Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 4.64 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Catch-22 in the law of responsibility...

Catch-22 in the law of responsibility of international organizations : systemic deficiencies in the EU responsibility paradigm for unlawful human rights conduct in integrated border management

Joyce De Coninck (UGent)
(2021)
Author
Promoter
(UGent) and (UGent)
Organization
Abstract
EU policy in borders, asylum and migration shifted incrementally from a predominantly humanitarian-centric policy to an increasingly security-centric policy. This shift is evidenced by the EU’s Integrated Border Management (IBM), which has sparked widespread consternation on account of purported complicity by the EU in unlawful human rights conduct pursuant to its implementation. Yet, no legal responsibility has been established vis-à-vis the EU for such purported complicity. Mindful thereof, the doctoral dissertation addresses whether the EU as a subject of international law can – both in law and in practice - be held internationally responsible for human rights violations it has supposedly contributed to in the implementation of its IBM, or alternatively, whether systemic flaws in the international (human rights) responsibility paradigm allow the EU to sidestep such legal responsibility.
Keywords
EU Human Rights Law, Public International Law, Law of Responsibility, International Organizations, Asylum and Migration

Downloads

  • Download
    Doctoral Dissertation Joyce De Coninck.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.64 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Coninck, Joyce. Catch-22 in the Law of Responsibility of International Organizations : Systemic Deficiencies in the EU Responsibility Paradigm for Unlawful Human Rights Conduct in Integrated Border Management. Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology, 2021.
APA
De Coninck, J. (2021). Catch-22 in the law of responsibility of international organizations : systemic deficiencies in the EU responsibility paradigm for unlawful human rights conduct in integrated border management. Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent, Belgium.
Chicago author-date
De Coninck, Joyce. 2021. “Catch-22 in the Law of Responsibility of International Organizations : Systemic Deficiencies in the EU Responsibility Paradigm for Unlawful Human Rights Conduct in Integrated Border Management.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Coninck, Joyce. 2021. “Catch-22 in the Law of Responsibility of International Organizations : Systemic Deficiencies in the EU Responsibility Paradigm for Unlawful Human Rights Conduct in Integrated Border Management.” Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology.
Vancouver
1.
De Coninck J. Catch-22 in the law of responsibility of international organizations : systemic deficiencies in the EU responsibility paradigm for unlawful human rights conduct in integrated border management. [Ghent, Belgium]: Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology; 2021.
IEEE
[1]
J. De Coninck, “Catch-22 in the law of responsibility of international organizations : systemic deficiencies in the EU responsibility paradigm for unlawful human rights conduct in integrated border management,” Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent, Belgium, 2021.
@phdthesis{8721431,
  abstract     = {{EU policy in borders, asylum and migration shifted incrementally from a predominantly humanitarian-centric policy to an increasingly security-centric policy. This shift is evidenced by the EU’s Integrated Border Management (IBM), which has sparked widespread consternation on account of purported complicity by the EU in unlawful human rights conduct pursuant to its implementation. Yet, no legal responsibility has been established vis-à-vis the EU for such purported complicity. Mindful thereof, the doctoral dissertation addresses whether the EU as a subject of international law can – both in law and in practice - be held internationally responsible for human rights violations it has supposedly contributed to in the implementation of its IBM, or alternatively, whether systemic flaws in the international (human rights) responsibility paradigm allow the EU to sidestep such legal responsibility.}},
  author       = {{De Coninck, Joyce}},
  keywords     = {{EU Human Rights Law,Public International Law,Law of Responsibility,International Organizations,Asylum and Migration}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{XXII, 418}},
  publisher    = {{Ghent University. Faculty of Law and Criminology}},
  school       = {{Ghent University}},
  title        = {{Catch-22 in the law of responsibility of international organizations : systemic deficiencies in the EU responsibility paradigm for unlawful human rights conduct in integrated border management}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}