Advanced search
2 files | 22.67 MB Add to list

Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites

Xiaoyu Yang (UGent) , Erik Verboven (UGent) , Bing-feng Ju and Mathias Kersemans (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
The multilayer structure of fiber-reinforced polymers may be extracted by ultrasonic pulse-echo inspection. Depending on the employed ultrasonic frequency and subsequent processing methodology, different depth resolution and dynamic depth range can be achieved. This study compares the performance of different ultrasonic pulse-echo approaches for extracting the ply-by-ply structure of multilayered composites. The following methodologies are studied: Method 1: 50 MHz, 15 MHz, and 5 MHz ultrasound with low-pass filtering using analysis of the instantaneous amplitude, Method 2: 15 MHz ultrasound with Wiener deconvolution (and autoregressive spectral extrapolation) using analysis of the instantaneous amplitude, and Method 3: 5 MHz ultrasound with lowpass or log-Gabor filtering using analysis of the instantaneous phase. In the simulation study, the performance of the various techniques is investigated on synthetic data representative for a 24-ply carbon fiber reinforced polymer. The robustness of the techniques is evaluated for different signal-to-noise ratios. The various techniques are further investigated on experimental data of a 24-ply cross-ply carbon fiber reinforced polymer. The ply-byply structure is extracted and presented in the form of both B-scan and C-scan images. The thickness of each ply is estimated for quantitative analysis. The obtained results indicate that the 5 MHz ultrasound coupled to analyticsignal analysis with log-Gabor filter shows the best performance for reconstructing the multilayer structure of the studied composites.
Keywords
Mechanical Engineering, General Materials Science, Condensed Matter Physics, Ultrasonics testing, Comparative study, Deconvolution technique, Analytic-signal, Multilayer composite, Interply track, FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES, DAMAGE EVALUATION, NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, CFRP, RESOLUTION, ATTENUATION, IMPROVEMENT, WAVINESS, INPLANE, SIGNALS

Downloads

  • Accepted manuscript.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 7.92 MB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 14.75 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Yang, Xiaoyu, et al. “Comparative Study of Ultrasonic Techniques for Reconstructing the Multilayer Structure of Composites.” NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, vol. 121, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460.
APA
Yang, X., Verboven, E., Ju, B., & Kersemans, M. (2021). Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites. NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460
Chicago author-date
Yang, Xiaoyu, Erik Verboven, Bing-feng Ju, and Mathias Kersemans. 2021. “Comparative Study of Ultrasonic Techniques for Reconstructing the Multilayer Structure of Composites.” NDT & E INTERNATIONAL 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Yang, Xiaoyu, Erik Verboven, Bing-feng Ju, and Mathias Kersemans. 2021. “Comparative Study of Ultrasonic Techniques for Reconstructing the Multilayer Structure of Composites.” NDT & E INTERNATIONAL 121. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460.
Vancouver
1.
Yang X, Verboven E, Ju B, Kersemans M. Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites. NDT & E INTERNATIONAL. 2021;121.
IEEE
[1]
X. Yang, E. Verboven, B. Ju, and M. Kersemans, “Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites,” NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, vol. 121, 2021.
@article{8707700,
  abstract     = {{The multilayer structure of fiber-reinforced polymers may be extracted by ultrasonic pulse-echo inspection. Depending on the employed ultrasonic frequency and subsequent processing methodology, different depth resolution and dynamic depth range can be achieved. This study compares the performance of different ultrasonic pulse-echo approaches for extracting the ply-by-ply structure of multilayered composites. The following methodologies are studied: Method 1: 50 MHz, 15 MHz, and 5 MHz ultrasound with low-pass filtering using analysis of the instantaneous amplitude, Method 2: 15 MHz ultrasound with Wiener deconvolution (and autoregressive spectral extrapolation) using analysis of the instantaneous amplitude, and Method 3: 5 MHz ultrasound with lowpass or log-Gabor filtering using analysis of the instantaneous phase. In the simulation study, the performance of the various techniques is investigated on synthetic data representative for a 24-ply carbon fiber reinforced polymer. The robustness of the techniques is evaluated for different signal-to-noise ratios. The various techniques are further investigated on experimental data of a 24-ply cross-ply carbon fiber reinforced polymer. The ply-byply structure is extracted and presented in the form of both B-scan and C-scan images. The thickness of each ply is estimated for quantitative analysis. The obtained results indicate that the 5 MHz ultrasound coupled to analyticsignal analysis with log-Gabor filter shows the best performance for reconstructing the multilayer structure of the studied composites.}},
  articleno    = {{102460}},
  author       = {{Yang, Xiaoyu and Verboven, Erik and Ju, Bing-feng and Kersemans, Mathias}},
  issn         = {{0963-8695}},
  journal      = {{NDT & E INTERNATIONAL}},
  keywords     = {{Mechanical Engineering,General Materials Science,Condensed Matter Physics,Ultrasonics testing,Comparative study,Deconvolution technique,Analytic-signal,Multilayer composite,Interply track,FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITES,DAMAGE EVALUATION,NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION,CFRP,RESOLUTION,ATTENUATION,IMPROVEMENT,WAVINESS,INPLANE,SIGNALS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{17}},
  title        = {{Comparative study of ultrasonic techniques for reconstructing the multilayer structure of composites}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102460}},
  volume       = {{121}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: