Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 2.32 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Enterprise adaptability using a capab...

Enterprise adaptability using a capability-oriented methodology and tool support

Renata Petrevska Nechkoska (UGent) , Geert Poels (UGent) and Jelena Zdravkovic
(2018) Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2238. p.61-72
Author
Organization
Abstract
This paper investigates the differences that exist between a 3D and a 4D ontology. We examine these differences by comparing both ontologies through the metaphysical choices each ontology makes and explore the composing characteristics that define them. More specifically, the differences between the ontologies were illustrated through several modeling fragments that were derived from a modeling case presented at the 5thOntoCom workshop. Each of these modeling fragments focused on the metaphysical choices that the ontologies make –Essence and Identity, Relationships and Time. These comparisons highlighted the different ontological approaches and structures that exist between the ontologies. Moreover, depending on the ontology, the resulting conceptual model could differ substantially, confirming the impact and importance of the choice of a certain ontology. The observed differences between both ontologies eventually led us to formulate three discussion points that question the applicability of certain metaphysical choices in certain circumstances, and that can serve as a basis for future discussion or future research studies in the domain of ODCM.
Keywords
Foundational ontologies, metaphysical choices, 3D ontology, 4D ontology

Downloads

  • Download
    paper6.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.32 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Petrevska Nechkoska, Renata, et al. “Enterprise Adaptability Using a Capability-Oriented Methodology and Tool Support.” Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018, vol. 2238, CEUR, 2018, pp. 61–72.
APA
Petrevska Nechkoska, R., Poels, G., & Zdravkovic, J. (2018). Enterprise adaptability using a capability-oriented methodology and tool support. Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018, 2238, 61–72. CEUR.
Chicago author-date
Petrevska Nechkoska, Renata, Geert Poels, and Jelena Zdravkovic. 2018. “Enterprise Adaptability Using a Capability-Oriented Methodology and Tool Support.” In Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018, 2238:61–72. CEUR.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Petrevska Nechkoska, Renata, Geert Poels, and Jelena Zdravkovic. 2018. “Enterprise Adaptability Using a Capability-Oriented Methodology and Tool Support.” In Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018, 2238:61–72. CEUR.
Vancouver
1.
Petrevska Nechkoska R, Poels G, Zdravkovic J. Enterprise adaptability using a capability-oriented methodology and tool support. In: Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018. CEUR; 2018. p. 61–72.
IEEE
[1]
R. Petrevska Nechkoska, G. Poels, and J. Zdravkovic, “Enterprise adaptability using a capability-oriented methodology and tool support,” in Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018, Vienna, Austria, 2018, vol. 2238, pp. 61–72.
@inproceedings{8704515,
  abstract     = {{This paper investigates the differences that exist between a 3D and a 4D ontology. We examine these differences by comparing both ontologies through the metaphysical choices each ontology makes and explore the composing characteristics that define them. More specifically, the differences between the ontologies were illustrated through several modeling fragments that were derived from a modeling case presented at the 5thOntoCom workshop. Each of these modeling fragments focused on the metaphysical choices that the ontologies make –Essence and Identity, Relationships and Time. These comparisons highlighted the different ontological approaches and structures that exist between the ontologies. Moreover, depending on the ontology, the resulting conceptual model could differ substantially, confirming the impact and importance of the choice of a certain ontology. The observed differences between both ontologies eventually led us to formulate three discussion points that question the applicability of certain metaphysical choices in certain circumstances, and that can serve as a basis for future discussion or future research studies in the domain of ODCM.}},
  articleno    = {{6}},
  author       = {{Petrevska Nechkoska, Renata and Poels, Geert and Zdravkovic, Jelena}},
  booktitle    = {{Practicing Open Enterprise Modelling within OMiLAB 2018}},
  issn         = {{1613-0073}},
  keywords     = {{Foundational ontologies,metaphysical choices,3D ontology,4D ontology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  location     = {{Vienna, Austria}},
  pages        = {{6:61--6:72}},
  publisher    = {{CEUR}},
  title        = {{Enterprise adaptability using a capability-oriented methodology and tool support}},
  volume       = {{2238}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}