Advanced search
1 file | 2.41 MB Add to list

Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process

Author
Organization
Abstract
Objective Physical function is one of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core outcome domains for hand osteoarthritis studies. Our aim was to select appropriate instrument(s) to measure this domain, as part of the development of a core outcome measurement set. Methods Following the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection process, the (function subscale of) the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were assessed for domain match, feasibility, truth and discrimination. Data gathered from available literature, working group and patient surveys, and additional analyses in two hand osteoarthritis cohorts were used to inform a consensus process. Results were summarized in Summary of Measurements Properties tables and reviewed by the OMERACT technical advisory group. Results MHQ passed the assessment of domain match and feasibility by the working group and patient research partners. For AUSCAN important limitations in feasibility were noted, but domain match was good. FIHOA did not pass the assessment and was not taken through the follow-up assessment. Based on published literature, reliability and construct/longitudinal validity of both MHQ and AUSCAN fulfilled OMERACT standards. While clinical trial discrimination and thresholds of meaning were good for AUSCAN, results for MHQ were ambiguous. Conclusion MHQ was provisionally endorsed as OMERACT core outcome measure for the core domain physical function. While AUSCAN may have better metric properties than MHQ, it received provisional endorsement as a second measure of function due to important feasibility issues. A research agenda to merit full endorsement was set.
Keywords
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rheumatology, OMERACT, Hand osteoarthritis, Outcome measurement, Function, Clinical trials, AUSTRALIAN/CANADIAN OSTEOARTHRITIS, CARPOMETACARPAL JOINT, OLDER-ADULTS, VALIDITY, INDEX, RELIABILITY, PAIN, EFFICACY, RESPONSIVENESS, PERFORMANCE

Downloads

  • 1-s2.0-S0049017221001682-main.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.41 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Kroon, Féline P. B., et al. “Core Outcome Measurement Instrument Selection for Physical Function in Hand Osteoarthritis Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 Process.” SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, vol. 51, no. 6, 2021, pp. 1311–19, doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014.
APA
Kroon, F. P. B., van der Heijde, D., Maxwell, L. J., Beaton, D. E., Abishek, A., Berenbaum, F., … Kloppenburg, M. (2021). Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 51(6), 1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014
Chicago author-date
Kroon, Féline P.B., Désirée van der Heijde, Lara J. Maxwell, Dorcas E. Beaton, Abishek Abishek, Francis Berenbaum, Francisco J. Blanco, et al. 2021. “Core Outcome Measurement Instrument Selection for Physical Function in Hand Osteoarthritis Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 Process.” SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM 51 (6): 1311–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Kroon, Féline P.B., Désirée van der Heijde, Lara J. Maxwell, Dorcas E. Beaton, Abishek Abishek, Francis Berenbaum, Francisco J. Blanco, Philip G. Conaghan, Krysia Dziedzic, Catherine L. Hill, Ida K. Haugen, Mariko Ishimori, Valentin Ritschl, Tanja A. Stamm, Ruth Wittoek, and Margreet Kloppenburg. 2021. “Core Outcome Measurement Instrument Selection for Physical Function in Hand Osteoarthritis Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 Process.” SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM 51 (6): 1311–1319. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014.
Vancouver
1.
Kroon FPB, van der Heijde D, Maxwell LJ, Beaton DE, Abishek A, Berenbaum F, et al. Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM. 2021;51(6):1311–9.
IEEE
[1]
F. P. B. Kroon et al., “Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process,” SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1311–1319, 2021.
@article{8725164,
  abstract     = {{Objective
Physical function is one of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core outcome domains for hand osteoarthritis studies. Our aim was to select appropriate instrument(s) to measure this domain, as part of the development of a core outcome measurement set.

Methods
Following the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection process, the (function subscale of) the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) were assessed for domain match, feasibility, truth and discrimination. Data gathered from available literature, working group and patient surveys, and additional analyses in two hand osteoarthritis cohorts were used to inform a consensus process. Results were summarized in Summary of Measurements Properties tables and reviewed by the OMERACT technical advisory group.

Results
MHQ passed the assessment of domain match and feasibility by the working group and patient research partners. For AUSCAN important limitations in feasibility were noted, but domain match was good. FIHOA did not pass the assessment and was not taken through the follow-up assessment. Based on published literature, reliability and construct/longitudinal validity of both MHQ and AUSCAN fulfilled OMERACT standards. While clinical trial discrimination and thresholds of meaning were good for AUSCAN, results for MHQ were ambiguous.

Conclusion
MHQ was provisionally endorsed as OMERACT core outcome measure for the core domain physical function. While AUSCAN may have better metric properties than MHQ, it received provisional endorsement as a second measure of function due to important feasibility issues. A research agenda to merit full endorsement was set.}},
  author       = {{Kroon, Féline P.B. and van der Heijde, Désirée and Maxwell, Lara J. and Beaton, Dorcas E. and Abishek, Abishek and Berenbaum, Francis and Blanco, Francisco J. and Conaghan, Philip G. and Dziedzic, Krysia and Hill, Catherine L. and Haugen, Ida K. and Ishimori, Mariko and Ritschl, Valentin and Stamm, Tanja A. and Wittoek, Ruth and Kloppenburg, Margreet}},
  issn         = {{0049-0172}},
  journal      = {{SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM}},
  keywords     = {{Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Rheumatology,OMERACT,Hand osteoarthritis,Outcome measurement,Function,Clinical trials,AUSTRALIAN/CANADIAN OSTEOARTHRITIS,CARPOMETACARPAL JOINT,OLDER-ADULTS,VALIDITY,INDEX,RELIABILITY,PAIN,EFFICACY,RESPONSIVENESS,PERFORMANCE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1311--1319}},
  title        = {{Core outcome measurement instrument selection for physical function in hand osteoarthritis using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.014}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: