Evaluation of humoral and cellular responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinated immunocompromised patients
- Author
- Matthijs Oyaert (UGent) , Marie-Angélique De Scheerder (UGent) , Sophie Van Herrewege, Guy Laureys (UGent) , Sofie Van Assche, Melissa Cambron, Leslie Naesens (UGent) , Levi Hoste (UGent) , Karlien Claes (UGent) , Filomeen Haerynck (UGent) , Tessa Kerre (UGent) , Steven Van Laecke (UGent) , Wim Van Biesen (UGent) , Peggy Jacques (UGent) , Bruno Verhasselt (UGent) and Elizaveta Padalko (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- BackgroundImmunocompromised patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and impaired vaccine response. In this observational prospective study, we evaluated immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in cohorts of primary or secondary immunocompromised patients. MethodsFive clinical groups of immunocompromised patients [primary immunodeficiency (PID) (n=57), people living with HIV (PLWH) (n=27), secondary immunocompromised patients with a broad variety of underlying rheumatologic (n=23) and homogeneous (multiple sclerosis) neurologic (n=53) conditions and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=39)] as well as a healthy control group (n=54) were included. Systemic humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated by determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibodies using a TrimericS IgG assay (Diasorin) and through quantification of interferon gamma release in response to SARS-CoV-2 antigen with QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (Qiagen), respectively. Responses were measured at pre-defined time-points after complete vaccination. ResultsAll healthy controls, PLWH and CKD-patients had detectable antibodies 10 to 14 days (T2) and 3 months (T3) after administration of the second vaccination. In contrast, only 94.5% of the PID, 50.0% of the rheumatologic and 48.0% of neurologic patients developed antibodies at T2 and only 89.1% of the PID, 52.4% of the rheumatologic and 50.0% of neurologic patients developed antibodies at T3. At T3 no significant differences in cellular response between the healthy control group and the PLWH and CKD groups were found, while proportions of reactive subjects were lower in PID and rheumatologic patients and higher in neurologic patients. Humoral and cellular immune responses significantly correlated in the healthy control, PID, PLWH groups for all 3 antigens. ConclusionPatients with acquired or inherited immune disorders may show variable immune responses to vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Whether humoral, cellular or both immune responses are delayed depends on the patient group, therapy and individual risk factors. These data may guide the counselling of patients with immune disorders regarding vaccination of SARS-CoV-2.
- Keywords
- Immunology, Immunology and Allergy, SARS-CoV-2, immunocompromised, antibodies, vaccination, humoral response
Downloads
-
fimmu-13-858399.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 4.45 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8748089
- MLA
- Oyaert, Matthijs, et al. “Evaluation of Humoral and Cellular Responses in SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccinated Immunocompromised Patients.” FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, vol. 13, 2022, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.858399.
- APA
- Oyaert, M., De Scheerder, M.-A., Van Herrewege, S., Laureys, G., Van Assche, S., Cambron, M., … Padalko, E. (2022). Evaluation of humoral and cellular responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinated immunocompromised patients. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.858399
- Chicago author-date
- Oyaert, Matthijs, Marie-Angélique De Scheerder, Sophie Van Herrewege, Guy Laureys, Sofie Van Assche, Melissa Cambron, Leslie Naesens, et al. 2022. “Evaluation of Humoral and Cellular Responses in SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccinated Immunocompromised Patients.” FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.858399.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Oyaert, Matthijs, Marie-Angélique De Scheerder, Sophie Van Herrewege, Guy Laureys, Sofie Van Assche, Melissa Cambron, Leslie Naesens, Levi Hoste, Karlien Claes, Filomeen Haerynck, Tessa Kerre, Steven Van Laecke, Wim Van Biesen, Peggy Jacques, Bruno Verhasselt, and Elizaveta Padalko. 2022. “Evaluation of Humoral and Cellular Responses in SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccinated Immunocompromised Patients.” FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY 13. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.858399.
- Vancouver
- 1.Oyaert M, De Scheerder M-A, Van Herrewege S, Laureys G, Van Assche S, Cambron M, et al. Evaluation of humoral and cellular responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinated immunocompromised patients. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY. 2022;13.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Oyaert et al., “Evaluation of humoral and cellular responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinated immunocompromised patients,” FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, vol. 13, 2022.
@article{8748089,
abstract = {{BackgroundImmunocompromised patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and impaired vaccine response. In this observational prospective study, we evaluated immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in cohorts of primary or secondary immunocompromised patients. MethodsFive clinical groups of immunocompromised patients [primary immunodeficiency (PID) (n=57), people living with HIV (PLWH) (n=27), secondary immunocompromised patients with a broad variety of underlying rheumatologic (n=23) and homogeneous (multiple sclerosis) neurologic (n=53) conditions and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=39)] as well as a healthy control group (n=54) were included. Systemic humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated by determination of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibodies using a TrimericS IgG assay (Diasorin) and through quantification of interferon gamma release in response to SARS-CoV-2 antigen with QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (Qiagen), respectively. Responses were measured at pre-defined time-points after complete vaccination. ResultsAll healthy controls, PLWH and CKD-patients had detectable antibodies 10 to 14 days (T2) and 3 months (T3) after administration of the second vaccination. In contrast, only 94.5% of the PID, 50.0% of the rheumatologic and 48.0% of neurologic patients developed antibodies at T2 and only 89.1% of the PID, 52.4% of the rheumatologic and 50.0% of neurologic patients developed antibodies at T3. At T3 no significant differences in cellular response between the healthy control group and the PLWH and CKD groups were found, while proportions of reactive subjects were lower in PID and rheumatologic patients and higher in neurologic patients. Humoral and cellular immune responses significantly correlated in the healthy control, PID, PLWH groups for all 3 antigens. ConclusionPatients with acquired or inherited immune disorders may show variable immune responses to vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Whether humoral, cellular or both immune responses are delayed depends on the patient group, therapy and individual risk factors. These data may guide the counselling of patients with immune disorders regarding vaccination of SARS-CoV-2.}},
articleno = {{858399}},
author = {{Oyaert, Matthijs and De Scheerder, Marie-Angélique and Van Herrewege, Sophie and Laureys, Guy and Van Assche, Sofie and Cambron, Melissa and Naesens, Leslie and Hoste, Levi and Claes, Karlien and Haerynck, Filomeen and Kerre, Tessa and Van Laecke, Steven and Van Biesen, Wim and Jacques, Peggy and Verhasselt, Bruno and Padalko, Elizaveta}},
issn = {{1664-3224}},
journal = {{FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY}},
keywords = {{Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,SARS-CoV-2,immunocompromised,antibodies,vaccination,humoral response}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{13}},
title = {{Evaluation of humoral and cellular responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinated immunocompromised patients}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.858399}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2022}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: