Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
- Louise Puttevils, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt (UGent) , Paula Horczak (UGent) and Myriam Vervaet (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objective: Research has identified abnormal emotion regulation (ER) as an underlying mechanism in the onset and maintenance of eating disorders. Yet, it still remains unclear whether different forms of ER, adaptive and maladaptive strategies, are similar across categories of eating disorders. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to look at ER differences between anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), two common eating disorder pathologies with different eating patterns. Results: 41 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed no differences in the use of maladaptive ER strategies between individuals with AN and BN, however patients with AN tend to use less adaptive ER strategies as compared to patients with BN. Conclusions: Making less use of adaptive strategies in AN might be due to low body weight and high levels of alexithymia which define AN. In order to improve treatment outcome in individuals suffering from AN, these findings suggest to focus more on improving the use of adaptive ER strategies.
- Keywords
- Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Eating disorders, Anorexia nervosa, Bulimia nervosa, Emotion regulation, DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR-THERAPY, EATING-DISORDERS, COGNITIVE REAPPRAISAL, COPING STRATEGIES, REGULATION SCALE, BODY-COMPOSITION, SCHEMA PROCESSES, NEURAL BASES, WOMEN, SELF
Downloads
-
1-s2.0-S0010440X21000407-main.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 1.97 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8715820
- MLA
- Puttevils, Louise, et al. “Differences in the Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies between Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, vol. 109, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262.
- APA
- Puttevils, L., Vanderhasselt, M.-A., Horczak, P., & Vervaet, M. (2021). Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa : a systematic review and meta-analysis. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262
- Chicago author-date
- Puttevils, Louise, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Paula Horczak, and Myriam Vervaet. 2021. “Differences in the Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies between Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Puttevils, Louise, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Paula Horczak, and Myriam Vervaet. 2021. “Differences in the Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies between Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY 109. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262.
- Vancouver
- 1.Puttevils L, Vanderhasselt M-A, Horczak P, Vervaet M. Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa : a systematic review and meta-analysis. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY. 2021;109.
- IEEE
- [1]L. Puttevils, M.-A. Vanderhasselt, P. Horczak, and M. Vervaet, “Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa : a systematic review and meta-analysis,” COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, vol. 109, 2021.
@article{8715820, abstract = {{Objective: Research has identified abnormal emotion regulation (ER) as an underlying mechanism in the onset and maintenance of eating disorders. Yet, it still remains unclear whether different forms of ER, adaptive and maladaptive strategies, are similar across categories of eating disorders. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to look at ER differences between anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), two common eating disorder pathologies with different eating patterns. Results: 41 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed no differences in the use of maladaptive ER strategies between individuals with AN and BN, however patients with AN tend to use less adaptive ER strategies as compared to patients with BN. Conclusions: Making less use of adaptive strategies in AN might be due to low body weight and high levels of alexithymia which define AN. In order to improve treatment outcome in individuals suffering from AN, these findings suggest to focus more on improving the use of adaptive ER strategies.}}, articleno = {{152262}}, author = {{Puttevils, Louise and Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne and Horczak, Paula and Vervaet, Myriam}}, issn = {{0010-440X}}, journal = {{COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY}}, keywords = {{Clinical Psychology,Psychiatry and Mental health,Eating disorders,Anorexia nervosa,Bulimia nervosa,Emotion regulation,DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR-THERAPY,EATING-DISORDERS,COGNITIVE REAPPRAISAL,COPING STRATEGIES,REGULATION SCALE,BODY-COMPOSITION,SCHEMA PROCESSES,NEURAL BASES,WOMEN,SELF}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{17}}, title = {{Differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies between anorexia and bulimia nervosa : a systematic review and meta-analysis}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152262}}, volume = {{109}}, year = {{2021}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: