A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation
- Author
- Retief Wessels, Jan Cosyn (UGent) , Aryan Eghbali (UGent) , Hugo De Bruyn (UGent) and Véronique Christiaens (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Background Bony concavities at the buccal aspect may cause a distortion between the implant axis and ideal prosthetic axis. Angulated implants can overcome this problem, yet long-term data are lacking. In addition, papilla-sparing incisions have been proposed to reduce tissue loss, yet aesthetic outcomes have not been published. Purpose To evaluate the 5 to 7-year outcome of single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation. Materials and Methods Patients who had been consecutively treated with a single angulated implant (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) in the anterior maxilla were re-examined after 5 to 7 years. Available data at 1 year (T1) were compared to those obtained at 5 to 7 years (T2). Results Twenty out of 22 treated patients (11 females, 9 males, mean age of 52) with 22 implants attended the 5 to 7-year reassessment. All implants survived and stable clinical conditions could be reached with mean marginal bone loss of 1.28 mm at T2. Papilla-sparing flap elevation resulted in Pink Esthetic Score of 9.83 at T1 and 8.23 at T2 (p = 0.072). Mucosal Scarring Index was 4.61 at T1 and 3.50 at T2 (p = 0.165). The overall appearance of scarring significantly improved over time (p = 0.032), yet 59% of the cases still demonstrated scarring at T2.c Conclusions Within the limitations of the study, angulated implants (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants) reached stable clinical conditions. Papilla-sparing incisions may not be recommended in aesthetically demanding patients due to high risk of scarring.
- Keywords
- Oral Surgery, General Dentistry, aesthetic zone, angulated implants, long‐, term, papilla‐, sparing flap
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 825.19 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8710071
- MLA
- Wessels, Retief, et al. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 23, no. 3, 2021, pp. 400–07, doi:10.1111/cid.12988.
- APA
- Wessels, R., Cosyn, J., Eghbali, A., De Bruyn, H., & Christiaens, V. (2021). A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 23(3), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988
- Chicago author-date
- Wessels, Retief, Jan Cosyn, Aryan Eghbali, Hugo De Bruyn, and Véronique Christiaens. 2021. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 23 (3): 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Wessels, Retief, Jan Cosyn, Aryan Eghbali, Hugo De Bruyn, and Véronique Christiaens. 2021. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 23 (3): 400–407. doi:10.1111/cid.12988.
- Vancouver
- 1.Wessels R, Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Christiaens V. A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH. 2021;23(3):400–7.
- IEEE
- [1]R. Wessels, J. Cosyn, A. Eghbali, H. De Bruyn, and V. Christiaens, “A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation,” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 400–407, 2021.
@article{8710071, abstract = {{Background Bony concavities at the buccal aspect may cause a distortion between the implant axis and ideal prosthetic axis. Angulated implants can overcome this problem, yet long-term data are lacking. In addition, papilla-sparing incisions have been proposed to reduce tissue loss, yet aesthetic outcomes have not been published. Purpose To evaluate the 5 to 7-year outcome of single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation. Materials and Methods Patients who had been consecutively treated with a single angulated implant (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) in the anterior maxilla were re-examined after 5 to 7 years. Available data at 1 year (T1) were compared to those obtained at 5 to 7 years (T2). Results Twenty out of 22 treated patients (11 females, 9 males, mean age of 52) with 22 implants attended the 5 to 7-year reassessment. All implants survived and stable clinical conditions could be reached with mean marginal bone loss of 1.28 mm at T2. Papilla-sparing flap elevation resulted in Pink Esthetic Score of 9.83 at T1 and 8.23 at T2 (p = 0.072). Mucosal Scarring Index was 4.61 at T1 and 3.50 at T2 (p = 0.165). The overall appearance of scarring significantly improved over time (p = 0.032), yet 59% of the cases still demonstrated scarring at T2.c Conclusions Within the limitations of the study, angulated implants (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants) reached stable clinical conditions. Papilla-sparing incisions may not be recommended in aesthetically demanding patients due to high risk of scarring.}}, author = {{Wessels, Retief and Cosyn, Jan and Eghbali, Aryan and De Bruyn, Hugo and Christiaens, Véronique}}, issn = {{1523-0899}}, journal = {{CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH}}, keywords = {{Oral Surgery,General Dentistry,aesthetic zone,angulated implants,long‐,term,papilla‐,sparing flap}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{400--407}}, title = {{A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2021}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: