Advanced search
1 file | 825.19 KB Add to list

A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background Bony concavities at the buccal aspect may cause a distortion between the implant axis and ideal prosthetic axis. Angulated implants can overcome this problem, yet long-term data are lacking. In addition, papilla-sparing incisions have been proposed to reduce tissue loss, yet aesthetic outcomes have not been published. Purpose To evaluate the 5 to 7-year outcome of single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation. Materials and Methods Patients who had been consecutively treated with a single angulated implant (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) in the anterior maxilla were re-examined after 5 to 7 years. Available data at 1 year (T1) were compared to those obtained at 5 to 7 years (T2). Results Twenty out of 22 treated patients (11 females, 9 males, mean age of 52) with 22 implants attended the 5 to 7-year reassessment. All implants survived and stable clinical conditions could be reached with mean marginal bone loss of 1.28 mm at T2. Papilla-sparing flap elevation resulted in Pink Esthetic Score of 9.83 at T1 and 8.23 at T2 (p = 0.072). Mucosal Scarring Index was 4.61 at T1 and 3.50 at T2 (p = 0.165). The overall appearance of scarring significantly improved over time (p = 0.032), yet 59% of the cases still demonstrated scarring at T2.c Conclusions Within the limitations of the study, angulated implants (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants) reached stable clinical conditions. Papilla-sparing incisions may not be recommended in aesthetically demanding patients due to high risk of scarring.
Keywords
Oral Surgery, General Dentistry, aesthetic zone, angulated implants, long&#8208, term, papilla&#8208, sparing flap

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 825.19 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Wessels, Retief, et al. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 23, no. 3, 2021, pp. 400–07, doi:10.1111/cid.12988.
APA
Wessels, R., Cosyn, J., Eghbali, A., De Bruyn, H., & Christiaens, V. (2021). A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 23(3), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988
Chicago author-date
Wessels, Retief, Jan Cosyn, Aryan Eghbali, Hugo De Bruyn, and Véronique Christiaens. 2021. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 23 (3): 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Wessels, Retief, Jan Cosyn, Aryan Eghbali, Hugo De Bruyn, and Véronique Christiaens. 2021. “A 5 to 7‐year Case Series on Single Angulated Implants Installed Following Papilla‐sparing Flap Elevation.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 23 (3): 400–407. doi:10.1111/cid.12988.
Vancouver
1.
Wessels R, Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Christiaens V. A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH. 2021;23(3):400–7.
IEEE
[1]
R. Wessels, J. Cosyn, A. Eghbali, H. De Bruyn, and V. Christiaens, “A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation,” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 400–407, 2021.
@article{8710071,
  abstract     = {{Background Bony concavities at the buccal aspect may cause a distortion between the implant axis and ideal prosthetic axis. Angulated implants can overcome this problem, yet long-term data are lacking. In addition, papilla-sparing incisions have been proposed to reduce tissue loss, yet aesthetic outcomes have not been published.

Purpose To evaluate the 5 to 7-year outcome of single angulated implants installed following papilla-sparing flap elevation.

Materials and Methods Patients who had been consecutively treated with a single angulated implant (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa) in the anterior maxilla were re-examined after 5 to 7 years. Available data at 1 year (T1) were compared to those obtained at 5 to 7 years (T2).

Results Twenty out of 22 treated patients (11 females, 9 males, mean age of 52) with 22 implants attended the 5 to 7-year reassessment. All implants survived and stable clinical conditions could be reached with mean marginal bone loss of 1.28 mm at T2. Papilla-sparing flap elevation resulted in Pink Esthetic Score of 9.83 at T1 and 8.23 at T2 (p = 0.072). Mucosal Scarring Index was 4.61 at T1 and 3.50 at T2 (p = 0.165). The overall appearance of scarring significantly improved over time (p = 0.032), yet 59% of the cases still demonstrated scarring at T2.c

Conclusions Within the limitations of the study, angulated implants (Co-axis (R), Southern Implants) reached stable clinical conditions. Papilla-sparing incisions may not be recommended in aesthetically demanding patients due to high risk of scarring.}},
  author       = {{Wessels, Retief and Cosyn, Jan and Eghbali, Aryan and De Bruyn, Hugo and Christiaens, Véronique}},
  issn         = {{1523-0899}},
  journal      = {{CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH}},
  keywords     = {{Oral Surgery,General Dentistry,aesthetic zone,angulated implants,long&#8208,term,papilla&#8208,sparing flap}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{400--407}},
  title        = {{A 5 to 7‐year case series on single angulated implants installed following papilla‐sparing flap elevation}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12988}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: