Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 437.92 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Third party intervention in the case ...

Third party intervention in the case Mikyas and others v. Belgium

Cathérine Van de Graaf (UGent) , Eva Brems (UGent) , Saïla Ouald Chaib (UGent) , Sarah Schoentjes (UGent) , Aurélie Van Baelen (UGent) , Emmanuelle Bribosia, Robin Médard Inghilterra, Hania Ouhnaoui, Isabelle Rorive, [Missing] Human Rights Centre, et al.
(2021)
Author
Organization
Abstract
This intervention summarizes some of the findings and insights that result from many years of research at both ULB and Ghent University on the topics raised in the Mikyas case. We are presenting it in a format that we hope will be useful to the lawyers and Judges who will be working on this case. In a first part, we present several highly relevant elements of the legal and societal context of the case: the situation regarding bans on religious signs/dress worn by pupils in Belgian schools and their impact (1.1.), the broader context of bans on religious signs/dress in Belgium (1.2.), the broader context of hostility against Muslims in Belgian society (1.3.), church/state relations in Belgium (1.4.), the treatment of bans on religious signs/dress in international human rights law (1.5.), and the relevance of intersectionality (1.6.). This will be followed by a second part, suggesting pathways of legal reasoning under the Convention in this type of cases.

Downloads

  • Download
    TPI-Mikyas 4 .pdf
    • full text (Author's original)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 437.92 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van de Graaf, Cathérine, et al. Third Party Intervention in the Case Mikyas and Others v. Belgium. Human Rights Centre, 2021.
APA
Van de Graaf, C., Brems, E., Ouald Chaib, S., Schoentjes, S., Van Baelen, A., Bribosia, E., … Equality Law Clinic, [Missing]. (2021). Third party intervention in the case Mikyas and others v. Belgium. Human Rights Centre.
Chicago author-date
Van de Graaf, Cathérine, Eva Brems, Saïla Ouald Chaib, Sarah Schoentjes, Aurélie Van Baelen, Emmanuelle Bribosia, Robin Médard Inghilterra, et al. 2021. “Third Party Intervention in the Case Mikyas and Others v. Belgium.” Human Rights Centre.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van de Graaf, Cathérine, Eva Brems, Saïla Ouald Chaib, Sarah Schoentjes, Aurélie Van Baelen, Emmanuelle Bribosia, Robin Médard Inghilterra, Hania Ouhnaoui, Isabelle Rorive, [Missing] Human Rights Centre, and [Missing] Equality Law Clinic. 2021. “Third Party Intervention in the Case Mikyas and Others v. Belgium.” Human Rights Centre.
Vancouver
1.
Van de Graaf C, Brems E, Ouald Chaib S, Schoentjes S, Van Baelen A, Bribosia E, et al. Third party intervention in the case Mikyas and others v. Belgium. Human Rights Centre; 2021.
IEEE
[1]
C. Van de Graaf et al., “Third party intervention in the case Mikyas and others v. Belgium.” Human Rights Centre, 2021.
@misc{8716420,
  abstract     = {{This intervention summarizes some of the findings and insights that result from many years of research at both ULB and Ghent University on the topics raised in the Mikyas case. We are presenting it in a format that we hope will be useful to the lawyers and Judges who will be working on this case. In a first part, we present several highly relevant elements of the legal and societal context of the case: the situation regarding bans on religious signs/dress worn by pupils in Belgian schools and their impact (1.1.), the broader context of bans on religious signs/dress in Belgium (1.2.), the broader context of hostility against Muslims in Belgian society (1.3.), church/state relations in Belgium (1.4.), the treatment of bans on religious signs/dress in international human rights law (1.5.), and the relevance of intersectionality (1.6.). This will be followed by a second part, suggesting pathways of legal reasoning under the Convention in this type of cases.}},
  author       = {{Van de Graaf, Cathérine and Brems, Eva and Ouald Chaib, Saïla and Schoentjes, Sarah and Van Baelen, Aurélie and Bribosia, Emmanuelle and Médard Inghilterra, Robin and Ouhnaoui, Hania and Rorive, Isabelle and Human Rights Centre, [Missing] and Equality Law Clinic, [Missing]}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{11}},
  publisher    = {{Human Rights Centre}},
  title        = {{Third party intervention in the case Mikyas and others v. Belgium}},
  url          = {{https://hrc.ugent.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/TPI-Mikyas.pdf}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}