- Author
- Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment on the protection of minors when giving an interview on television, without prior parental control. It found that the domestic courts had failed to protect a young girl’s private life as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), emphasizing the particular vulnerability of young persons in such a context and the lack of prior consent by the parents, relatives or teachers. In particular the ECtHR came to the conclusion that the domestic courts had only superficially balanced the question of the young girl’s right to private life (Article 8 ECHR) and the broadcaster’s right to freedom expression (Article 10 ECHR).
- Keywords
- Freedom of expression, broadcast, interview with minors, prior consent, protection of privacy, television, protection of minors
Downloads
-
IRIS.2022.4.IVTRomania.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 51.11 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8749283
- MLA
- Voorhoof, Dirk. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 2022–4, 2022.
- APA
- Voorhoof, D. (2022). European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.
- Chicago author-date
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2022. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE).
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2022. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE).
- Vancouver
- 1.Voorhoof D. European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania. IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE). 2022.
- IEEE
- [1]D. Voorhoof, “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania,” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 2022–4. 2022.
@misc{8749283, abstract = {{The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment on the protection of minors when giving an interview on television, without prior parental control. It found that the domestic courts had failed to protect a young girl’s private life as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), emphasizing the particular vulnerability of young persons in such a context and the lack of prior consent by the parents, relatives or teachers. In particular the ECtHR came to the conclusion that the domestic courts had only superficially balanced the question of the young girl’s right to private life (Article 8 ECHR) and the broadcaster’s right to freedom expression (Article 10 ECHR).}}, articleno = {{2022-4:1/19}}, author = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}}, issn = {{2078-6158}}, keywords = {{Freedom of expression,broadcast,interview with minors,prior consent,protection of privacy,television,protection of minors}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2022-4}}, pages = {{2}}, series = {{IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE)}}, title = {{European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania}}, year = {{2022}}, }