Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge
- Author
- Natalie Lorent, Yannick Vande Weygaerde (UGent) , Eveline Claeys, Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo, Nicolas De Vos, Walter De Wever, Bihiyga Salhi (UGent) , Iwein Gyselinck, Cedric Bosteels (UGent) , Bart Lambrecht (UGent) , Stephanie Everaerts, Sven Verschraegen (UGent) , Christophe Schepers, Heleen Demeyer (UGent) , Arne Heyns, Pieter Depuydt (UGent) , Sandra Oeyen (UGent) , Pascal Van Bleyenbergh, Laurent Godinas, Lieven Dupont, Greet Hermans, Eric Derom (UGent) , Rik Gosselink, Wim Janssens and Eva Van Braeckel (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- Background Long-term outcome data of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors are needed to understand their recovery trajectory and additional care needs. Methods A prospective observational multicentre cohort study was carried out of adults hospitalised with COVID-19 from March through May 2020. Workup at 3 and 12 months following admission consisted of clinical review, pulmonary function testing, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), muscle strength, chest computed tomography (CT) and quality of life questionnaires. We evaluated factors correlating with recovery by linear mixed effects modelling. Results Of 695 patients admitted, 299 and 226 returned at 3 and 12 months, respectively (median age 59 years, 69% male, 31% severe disease). About half and a third of the patients reported fatigue, dyspnoea and/or cognitive impairment at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Reduced 6MWD and quadriceps strength were present in 20% and 60% at 3 months versus 7% and 30% at 12 months. A high anxiety score and body mass index correlated with poor functional recovery. At 3 months, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and total lung capacity were below the lower limit of normal in 35% and 18%, decreasing to 21% and 16% at 12 months; predictors of poor DLCO recovery were female sex, pre-existing lung disease, smoking and disease severity. Chest CT improved over time; 10% presented non-progressive fibrotic changes at 1 year. Conclusion Many COVID-19 survivors, especially those with severe disease, experienced limitations at 3 months. At 1 year, the majority showed improvement to almost complete recovery. To identify additional care or rehabilitation needs, we recommend a timely multidisciplinary follow-up visit following COVID-19 admission.
- Keywords
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, MUSCLE STRENGTH
Downloads
-
2022 Lorent Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 859.26 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8749691
- MLA
- Lorent, Natalie, et al. “Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation of Hospitalised COVID-19 Survivors 3 and 12 Months after Discharge.” ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022, doi:10.1183/23120541.00004-2022.
- APA
- Lorent, N., Vande Weygaerde, Y., Claeys, E., Guler Caamano Fajardo, I., De Vos, N., De Wever, W., … Van Braeckel, E. (2022). Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00004-2022
- Chicago author-date
- Lorent, Natalie, Yannick Vande Weygaerde, Eveline Claeys, Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo, Nicolas De Vos, Walter De Wever, Bihiyga Salhi, et al. 2022. “Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation of Hospitalised COVID-19 Survivors 3 and 12 Months after Discharge.” ERJ OPEN RESEARCH 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00004-2022.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Lorent, Natalie, Yannick Vande Weygaerde, Eveline Claeys, Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo, Nicolas De Vos, Walter De Wever, Bihiyga Salhi, Iwein Gyselinck, Cedric Bosteels, Bart Lambrecht, Stephanie Everaerts, Sven Verschraegen, Christophe Schepers, Heleen Demeyer, Arne Heyns, Pieter Depuydt, Sandra Oeyen, Pascal Van Bleyenbergh, Laurent Godinas, Lieven Dupont, Greet Hermans, Eric Derom, Rik Gosselink, Wim Janssens, and Eva Van Braeckel. 2022. “Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation of Hospitalised COVID-19 Survivors 3 and 12 Months after Discharge.” ERJ OPEN RESEARCH 8 (2). doi:10.1183/23120541.00004-2022.
- Vancouver
- 1.Lorent N, Vande Weygaerde Y, Claeys E, Guler Caamano Fajardo I, De Vos N, De Wever W, et al. Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH. 2022;8(2).
- IEEE
- [1]N. Lorent et al., “Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge,” ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022.
@article{8749691,
abstract = {{Background Long-term outcome data of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors are needed to understand their recovery trajectory and additional care needs.
Methods A prospective observational multicentre cohort study was carried out of adults hospitalised with COVID-19 from March through May 2020. Workup at 3 and 12 months following admission consisted of clinical review, pulmonary function testing, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), muscle strength, chest computed tomography (CT) and quality of life questionnaires. We evaluated factors correlating with recovery by linear mixed effects modelling.
Results Of 695 patients admitted, 299 and 226 returned at 3 and 12 months, respectively (median age 59 years, 69% male, 31% severe disease). About half and a third of the patients reported fatigue, dyspnoea and/or cognitive impairment at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Reduced 6MWD and quadriceps strength were present in 20% and 60% at 3 months versus 7% and 30% at 12 months. A high anxiety score and body mass index correlated with poor functional recovery. At 3 months, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and total lung capacity were below the lower limit of normal in 35% and 18%, decreasing to 21% and 16% at 12 months; predictors of poor DLCO recovery were female sex, pre-existing lung disease, smoking and disease severity. Chest CT improved over time; 10% presented non-progressive fibrotic changes at 1 year.
Conclusion Many COVID-19 survivors, especially those with severe disease, experienced limitations at 3 months. At 1 year, the majority showed improvement to almost complete recovery. To identify additional care or rehabilitation needs, we recommend a timely multidisciplinary follow-up visit following COVID-19 admission.}},
articleno = {{4}},
author = {{Lorent, Natalie and Vande Weygaerde, Yannick and Claeys, Eveline and Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek and De Vos, Nicolas and De Wever, Walter and Salhi, Bihiyga and Gyselinck, Iwein and Bosteels, Cedric and Lambrecht, Bart and Everaerts, Stephanie and Verschraegen, Sven and Schepers, Christophe and Demeyer, Heleen and Heyns, Arne and Depuydt, Pieter and Oeyen, Sandra and Van Bleyenbergh, Pascal and Godinas, Laurent and Dupont, Lieven and Hermans, Greet and Derom, Eric and Gosselink, Rik and Janssens, Wim and Van Braeckel, Eva}},
issn = {{2312-0541}},
journal = {{ERJ OPEN RESEARCH}},
keywords = {{Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,MUSCLE STRENGTH}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{15}},
title = {{Prospective longitudinal evaluation of hospitalised COVID-19 survivors 3 and 12 months after discharge}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00004-2022}},
volume = {{8}},
year = {{2022}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: