Gender, definiteness and word order in Ulağaç Cappadocian
- Author
- Mark Janse (UGent) and Eline Daveloose (UGent)
- Organization
- Project
- Abstract
- Of all the Cappadocian dialects, Ulağaç Cappadocian is considered the most ‘corrupt’ by Dawkins: “Nowhere is the vocabulary so filled with Turkish words or the syntax so Turkish” (1916: 18). Kesisoglou singles out the following as being characteristic: the loss of grammatical gender distinctions and the resulting neuterisation of nouns, including the the generalized use of the neuter article do, pl. da (1951: 4). In the case of transitive clauses this results in potential ambiguity, as nominative and accusative NPs are not distinguished morphologically. Kesisoglou quotes the following example: itó do néka do ándra-t páasen do do xorjó, which could either mean ‘that woman led her husband to the village’ or ‘that woman, her husband led her to the village’ (1951: 49). To disambiguate such cases, the article is often omitted under the second interpretation according to Kesisoglou (ibid.): itó do néka ándra-t páasen do do xorjó. Likewise, itó do peí vavá-t çórsen do ‘that child, its father saw it’ vs. itó do peí do vavá-t çórsen do ‘that child saw its father’ (ibid.). This suggests that the article is omitted in the case of subject NPs, but not in the case of object NPs (Janse 2019: 100). Upon closer scrutiny, however, it turns out that the article can only be omitted if the noun is historically masculine or feminine, but not neuter. In this paper, I investigate the use of the article in transitive clauses containing two overt NPs in connection with the word order and information structure of these clauses as means of distinguishing subject from object NPs
- Keywords
- Cappadocian, Asia Minor Greek, Byzantine Greek, Medieval Greek, Language death, Language maintenance, Modern Greek dialects, Ottoman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Population Exchange, Word Order, Definiteness, Gender
Downloads
-
Abstracts.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 11.10 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8704262
- MLA
- Janse, Mark, and Eline Daveloose. “Gender, Definiteness and Word Order in Ulağaç Cappadocian.” International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts, edited by Angela Ralli et al., University of Patras, 2021, pp. 18–18.
- APA
- Janse, M., & Daveloose, E. (2021). Gender, definiteness and word order in Ulağaç Cappadocian. In A. Ralli, B. D. Joseph, M. Janse, & M. Kisilier (Eds.), International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts (pp. 18–18). Patras: University of Patras.
- Chicago author-date
- Janse, Mark, and Eline Daveloose. 2021. “Gender, Definiteness and Word Order in Ulağaç Cappadocian.” In International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts, edited by Angela Ralli, Brian D. Joseph, Mark Janse, and Maxim Kisilier, 18–18. Patras: University of Patras.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Janse, Mark, and Eline Daveloose. 2021. “Gender, Definiteness and Word Order in Ulağaç Cappadocian.” In International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts, ed by. Angela Ralli, Brian D. Joseph, Mark Janse, and Maxim Kisilier, 18–18. Patras: University of Patras.
- Vancouver
- 1.Janse M, Daveloose E. Gender, definiteness and word order in Ulağaç Cappadocian. In: Ralli A, Joseph BD, Janse M, Kisilier M, editors. International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts. Patras: University of Patras; 2021. p. 18–18.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Janse and E. Daveloose, “Gender, definiteness and word order in Ulağaç Cappadocian,” in International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 2021, pp. 18–18.
@inproceedings{8704262,
abstract = {{Of all the Cappadocian dialects, Ulağaç Cappadocian is considered the most ‘corrupt’ by Dawkins: “Nowhere is the vocabulary so filled with Turkish words or the syntax so Turkish” (1916: 18). Kesisoglou singles out the following as being characteristic: the loss of grammatical gender distinctions and the resulting neuterisation of nouns, including the the generalized use of the neuter article do, pl. da (1951: 4). In the case of transitive clauses this results in potential ambiguity, as nominative and accusative NPs are not distinguished morphologically. Kesisoglou quotes the following example: itó do néka do ándra-t páasen do do xorjó, which could either mean ‘that woman led her husband to the village’ or ‘that woman, her husband led her to the village’ (1951: 49). To disambiguate such cases, the article is often omitted under the second interpretation according to Kesisoglou (ibid.): itó do néka ándra-t páasen do do xorjó. Likewise, itó do peí vavá-t çórsen do ‘that child, its father saw it’ vs. itó do peí do vavá-t çórsen do ‘that child saw its father’ (ibid.). This suggests that the article is omitted in the case of subject NPs, but not in the case of object NPs (Janse 2019: 100). Upon closer scrutiny, however, it turns out that the article can only be omitted if the noun is historically masculine or feminine, but not neuter. In this paper, I investigate the use of the article in transitive clauses containing two overt NPs in connection with the word order and information structure of these clauses as means of distinguishing subject from object NPs}},
author = {{Janse, Mark and Daveloose, Eline}},
booktitle = {{International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory 9, Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece, 4-5 June 2021 : Abstracts}},
editor = {{Ralli, Angela and Joseph, Brian D. and Janse, Mark and Kisilier, Maxim}},
keywords = {{Cappadocian,Asia Minor Greek,Byzantine Greek,Medieval Greek,Language death,Language maintenance,Modern Greek dialects,Ottoman Empire,Byzantine Empire,Population Exchange,Word Order,Definiteness,Gender}},
language = {{eng}},
location = {{Leonidio, Tsakonia, Greece}},
pages = {{18--18}},
publisher = {{University of Patras}},
title = {{Gender, definiteness and word order in Ulağaç Cappadocian}},
year = {{2021}},
}