Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial
- Author
- Carsten Bundt (UGent) , Nico Böhler (UGent) , Frederick Verbruggen (UGent) , Marcel Brass (UGent) and Wim Notebaert (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Action preparation is associated with a transient decrease of corticospinal excitability just before target onset. We have previously shown that the prospect of reward modulates preparatory corticospinal excitability in a Simon task. While the conflict in the Simon task strongly implicates the motor system, it is unknown whether reward prospect modulates preparatory corticospinal excitability in tasks that implicate the motor system less directly. To that effect, we examined reward-modulated preparatory corticospinal excitability in the Stroop task. We administered a rewarded cue-target delay paradigm using Stroop stimuli that afforded a left or right index finger response. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was administered over the left primary motor cortex and electromyography was obtained from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. In line with previous findings, there was a preparatory decrease in corticospinal excitability during the delay period. In contrast to our previous study using the Simon task, preparatory corticospinal excitability was not modulated by reward. Our results indicate that reward-modulated changes in the motor system depend on specific task-demands, possibly related to varying degrees of motor conflict.
- Keywords
- TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION, MOTOR SYSTEM, INHIBITORY MECHANISMS, PROPORTION CONGRUENT, TOP-DOWN, CONFLICT, TASK, INFORMATION, SUPPRESSION, ACTIVATION, conflict, congruency, motivation, primary motor cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 441.65 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8703144
- MLA
- Bundt, Carsten, et al. “Reward Does Not Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Anticipation of a Stroop Trial.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 53, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1019–28, doi:10.1111/ejn.15052.
- APA
- Bundt, C., Böhler, N., Verbruggen, F., Brass, M., & Notebaert, W. (2021). Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 53(4), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15052
- Chicago author-date
- Bundt, Carsten, Nico Böhler, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Brass, and Wim Notebaert. 2021. “Reward Does Not Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Anticipation of a Stroop Trial.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE 53 (4): 1019–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15052.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Bundt, Carsten, Nico Böhler, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Brass, and Wim Notebaert. 2021. “Reward Does Not Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Anticipation of a Stroop Trial.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE 53 (4): 1019–1028. doi:10.1111/ejn.15052.
- Vancouver
- 1.Bundt C, Böhler N, Verbruggen F, Brass M, Notebaert W. Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE. 2021;53(4):1019–28.
- IEEE
- [1]C. Bundt, N. Böhler, F. Verbruggen, M. Brass, and W. Notebaert, “Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1019–1028, 2021.
@article{8703144, abstract = {{Action preparation is associated with a transient decrease of corticospinal excitability just before target onset. We have previously shown that the prospect of reward modulates preparatory corticospinal excitability in a Simon task. While the conflict in the Simon task strongly implicates the motor system, it is unknown whether reward prospect modulates preparatory corticospinal excitability in tasks that implicate the motor system less directly. To that effect, we examined reward-modulated preparatory corticospinal excitability in the Stroop task. We administered a rewarded cue-target delay paradigm using Stroop stimuli that afforded a left or right index finger response. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was administered over the left primary motor cortex and electromyography was obtained from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. In line with previous findings, there was a preparatory decrease in corticospinal excitability during the delay period. In contrast to our previous study using the Simon task, preparatory corticospinal excitability was not modulated by reward. Our results indicate that reward-modulated changes in the motor system depend on specific task-demands, possibly related to varying degrees of motor conflict.}}, author = {{Bundt, Carsten and Böhler, Nico and Verbruggen, Frederick and Brass, Marcel and Notebaert, Wim}}, issn = {{0953-816X}}, journal = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE}}, keywords = {{TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION,MOTOR SYSTEM,INHIBITORY MECHANISMS,PROPORTION CONGRUENT,TOP-DOWN,CONFLICT,TASK,INFORMATION,SUPPRESSION,ACTIVATION,conflict,congruency,motivation,primary motor cortex,transcranial magnetic stimulation}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{1019--1028}}, title = {{Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15052}}, volume = {{53}}, year = {{2021}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: