The IDEFICS primary prevention as a good practice example
- Author
- Iris Pigeot, Stefaan De Henauw (UGent) and Wolfgang Ahrens
- Organization
- Abstract
- Worldwide the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is strikingly high. Prevention programs are therefore of high priority at a national and international level. In the framework of the IDEFICS study a primary prevention program was developed, implemented and evaluated. This paper investigates to what degree the IDEFICS intervention may serve as good practice example. For this purpose, the single modules are described and the achieved effects are discussed. In eight European countries 16,228 children aged 2 to 9.9 years were recruited from kindergartens and schools. About half of them participated in a primary prevention program. In each country the intervention region was matched to a control region with a similar socio-demographic profile. All children participated in an extensive examination program at baseline, which was repeated two years later to assess the development of the children and the intervention effects. In addition, a further follow-up examination took place five years after the intervention in the framework of the I.Family study. After two years the IDEFICS intervention showed only minor effects on an individual level, but sustainable effects on the community and the setting level. After five years a beneficial change in the consumption of sugar and water could be observed in the intervention families and children who were overweight and obese at baseline showed favorable weight trajectories. The reasons for the weak intervention effects may be, among others, due to the limited penetration of intervention messages, an insufficient intensity of local intervention activities and our limited ability to induce structural changes of the obesogenic environment.
- Keywords
- COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION, MEASURED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, CHILDHOOD, OBESITY, SEDENTARY TIME, FOCUS GROUPS, CHILDREN, PROGRAM, DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, OVERWEIGHT
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 1.23 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8731217
- MLA
- Pigeot, Iris, et al. “The IDEFICS Primary Prevention as a Good Practice Example.” BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, vol. 59, no. 11, 2016, pp. 1385–93, doi:10.1007/s00103-016-2445-1.
- APA
- Pigeot, I., De Henauw, S., & Ahrens, W. (2016). The IDEFICS primary prevention as a good practice example. BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 59(11), 1385–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-016-2445-1
- Chicago author-date
- Pigeot, Iris, Stefaan De Henauw, and Wolfgang Ahrens. 2016. “The IDEFICS Primary Prevention as a Good Practice Example.” BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ 59 (11): 1385–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-016-2445-1.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Pigeot, Iris, Stefaan De Henauw, and Wolfgang Ahrens. 2016. “The IDEFICS Primary Prevention as a Good Practice Example.” BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ 59 (11): 1385–1393. doi:10.1007/s00103-016-2445-1.
- Vancouver
- 1.Pigeot I, De Henauw S, Ahrens W. The IDEFICS primary prevention as a good practice example. BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ. 2016;59(11):1385–93.
- IEEE
- [1]I. Pigeot, S. De Henauw, and W. Ahrens, “The IDEFICS primary prevention as a good practice example,” BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1385–1393, 2016.
@article{8731217,
abstract = {{Worldwide the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is strikingly high. Prevention programs are therefore of high priority at a national and international level. In the framework of the IDEFICS study a primary prevention program was developed, implemented and evaluated. This paper investigates to what degree the IDEFICS intervention may serve as good practice example. For this purpose, the single modules are described and the achieved effects are discussed. In eight European countries 16,228 children aged 2 to 9.9 years were recruited from kindergartens and schools. About half of them participated in a primary prevention program. In each country the intervention region was matched to a control region with a similar socio-demographic profile. All children participated in an extensive examination program at baseline, which was repeated two years later to assess the development of the children and the intervention effects. In addition, a further follow-up examination took place five years after the intervention in the framework of the I.Family study. After two years the IDEFICS intervention showed only minor effects on an individual level, but sustainable effects on the community and the setting level. After five years a beneficial change in the consumption of sugar and water could be observed in the intervention families and children who were overweight and obese at baseline showed favorable weight trajectories. The reasons for the weak intervention effects may be, among others, due to the limited penetration of intervention messages, an insufficient intensity of local intervention activities and our limited ability to induce structural changes of the obesogenic environment.}},
author = {{Pigeot, Iris and De Henauw, Stefaan and Ahrens, Wolfgang}},
issn = {{1436-9990}},
journal = {{BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ}},
keywords = {{COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION,MEASURED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY,CHILDHOOD,OBESITY,SEDENTARY TIME,FOCUS GROUPS,CHILDREN,PROGRAM,DESIGN,IMPLEMENTATION,OVERWEIGHT}},
language = {{ger}},
number = {{11}},
pages = {{1385--1393}},
title = {{The IDEFICS primary prevention as a good practice example}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-016-2445-1}},
volume = {{59}},
year = {{2016}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: