Advanced search
1 file | 591.41 KB Add to list

Variations in end‐of‐life care practices in older critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe

(2022) JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. 292(3). p.438-449
Author
Organization
Abstract
Background Previous studies reported regional differences in end-of-life care (EoLC) for critically ill patients in Europe. Objectives The purpose of this post-hoc analysis of the prospective multicentre COVIP study was to investigate variations in EoLC practices among older patients in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Methods A total of 3105 critically ill patients aged 70 years and older were enrolled in this study (Central Europe: n = 1573; Northern Europe: n = 821; Southern Europe: n = 711). Generalised estimation equations were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to population averages. Data were adjusted for patient-specific variables (demographic, disease-specific) and health economic data (gross domestic product, health expenditure per capita). The primary outcome was any treatment limitation, and 90-day mortality was a secondary outcome. Results The frequency of the primary endpoint (treatment limitation) was highest in Northern Europe (48%), intermediate in Central Europe (39%) and lowest in Southern Europe (24%). The likelihood for treatment limitations was lower in Southern than in Central Europe (aOR 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.73; p = 0.004), even after multivariable adjustment, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed between Northern and Central Europe (aOR 0.57; 95%CI 0.27-1.22; p = 0.15). After multivariable adjustment, no statistically relevant mortality differences were found between Northern and Central Europe (aOR 1.29; 95%CI 0.80-2.09; p = 0.30) or between Southern and Central Europe (aOR 1.07; 95%CI 0.66-1.73; p = 0.78). Conclusion This study shows a north-to-south gradient in rates of treatment limitation in Europe, highlighting the heterogeneity of EoLC practices across countries. However, mortality rates were not affected by these results.
Keywords
Internal Medicine, COVID-19, critical care, frail elderly, public health systems research, resuscitation orders, ICU, FRAILTY

Downloads

  • published.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 591.41 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Wernly, Bernhard, et al. “Variations in End‐of‐life Care Practices in Older Critically Ill Patients with COVID‐19 in Europe.” JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, vol. 292, no. 3, 2022, pp. 438–49, doi:10.1111/joim.13492.
APA
Wernly, B., Rezar, R., Flaatten, H., Beil, M., Fjølner, J., Bruno, R. R., … Jung, C. (2022). Variations in end‐of‐life care practices in older critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 292(3), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13492
Chicago author-date
Wernly, Bernhard, Richard Rezar, Hans Flaatten, Michael Beil, Jesper Fjølner, Raphael Romano Bruno, Antonio Artigas, et al. 2022. “Variations in End‐of‐life Care Practices in Older Critically Ill Patients with COVID‐19 in Europe.” JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 292 (3): 438–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13492.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Wernly, Bernhard, Richard Rezar, Hans Flaatten, Michael Beil, Jesper Fjølner, Raphael Romano Bruno, Antonio Artigas, Bernardo Bollen Pinto, Joerg C. Schefold, Malte Kelm, Sviri Sigal, Peter Vernon Heerden, Wojciech Szczeklik, Muhammed Elhadi, Michael Joannidis, Sandra Oeyen, Georg Wolff, Brian Marsh, Finn H. Andersen, Rui Moreno, Susannah Leaver, Sarah Wernly, Ariane Boumendil, Dylan W. De Lange, Bertrand Guidet, and Christian Jung. 2022. “Variations in End‐of‐life Care Practices in Older Critically Ill Patients with COVID‐19 in Europe.” JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 292 (3): 438–449. doi:10.1111/joim.13492.
Vancouver
1.
Wernly B, Rezar R, Flaatten H, Beil M, Fjølner J, Bruno RR, et al. Variations in end‐of‐life care practices in older critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. 2022;292(3):438–49.
IEEE
[1]
B. Wernly et al., “Variations in end‐of‐life care practices in older critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe,” JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, vol. 292, no. 3, pp. 438–449, 2022.
@article{8749685,
  abstract     = {{Background Previous studies reported regional differences in end-of-life care (EoLC) for critically ill patients in Europe. Objectives The purpose of this post-hoc analysis of the prospective multicentre COVIP study was to investigate variations in EoLC practices among older patients in intensive care units during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Methods A total of 3105 critically ill patients aged 70 years and older were enrolled in this study (Central Europe: n = 1573; Northern Europe: n = 821; Southern Europe: n = 711). Generalised estimation equations were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to population averages. Data were adjusted for patient-specific variables (demographic, disease-specific) and health economic data (gross domestic product, health expenditure per capita). The primary outcome was any treatment limitation, and 90-day mortality was a secondary outcome. Results The frequency of the primary endpoint (treatment limitation) was highest in Northern Europe (48%), intermediate in Central Europe (39%) and lowest in Southern Europe (24%). The likelihood for treatment limitations was lower in Southern than in Central Europe (aOR 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.73; p = 0.004), even after multivariable adjustment, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed between Northern and Central Europe (aOR 0.57; 95%CI 0.27-1.22; p = 0.15). After multivariable adjustment, no statistically relevant mortality differences were found between Northern and Central Europe (aOR 1.29; 95%CI 0.80-2.09; p = 0.30) or between Southern and Central Europe (aOR 1.07; 95%CI 0.66-1.73; p = 0.78). Conclusion This study shows a north-to-south gradient in rates of treatment limitation in Europe, highlighting the heterogeneity of EoLC practices across countries. However, mortality rates were not affected by these results.}},
  author       = {{Wernly, Bernhard and Rezar, Richard and Flaatten, Hans and Beil, Michael and Fjølner, Jesper and Bruno, Raphael Romano and Artigas, Antonio and Pinto, Bernardo Bollen and Schefold, Joerg C. and Kelm, Malte and Sigal, Sviri and Heerden, Peter Vernon and Szczeklik, Wojciech and Elhadi, Muhammed and Joannidis, Michael and Oeyen, Sandra and Wolff, Georg and Marsh, Brian and Andersen, Finn H. and Moreno, Rui and Leaver, Susannah and Wernly, Sarah and Boumendil, Ariane and De Lange, Dylan W. and Guidet, Bertrand and Jung, Christian}},
  issn         = {{0954-6820}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE}},
  keywords     = {{Internal Medicine,COVID-19,critical care,frail elderly,public health systems research,resuscitation orders,ICU,FRAILTY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{438--449}},
  title        = {{Variations in end‐of‐life care practices in older critically ill patients with COVID‐19 in Europe}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13492}},
  volume       = {{292}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: