VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION PARTICIPATION, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, ETHNOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE, INCOME INEQUALITY, SOCIAL-INEQUALITY, WORK, DETERMINANTS, CITIZENSHIP, COLONIALITY, NONPROFIT

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 378.52 KB
  • Hustinx et al 2022 Inequality in volunteering Voluntas UGent Institutional Repository.doc
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • application/msword
    • |
    • 474.11 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hustinx, Lesley, et al. “Inequality in Volunteering : Building a New Research Front.” VOLUNTAS, vol. 33, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–17, doi:10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w.
APA
Hustinx, L., Grubb, A., Rameder, P., & Shachar, I. (2022). Inequality in volunteering : building a new research front. VOLUNTAS, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w
Chicago author-date
Hustinx, Lesley, Ane Grubb, Paul Rameder, and Itamar Shachar. 2022. “Inequality in Volunteering : Building a New Research Front.” VOLUNTAS 33 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hustinx, Lesley, Ane Grubb, Paul Rameder, and Itamar Shachar. 2022. “Inequality in Volunteering : Building a New Research Front.” VOLUNTAS 33 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w.
Vancouver
1.
Hustinx L, Grubb A, Rameder P, Shachar I. Inequality in volunteering : building a new research front. VOLUNTAS. 2022;33(1):1–17.
IEEE
[1]
L. Hustinx, A. Grubb, P. Rameder, and I. Shachar, “Inequality in volunteering : building a new research front,” VOLUNTAS, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022.
@article{8750389,
  abstract     = {{Volunteering research focuses predominantly on predicting participation in volunteering, proceeding from the quasi-hegemonic foundation of resource theory and dominant-status theory. Empirical research in this tradition has provided extremely robust evidence that dominant groups in society are more likely to volunteer. At the same time, it has reinforced the status quo in the production of knowledge on volunteering, thereby neglecting the clear problematic of "inequality in volunteering." Compared to the guiding question of "participation," the concept of "inequality" can generate a more variegated, critical, and change-oriented research agenda. With this special issue, we aim to build a "new research front" in the field of volunteering. In this introduction, we advance a novel research agenda structured around a multidimensional understanding of inequality, concomitantly delineating four central research programs focusing on (a) resources, (b) interactions, (c) governmentalities, and (d) epistemologies. We discuss the focus of these lines of research in greater detail with respect to inequality in volunteering, their main critique of dominant research on participation in volunteering, and key elements of the new research agenda.}},
  author       = {{Hustinx, Lesley and Grubb, Ane and Rameder, Paul and Shachar, Itamar}},
  issn         = {{0957-8765}},
  journal      = {{VOLUNTAS}},
  keywords     = {{Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Business and International Management,Volunteering,Social theory,Inequality in volunteering,Resource inequality,Interaction-based inequality,Governmentalities of volunteering,Epistemic inequality,VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION PARTICIPATION,CIVIC ENGAGEMENT,ETHNOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE,INCOME INEQUALITY,SOCIAL-INEQUALITY,WORK,DETERMINANTS,CITIZENSHIP,COLONIALITY,NONPROFIT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  title        = {{Inequality in volunteering : building a new research front}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w}},
  volume       = {{33}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: