Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 233.30 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Balancing embryo donation and double ...

Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation

Guido Pennings (UGent)
(2022) HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 37(3). p.389-392
Author
Organization
Abstract
Huele and colleagues started a debate on the comparison between embryo donation and double donation. Although I largely agree with their final conclusion, I believe that the perspective of the recipients needs to be added to get a more complete picture. The present contribution focuses on that perspective and advances other arguments to balance the two methods. The main argument in favour of double donation is the difference in perceived meaning for the recipients compared to surplus embryos. The main arguments in favour of embryo donation are the fair distribution of scarce resources (i.e. donor gametes) and the principle of non-maleficence through the avoidance of unnecessary oocyte donation cycles. The balance would be to put both treatments on an equal footing.
Keywords
OUTCOMES, double donation, embryo bank, embryo donation, embryo disposition, ethics, gamete donation, justice, recipients

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 233.30 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Pennings, Guido. “Balancing Embryo Donation and Double Gamete Donation.” HUMAN REPRODUCTION, vol. 37, no. 3, 2022, pp. 389–92, doi:10.1093/humrep/deab273.
APA
Pennings, G. (2022). Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab273
Chicago author-date
Pennings, Guido. 2022. “Balancing Embryo Donation and Double Gamete Donation.” HUMAN REPRODUCTION. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab273.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Pennings, Guido. 2022. “Balancing Embryo Donation and Double Gamete Donation.” HUMAN REPRODUCTION. doi:10.1093/humrep/deab273.
Vancouver
1.
Pennings G. Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation. Vol. 37, HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 2022. p. 389–92.
IEEE
[1]
G. Pennings, “Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation,” HUMAN REPRODUCTION, vol. 37, no. 3. pp. 389–392, 2022.
@misc{8747309,
  abstract     = {{Huele and colleagues started a debate on the comparison between embryo donation and double donation. Although I largely agree with their final conclusion, I believe that the perspective of the recipients needs to be added to get a more complete picture. The present contribution focuses on that perspective and advances other arguments to balance the two methods. The main argument in favour of double donation is the difference in perceived meaning for the recipients compared to surplus embryos. The main arguments in favour of embryo donation are the fair distribution of scarce resources (i.e. donor gametes) and the principle of non-maleficence through the avoidance of unnecessary oocyte donation cycles. The balance would be to put both treatments on an equal footing.}},
  author       = {{Pennings, Guido}},
  issn         = {{0268-1161}},
  keywords     = {{OUTCOMES,double donation,embryo bank,embryo donation,embryo disposition,ethics,gamete donation,justice,recipients}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{389--392}},
  series       = {{HUMAN REPRODUCTION}},
  title        = {{Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab273}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: