Advanced search
1 file | 51.11 KB Add to list

European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania

Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment on the protection of minors when giving an interview on television, without prior parental control. It found that the domestic courts had failed to protect a young girl’s private life as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), emphasizing the particular vulnerability of young persons in such a context and the lack of prior consent by the parents, relatives or teachers. In particular the ECtHR came to the conclusion that the domestic courts had only superficially balanced the question of the young girl’s right to private life (Article 8 ECHR) and the broadcaster’s right to freedom expression (Article 10 ECHR).
Keywords
Freedom of expression, broadcast, interview with minors, prior consent, protection of privacy, television, protection of minors

Downloads

  • IRIS.2022.4.IVTRomania.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 51.11 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Voorhoof, Dirk. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 2022–4, 2022.
APA
Voorhoof, D. (2022). European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.
Chicago author-date
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2022. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2022. “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE).
Vancouver
1.
Voorhoof D. European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania. IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE). 2022.
IEEE
[1]
D. Voorhoof, “European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania,” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 2022–4. 2022.
@misc{8749283,
  abstract     = {{The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a judgment on the protection of minors when giving an interview on television, without prior parental control. It found that the domestic courts had failed to protect a young girl’s private life as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), emphasizing the particular vulnerability of young persons in such a context and the lack of prior consent by the parents, relatives or teachers. In particular the ECtHR came to the conclusion that the domestic courts had only superficially balanced the question of the young girl’s right to private life (Article 8 ECHR) and the broadcaster’s right to freedom expression (Article 10 ECHR).}},
  articleno    = {{2022-4:1/19}},
  author       = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}},
  issn         = {{2078-6158}},
  keywords     = {{Freedom of expression,broadcast,interview with minors,prior consent,protection of privacy,television,protection of minors}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2022-4}},
  pages        = {{2}},
  series       = {{IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE)}},
  title        = {{European Court of Human Rights : I.V.Ț. v. Romania}},
  url          = {{https://merlin.obs.coe.int/article/9446}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}