Advanced search
2 files | 2.12 MB Add to list

Incidental lexical mining in task repetition : the role of input, input repetition and individual differences

(2021) SYSTEM. 103.
Author
Organization
Abstract
The present study examined the effects of input, input repetition and individual differences (i.e., prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory) on L2 learners' incidental lexical mining in an immediate and a repeat oral task. Ninety participants were allocated to three groups: input (n = 32), input repetition (n = 29), and no input (n = 29). The input group was exposed to input before performing an immediate oral task, whereas the input repetition group was exposed to input before and after performing the immediate oral task. The no input group only performed the oral task without input exposure. Three groups repeated the same oral task after two days. Lexical mining was measured as the number of words and formulaic sequences shared between the oral tasks and the input text. The findings showed that the participants could mine both single words and formulaic sequences in the immediate and the repeat oral task. Yet, while the number of shared words in the repeat oral task was the same as in the immediate oral task, the number of shared formulaic sequences was lower. There was no effect of input repetition on lexical mining in the repeat oral task. Finally, only prior vocabulary knowledge was positively correlated to lexical mining.
Keywords
Lexical mining, Incidental vocabulary learning, Input repetition, Working memory, Prior vocabulary knowledge, WORKING-MEMORY, VOCABULARY ACQUISITION, PHONOLOGICAL MEMORY, 2ND-LANGUAGE, LANGUAGE, TEXT

Downloads

  • Duongetal System.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.48 MB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 643.34 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Duong, Phuong Thao, et al. “Incidental Lexical Mining in Task Repetition : The Role of Input, Input Repetition and Individual Differences.” SYSTEM, vol. 103, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102650.
APA
Duong, P. T., Montero Perez, M., Nguyen, L. Q., Desmet, P., & Peters, E. (2021). Incidental lexical mining in task repetition : the role of input, input repetition and individual differences. SYSTEM, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102650
Chicago author-date
Duong, Phuong Thao, Maribel Montero Perez, L. Q. Nguyen, Piet Desmet, and Elke Peters. 2021. “Incidental Lexical Mining in Task Repetition : The Role of Input, Input Repetition and Individual Differences.” SYSTEM 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102650.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Duong, Phuong Thao, Maribel Montero Perez, L. Q. Nguyen, Piet Desmet, and Elke Peters. 2021. “Incidental Lexical Mining in Task Repetition : The Role of Input, Input Repetition and Individual Differences.” SYSTEM 103. doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102650.
Vancouver
1.
Duong PT, Montero Perez M, Nguyen LQ, Desmet P, Peters E. Incidental lexical mining in task repetition : the role of input, input repetition and individual differences. SYSTEM. 2021;103.
IEEE
[1]
P. T. Duong, M. Montero Perez, L. Q. Nguyen, P. Desmet, and E. Peters, “Incidental lexical mining in task repetition : the role of input, input repetition and individual differences,” SYSTEM, vol. 103, 2021.
@article{8720893,
  abstract     = {{The present study examined the effects of input, input repetition and individual differences (i.e., prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory) on L2 learners' incidental lexical mining in an immediate and a repeat oral task. Ninety participants were allocated to three groups: input (n = 32), input repetition (n = 29), and no input (n = 29). The input group was exposed to input before performing an immediate oral task, whereas the input repetition group was exposed to input before and after performing the immediate oral task. The no input group only performed the oral task without input exposure. Three groups repeated the same oral task after two days. Lexical mining was measured as the number of words and formulaic sequences shared between the oral tasks and the input text. The findings showed that the participants could mine both single words and formulaic sequences in the immediate and the repeat oral task. Yet, while the number of shared words in the repeat oral task was the same as in the immediate oral task, the number of shared formulaic sequences was lower. There was no effect of input repetition on lexical mining in the repeat oral task. Finally, only prior vocabulary knowledge was positively correlated to lexical mining.}},
  articleno    = {{102650}},
  author       = {{Duong, Phuong Thao and Montero Perez, Maribel and Nguyen, L. Q. and Desmet, Piet and Peters, Elke}},
  issn         = {{0346-251X}},
  journal      = {{SYSTEM}},
  keywords     = {{Lexical mining,Incidental vocabulary learning,Input repetition,Working memory,Prior vocabulary knowledge,WORKING-MEMORY,VOCABULARY ACQUISITION,PHONOLOGICAL MEMORY,2ND-LANGUAGE,LANGUAGE,TEXT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{12}},
  title        = {{Incidental lexical mining in task repetition : the role of input, input repetition and individual differences}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102650}},
  volume       = {{103}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: