Advanced search
1 file | 1.06 MB Add to list

Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint : current Status, gaps and recommendations

(2021) FOODS. 10(12).
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Cultured meat has been presented as an environmentally friendlier option to conventional meat, but due to the limited data, the studies related to its performance are scarce and based on hypothetical production processes. This work provides a short literature review of the published environmental assessments of cultured meat. The main findings of this critical analysis showed that the lack of real data related to cultured meat decreased the level of accuracy of each study. The missing environmental profile of the process itself, including the proliferation and differentiation phases in bioreactors, along with key ingredients such as growth factors and other recombinant proteins, increase the difficulty of achieving reliable conclusions. In order to bridge the highlighted gaps, a complete production system is modelled and analysed from an engineering and life-cycle perspective. Furthermore, an overview of the supply chains of different products used in the process is provided, together with recommendations on how they should be considered in future life-cycle assessments. In essence, this work provides a structured pathway for upcoming consistent environmental assessments in this field, with the objective of setting the basis to understand the potential of cultured meat.
Keywords
Life cycle assessment, Environmental sustainability assessment, Prospective life cycle assessment, environmental impact, sustainability, cultured meat, conventional meat, LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT, REGULATORY CHALLENGES, LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION, ANIMAL-WELFARE, FOOD-PRODUCTS, STEM-CELLS, SUSTAINABILITY, ALTERNATIVES, QUALITY, BEEF

Downloads

  • Rodriguez et al. 2022. Analysis.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.06 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Rodríguez Escobar, María Ignacia, et al. “Analysis of the Cultured Meat Production System in Function of Its Environmental Footprint : Current Status, Gaps and Recommendations.” FOODS, vol. 10, no. 12, 2021, doi:10.3390/foods10122941.
APA
Rodríguez Escobar, M. I., Cadena Martinez, E., Nhu, T. T., Cooreman-Algoed, M., De Smet, S., & Dewulf, J. (2021). Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint : current Status, gaps and recommendations. FOODS, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122941
Chicago author-date
Rodríguez Escobar, María Ignacia, Erasmo Cadena Martinez, Thuy Trang Nhu, Margot Cooreman-Algoed, Stefaan De Smet, and Jo Dewulf. 2021. “Analysis of the Cultured Meat Production System in Function of Its Environmental Footprint : Current Status, Gaps and Recommendations.” FOODS 10 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10122941.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Rodríguez Escobar, María Ignacia, Erasmo Cadena Martinez, Thuy Trang Nhu, Margot Cooreman-Algoed, Stefaan De Smet, and Jo Dewulf. 2021. “Analysis of the Cultured Meat Production System in Function of Its Environmental Footprint : Current Status, Gaps and Recommendations.” FOODS 10 (12). doi:10.3390/foods10122941.
Vancouver
1.
Rodríguez Escobar MI, Cadena Martinez E, Nhu TT, Cooreman-Algoed M, De Smet S, Dewulf J. Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint : current Status, gaps and recommendations. FOODS. 2021;10(12).
IEEE
[1]
M. I. Rodríguez Escobar, E. Cadena Martinez, T. T. Nhu, M. Cooreman-Algoed, S. De Smet, and J. Dewulf, “Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint : current Status, gaps and recommendations,” FOODS, vol. 10, no. 12, 2021.
@article{8738414,
  abstract     = {{Cultured meat has been presented as an environmentally friendlier option to conventional meat, but due to the limited data, the studies related to its performance are scarce and based on hypothetical production processes. This work provides a short literature review of the published environmental assessments of cultured meat. The main findings of this critical analysis showed that the lack of real data related to cultured meat decreased the level of accuracy of each study. The missing environmental profile of the process itself, including the proliferation and differentiation phases in bioreactors, along with key ingredients such as growth factors and other recombinant proteins, increase the difficulty of achieving reliable conclusions. In order to bridge the highlighted gaps, a complete production system is modelled and analysed from an engineering and life-cycle perspective. Furthermore, an overview of the supply chains of different products used in the process is provided, together with recommendations on how they should be considered in future life-cycle assessments. In essence, this work provides a structured pathway for upcoming consistent environmental assessments in this field, with the objective of setting the basis to understand the potential of cultured meat.}},
  articleno    = {{2941}},
  author       = {{Rodríguez Escobar, María Ignacia and Cadena Martinez, Erasmo and Nhu, Thuy Trang and Cooreman-Algoed, Margot and De Smet, Stefaan and Dewulf, Jo}},
  issn         = {{2304-8158}},
  journal      = {{FOODS}},
  keywords     = {{Life cycle assessment,Environmental sustainability assessment,Prospective life cycle assessment,environmental impact,sustainability,cultured meat,conventional meat,LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT,REGULATORY CHALLENGES,LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION,ANIMAL-WELFARE,FOOD-PRODUCTS,STEM-CELLS,SUSTAINABILITY,ALTERNATIVES,QUALITY,BEEF}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{26}},
  title        = {{Analysis of the cultured meat production system in function of its environmental footprint : current Status, gaps and recommendations}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10122941}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: