Advanced search
1 file | 918.93 KB Add to list

How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs

(2024) ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE. 13(1). p.34-52
Author
Organization
Abstract
Significance: Wounds of all types remain one of the most important, expensive, and common medical problems, for example, up to approximately two-thirds of the work time of community nurses is spent on wound management. Many wounds are treated by means of dressings. The materials used in a dressing, their microarchitecture, and how they are composed and constructed form the basis for the laboratory and clinical performances of any advanced dressing.Recent Advances: The established structure/function principle in material science is reviewed and analyzed in this article in the context of wound dressings. This principle states that the microstructure determines the physical, mechanical, and fluid transport and handling properties, all of which are critically important for, and relevant to the, adequate performances of wound dressings.Critical Issues: According to the above principle, once the clinical requirements for wound care and management are defined for a given wound type and etiology, it should be theoretically possible to translate clinically relevant characteristics of dressings into physical test designs resulting specific metrics of materials, mechanical, and fluid transport and handling properties, all of which should be determined to meet the clinical objectives and be measurable through standardized bench testing.Future Directions: This multidisciplinary review article, written by an International Wound Dressing Technology Expert Panel, discusses the translation of clinical wound care and management into effective, basic engineering standard testing requirements from wound dressings with respect to material types, microarchitecture, and properties, to achieve the desirable performance in supporting healing and improving the quality of life of patients.
Keywords
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, treatment, laboratory testing methods and standards, test fluid, fluid handling and retention, exudate management, POLYURETHANE FOAMS, PAIN INTENSITY, SKIN, PH, PERMEABILITY, REMOVAL, HISTORY

Downloads

  • published.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 918.93 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Gefen, Amit, et al. “How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs.” ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024, pp. 34–52, doi:10.1089/wound.2021.0173.
APA
Gefen, A., Alves, P., Beeckman, D., Cullen, B., Lazaro Martinez, J. L., Lev-Tov, H. A., … Woo, K. (2024). How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs. ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, 13(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0173
Chicago author-date
Gefen, Amit, Paulo Alves, Dimitri Beeckman, Breda Cullen, José Luis Lazaro Martinez, Hadar Avihai Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, et al. 2024. “How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs.” ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE 13 (1): 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0173.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Gefen, Amit, Paulo Alves, Dimitri Beeckman, Breda Cullen, José Luis Lazaro Martinez, Hadar Avihai Lev-Tov, Bijan Najafi, Nick Santamaria, Andrew Sharpe, Terry Swanson, and Kevin Woo. 2024. “How Should Clinical Wound Care and Management Translate to Effective Engineering Standard Testing Requirements from Foam Dressings? Mapping the Existing Gaps and Needs.” ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE 13 (1): 34–52. doi:10.1089/wound.2021.0173.
Vancouver
1.
Gefen A, Alves P, Beeckman D, Cullen B, Lazaro Martinez JL, Lev-Tov HA, et al. How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs. ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE. 2024;13(1):34–52.
IEEE
[1]
A. Gefen et al., “How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs,” ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 34–52, 2024.
@article{8743025,
  abstract     = {{Significance: Wounds of all types remain one of the most important, expensive, and common medical problems, for example, up to approximately two-thirds of the work time of community nurses is spent on wound management. Many wounds are treated by means of dressings. The materials used in a dressing, their microarchitecture, and how they are composed and constructed form the basis for the laboratory and clinical performances of any advanced dressing.Recent Advances: The established structure/function principle in material science is reviewed and analyzed in this article in the context of wound dressings. This principle states that the microstructure determines the physical, mechanical, and fluid transport and handling properties, all of which are critically important for, and relevant to the, adequate performances of wound dressings.Critical Issues: According to the above principle, once the clinical requirements for wound care and management are defined for a given wound type and etiology, it should be theoretically possible to translate clinically relevant characteristics of dressings into physical test designs resulting specific metrics of materials, mechanical, and fluid transport and handling properties, all of which should be determined to meet the clinical objectives and be measurable through standardized bench testing.Future Directions: This multidisciplinary review article, written by an International Wound Dressing Technology Expert Panel, discusses the translation of clinical wound care and management into effective, basic engineering standard testing requirements from wound dressings with respect to material types, microarchitecture, and properties, to achieve the desirable performance in supporting healing and improving the quality of life of patients.}},
  author       = {{Gefen, Amit and Alves, Paulo and Beeckman, Dimitri and Cullen, Breda and Lazaro Martinez, José Luis and Lev-Tov, Hadar Avihai and Najafi, Bijan and Santamaria, Nick and Sharpe, Andrew and Swanson, Terry and Woo, Kevin}},
  issn         = {{2162-1918}},
  journal      = {{ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE}},
  keywords     = {{Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine,treatment,laboratory testing methods and standards,test fluid,fluid handling and retention,exudate management,POLYURETHANE FOAMS,PAIN INTENSITY,SKIN,PH,PERMEABILITY,REMOVAL,HISTORY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{34--52}},
  title        = {{How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0173}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: