@article{8721520,
  abstract     = {{Research among bilinguals suggests a foreign language effect for various tasks requiring a more systematic processing style. For instance, bilinguals seem less prone to heuristic reasoning when solving problem statements in their foreign (FL) as opposed to their native (NL) language. The present study aimed to determine whether such an effect might also be observed in the detection of semantic anomalies. Participants were presented NL and FL questions with and without anomalies while their eye movements were recorded. Overall, they failed to detect the anomaly in more than half of the trials. Furthermore, more illusions occurred for questions presented in the FL, indicating an FL disadvantage. Additionally, eye movement analyses suggested that reading patterns for anomalies are predominantly similar across languages. Our results therefore substantiate theories suggesting that FL use induces cognitive load, causing increased susceptibility to illusions due to partial semantic processing.}},
  author       = {{Dhaene, Sara and Dirix, Nicolas and Van Marcke, Hélène and Woumans, Evy}},
  issn         = {{1366-7289}},
  journal      = {{BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION}},
  keywords     = {{semantic illusions,anomaly detection,language processing,bilingualism,eye tracking,EYE-MOVEMENTS,ILLUSION,QUESTIONS,CONTRADICTIONS,COMPREHENSION,RETRIEVAL,ANOMALIES,CHILDREN,THINKING,TEXT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{444--458}},
  title        = {{Moses or Noah? A case of ‘potato-potahto’ when using a foreign language}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000882}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: