@article{8715141,
  abstract     = {{Many pregnant women use pregnancy related mHealth (PRmHealth) applications, encompassing a variety of pregnancy apps and wearables. These are mostly directed at supporting a healthier fetal development. In this article we argue that the increasing dominance of PRmHealth stands in want of empirical knowledge affirming its beneficence in terms of improved pregnancy outcomes. This is a crucial ethical issue, especially in the light of concerns about increasing pressures and growing responsibilities ascribed to pregnant women, which may, in turn, be reinforced by PRmHealth. A point can be made that it would be ethically askew if PRmHealth does not lead to improved pregnancy outcomes, while at the same time increasing maternal duties to closely monitor fetal development. We conclude that more research is needed to get a view on the benefits and burdens of PRmHealth in order to ethically assess whether the latter are proportionate to the former. If not, there is a case in saying that endorsement of PRmHealth is overdemanding.}},
  author       = {{Segers, Seppe and Mertes, Heidi and Pennings, Guido}},
  issn         = {{1386-7423}},
  journal      = {{MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY}},
  keywords     = {{Health Policy,Education,Health(social science),mHealth,Pregnancy apps,Wearables,Fetal patient,Autonomy,Moral responsibility,FETAL,SMARTPHONE,DIAGNOSIS,RISK,CARE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{677--685}},
  title        = {{An ethical exploration of pregnancy related mHealth : does it deliver?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10039-y}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: