Advanced search
1 file | 7.84 MB Add to list

Intestinal exposure to ceftiofur and cefquinome after intramuscular treatment and the impact of ceftiofur on the pig fecal microbiome and resistome

Sofie Rutjens (UGent) , Nick Vereecke (UGent) , Ward De Spiegelaere (UGent) , Siska Croubels (UGent) and Mathias Devreese (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Optimization of antimicrobial treatment during a bacterial infection in livestock requires in-depth knowledge of the impact of antimicrobial therapy on the pathogen and commensal microbiota. Once administered antimicrobials and/or their metabolites are excreted either by the kidneys through urine and/or by the intestinal tract through feces, causing antimicrobial pressure and possibly the emergence of resistance in the gastro-intestinal tract. So far, the excretion of ceftiofur and cefquinome in the intestinal tract of pigs has not been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the excretion of ceftiofur and cefquinome in the different segments of the gut and feces after intramuscular administration. Therefore, 16 pigs were treated either with ceftiofur (n = 8) or cefquinome (n = 8), and feces were collected during the entire treatment period. The presence of ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofuracetamide or cefquinome were quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. At the end of the treatment, pigs were euthanized, and samples from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and cecum were analyzed. In feces, no active antimicrobial residues could be measured, except for one ceftiofur-treated pig. In the gut segments, the concentration of both antimicrobials increased from duodenum toward the ileum, with a maximum in the ileum (187.8 +/- 101.7 ng center dot g(-1) ceftiofur-related residues, 57.8 +/- 37.5 ng center dot g(-1) cefquinome) and sharply decreased in the cecum (below the limit of quantification for ceftiofur-related residues, 6.4 +/- 4.2 ng center dot g(-1) cefquinome). Additionally, long-read Nanopore sequencing and targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were performed in an attempt to clarify the discrepancy in fecal excretion of ceftiofur-related residues between pigs. In general, there was an increase in Prevotella, Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium and a decrease in Escherichia and Clostridium after ceftiofur administration (q-value < 0.05). The sequencing and qPCR could not provide an explanation for the unexpected excretion of ceftiofur-related residues in one pig out of eight. Overall, this study provides valuable information on the gut excretion of parenteral administered ceftiofur and cefquinome.
Keywords
Pharmacology (medical), Infectious Diseases, Microbiology (medical), General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, Biochemistry, Microbiology, intramuscular administration, cephalosporins, UHPLC-MS, MS, gut and fecal excretion, swine, fecal microbiome, resistome, A BETA-LACTAMASE, ESCHERICHIA-COLI, ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL DIVERSITY, CFXA EXPRESSION, GUT MICROBIOTA, PHARMACOKINETICS, FECES, BACTEROIDES, FEED

Downloads

  • published.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 7.84 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Rutjens, Sofie, et al. “Intestinal Exposure to Ceftiofur and Cefquinome after Intramuscular Treatment and the Impact of Ceftiofur on the Pig Fecal Microbiome and Resistome.” ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, vol. 11, no. 3, 2022, doi:10.3390/antibiotics11030342.
APA
Rutjens, S., Vereecke, N., De Spiegelaere, W., Croubels, S., & Devreese, M. (2022). Intestinal exposure to ceftiofur and cefquinome after intramuscular treatment and the impact of ceftiofur on the pig fecal microbiome and resistome. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030342
Chicago author-date
Rutjens, Sofie, Nick Vereecke, Ward De Spiegelaere, Siska Croubels, and Mathias Devreese. 2022. “Intestinal Exposure to Ceftiofur and Cefquinome after Intramuscular Treatment and the Impact of Ceftiofur on the Pig Fecal Microbiome and Resistome.” ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030342.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Rutjens, Sofie, Nick Vereecke, Ward De Spiegelaere, Siska Croubels, and Mathias Devreese. 2022. “Intestinal Exposure to Ceftiofur and Cefquinome after Intramuscular Treatment and the Impact of Ceftiofur on the Pig Fecal Microbiome and Resistome.” ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL 11 (3). doi:10.3390/antibiotics11030342.
Vancouver
1.
Rutjens S, Vereecke N, De Spiegelaere W, Croubels S, Devreese M. Intestinal exposure to ceftiofur and cefquinome after intramuscular treatment and the impact of ceftiofur on the pig fecal microbiome and resistome. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL. 2022;11(3).
IEEE
[1]
S. Rutjens, N. Vereecke, W. De Spiegelaere, S. Croubels, and M. Devreese, “Intestinal exposure to ceftiofur and cefquinome after intramuscular treatment and the impact of ceftiofur on the pig fecal microbiome and resistome,” ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, vol. 11, no. 3, 2022.
@article{8744537,
  abstract     = {{Optimization of antimicrobial treatment during a bacterial infection in livestock requires in-depth knowledge of the impact of antimicrobial therapy on the pathogen and commensal microbiota. Once administered antimicrobials and/or their metabolites are excreted either by the kidneys through urine and/or by the intestinal tract through feces, causing antimicrobial pressure and possibly the emergence of resistance in the gastro-intestinal tract. So far, the excretion of ceftiofur and cefquinome in the intestinal tract of pigs has not been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the excretion of ceftiofur and cefquinome in the different segments of the gut and feces after intramuscular administration. Therefore, 16 pigs were treated either with ceftiofur (n = 8) or cefquinome (n = 8), and feces were collected during the entire treatment period. The presence of ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofuracetamide or cefquinome were quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. At the end of the treatment, pigs were euthanized, and samples from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and cecum were analyzed. In feces, no active antimicrobial residues could be measured, except for one ceftiofur-treated pig. In the gut segments, the concentration of both antimicrobials increased from duodenum toward the ileum, with a maximum in the ileum (187.8 +/- 101.7 ng center dot g(-1) ceftiofur-related residues, 57.8 +/- 37.5 ng center dot g(-1) cefquinome) and sharply decreased in the cecum (below the limit of quantification for ceftiofur-related residues, 6.4 +/- 4.2 ng center dot g(-1) cefquinome). Additionally, long-read Nanopore sequencing and targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were performed in an attempt to clarify the discrepancy in fecal excretion of ceftiofur-related residues between pigs. In general, there was an increase in Prevotella, Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium and a decrease in Escherichia and Clostridium after ceftiofur administration (q-value < 0.05). The sequencing and qPCR could not provide an explanation for the unexpected excretion of ceftiofur-related residues in one pig out of eight. Overall, this study provides valuable information on the gut excretion of parenteral administered ceftiofur and cefquinome.}},
  articleno    = {{342}},
  author       = {{Rutjens, Sofie and Vereecke, Nick and De Spiegelaere, Ward and Croubels, Siska and Devreese, Mathias}},
  issn         = {{2079-6382}},
  journal      = {{ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL}},
  keywords     = {{Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Pharmacology,Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,Biochemistry,Microbiology,intramuscular administration,cephalosporins,UHPLC-MS,MS,gut and fecal excretion,swine,fecal microbiome,resistome,A BETA-LACTAMASE,ESCHERICHIA-COLI,ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE,BACTERIAL DIVERSITY,CFXA EXPRESSION,GUT MICROBIOTA,PHARMACOKINETICS,FECES,BACTEROIDES,FEED}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{19}},
  title        = {{Intestinal exposure to ceftiofur and cefquinome after intramuscular treatment and the impact of ceftiofur on the pig fecal microbiome and resistome}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030342}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: