Embodying stressful events : no difference in subjective arousal and neural correlates related to immersion, interoception, and embodied mentalization
- Author
- Sarah De Coninck, Lambertus Aben, Eva Van den Bussche, Peter Mariën and Frank Van Overwalle
- Organization
- Abstract
- Repetitive thought about oneself, including one's emotions, can lead to both adaptive and maladaptive effects. Construal level of repetitive self-referential thought might moderate this. During interoception, which engages areas such as the insula, the anterior and/or posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the somatosensory cortex, concrete low level construal self-referential thought is applied, which has been shown to lead to more positive emotions after upsetting events. Contrarily, during immersion, related to neural activity in the default mode network (DMN), abstract high level construal self-referential thought is applied, which is linked to depression. The current study investigated whether the integration of concrete and abstract self-referential thought by means of embodied mentalization leads to less subjective arousal, decreased DMN activity and increased somatosensory activity as compared to immersion, and to more DMN activity as compared to interoception. In the fMRI scanner, participants imagined stressful events while adopting immersion, interoception or embodied mentalization. After each imagined stressful event, participants rated their subjective arousal and how difficult it was to apply the mode of self-referential thought. Results showed that participants felt that immersion was easier to apply than embodied mentalization. However, no differences in subjective arousal or neural activity were found between immersion, interoception and embodied mentalization. Possible reasons for this lack of significant differences are discussed.
- Keywords
- Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, embodiment, interoception, mentalization, immersion, self-referential repetitive thought, SELF-FOCUSED ATTENTION, MINDFUL ATTENTION, PREFRONTAL CORTEX, DEFAULT-MODE, RUMINATION, BRAIN, METAANALYSIS, MEDITATION, EMOTION, ACCEPTANCE
Downloads
-
fnbeh-15-640482.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 1.10 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8739868
- MLA
- De Coninck, Sarah, et al. “Embodying Stressful Events : No Difference in Subjective Arousal and Neural Correlates Related to Immersion, Interoception, and Embodied Mentalization.” FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 15, 2021, doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640482.
- APA
- De Coninck, S., Aben, L., Van den Bussche, E., Mariën, P., & Van Overwalle, F. (2021). Embodying stressful events : no difference in subjective arousal and neural correlates related to immersion, interoception, and embodied mentalization. FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640482
- Chicago author-date
- De Coninck, Sarah, Lambertus Aben, Eva Van den Bussche, Peter Mariën, and Frank Van Overwalle. 2021. “Embodying Stressful Events : No Difference in Subjective Arousal and Neural Correlates Related to Immersion, Interoception, and Embodied Mentalization.” FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640482.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Coninck, Sarah, Lambertus Aben, Eva Van den Bussche, Peter Mariën, and Frank Van Overwalle. 2021. “Embodying Stressful Events : No Difference in Subjective Arousal and Neural Correlates Related to Immersion, Interoception, and Embodied Mentalization.” FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 15. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640482.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Coninck S, Aben L, Van den Bussche E, Mariën P, Van Overwalle F. Embodying stressful events : no difference in subjective arousal and neural correlates related to immersion, interoception, and embodied mentalization. FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE. 2021;15.
- IEEE
- [1]S. De Coninck, L. Aben, E. Van den Bussche, P. Mariën, and F. Van Overwalle, “Embodying stressful events : no difference in subjective arousal and neural correlates related to immersion, interoception, and embodied mentalization,” FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 15, 2021.
@article{8739868,
abstract = {{Repetitive thought about oneself, including one's emotions, can lead to both adaptive and maladaptive effects. Construal level of repetitive self-referential thought might moderate this. During interoception, which engages areas such as the insula, the anterior and/or posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the somatosensory cortex, concrete low level construal self-referential thought is applied, which has been shown to lead to more positive emotions after upsetting events. Contrarily, during immersion, related to neural activity in the default mode network (DMN), abstract high level construal self-referential thought is applied, which is linked to depression. The current study investigated whether the integration of concrete and abstract self-referential thought by means of embodied mentalization leads to less subjective arousal, decreased DMN activity and increased somatosensory activity as compared to immersion, and to more DMN activity as compared to interoception. In the fMRI scanner, participants imagined stressful events while adopting immersion, interoception or embodied mentalization. After each imagined stressful event, participants rated their subjective arousal and how difficult it was to apply the mode of self-referential thought. Results showed that participants felt that immersion was easier to apply than embodied mentalization. However, no differences in subjective arousal or neural activity were found between immersion, interoception and embodied mentalization. Possible reasons for this lack of significant differences are discussed.}},
articleno = {{640482}},
author = {{De Coninck, Sarah and Aben, Lambertus and Van den Bussche, Eva and Mariën, Peter and Van Overwalle, Frank}},
issn = {{1662-5153}},
journal = {{FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE}},
keywords = {{Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,embodiment,interoception,mentalization,immersion,self-referential repetitive thought,SELF-FOCUSED ATTENTION,MINDFUL ATTENTION,PREFRONTAL CORTEX,DEFAULT-MODE,RUMINATION,BRAIN,METAANALYSIS,MEDITATION,EMOTION,ACCEPTANCE}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{10}},
title = {{Embodying stressful events : no difference in subjective arousal and neural correlates related to immersion, interoception, and embodied mentalization}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640482}},
volume = {{15}},
year = {{2021}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: