Advanced search
1 file | 2.87 MB Add to list

A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D‐printed fractures

(2021) WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 57(4). p.1-23
Author
Organization
Abstract
Heterogeneous fracture aperture distribution, dictated by surface roughness, mechanical rock and fracture properties, and effective stress, limits the predictive capabilities of many reservoir‐scale models that commonly assume smooth fracture walls. Numerous experimental studies have probed key hydromechanical responses in single fractures; however, many are constrained by difficulties associated with sample preparation and quantitative roughness characterisation. Here, we systematically examine the effect of roughness on fluid flow properties by 3D printing seven self‐affine fractures, each with controlled roughness distributions akin to those observed in nature. Photogrammetric microscopy was employed to validate the 3D topology of each printed fracture surface, enabling quantification using traditional roughness metrics, namely the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC). Core‐flooding experiments performed on each fracture across eight incremental confining pressure increases (11 to 25 bar), shows smoother fractures (JRC < 5.5) exhibit minor permeability variation, whilst rougher fractures (JRC > 7) show as much as a 219% permeability increase. Micro‐computed tomography imaging of the roughest fracture under varying effective stresses (5 to 13.8 bar), coupled with inspection into the degree of similarity between fracture closure behaviour in 3D‐printed and natural rock fractures, highlight the capabilities of 3D‐printed materials to act as useful analogues to natural rocks. Comparison of experimental data to existing empirical aperture‐permeability models demonstrates that fracture contact area is a better permeability predictor than roughness when the mechanical aperture is below ∼20 μm. Such findings are relevant for models incorporating the effects of heterogeneous aperture structures and applied stress to predict fracture flow in the deep subsurface.
Keywords
Fracture contact area, Fracture permeability, Fracture roughness, 3D printing, Micro-computed tomography, FLUID-FLOW, ROCK FRACTURES, SURFACE-ROUGHNESS, HYDROMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR, NATURAL FRACTURES, SINGLE FRACTURE, WATER-FLOW, PERMEABILITY EVOLUTION, TRANSPORT-PROPERTIES, SHEAR DISPLACEMENT

Downloads

  • 2020WR028671.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.87 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Phillips, Tomos, et al. “A Systematic Investigation into the Control of Roughness on the Flow Properties of 3D‐printed Fractures.” WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, vol. 57, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1–23, doi:10.1029/2020wr028671.
APA
Phillips, T., Bultreys, T., Bisdom, K., Kampman, N., Van Offenwert, S., Mascini, A., … Busch, A. (2021). A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D‐printed fractures. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 57(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028671
Chicago author-date
Phillips, Tomos, Tom Bultreys, Kevin Bisdom, Niko Kampman, Stefanie Van Offenwert, Arjen Mascini, Veerle Cnudde, and Andreas Busch. 2021. “A Systematic Investigation into the Control of Roughness on the Flow Properties of 3D‐printed Fractures.” WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 57 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028671.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Phillips, Tomos, Tom Bultreys, Kevin Bisdom, Niko Kampman, Stefanie Van Offenwert, Arjen Mascini, Veerle Cnudde, and Andreas Busch. 2021. “A Systematic Investigation into the Control of Roughness on the Flow Properties of 3D‐printed Fractures.” WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 57 (4): 1–23. doi:10.1029/2020wr028671.
Vancouver
1.
Phillips T, Bultreys T, Bisdom K, Kampman N, Van Offenwert S, Mascini A, et al. A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D‐printed fractures. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 2021;57(4):1–23.
IEEE
[1]
T. Phillips et al., “A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D‐printed fractures,” WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1–23, 2021.
@article{8702958,
  abstract     = {{Heterogeneous fracture aperture distribution, dictated by surface roughness, mechanical rock and fracture properties, and effective stress, limits the predictive capabilities of many reservoir‐scale models that commonly assume smooth fracture walls. Numerous experimental studies have probed key hydromechanical responses in single fractures; however, many are constrained by difficulties associated with sample preparation and quantitative roughness characterisation. Here, we systematically examine the effect of roughness on fluid flow properties by 3D printing seven self‐affine fractures, each with controlled roughness distributions akin to those observed in nature. Photogrammetric microscopy was employed to validate the 3D topology of each printed fracture surface, enabling quantification using traditional roughness metrics, namely the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC). Core‐flooding experiments performed on each fracture across eight incremental confining pressure increases (11 to 25 bar), shows smoother fractures (JRC < 5.5) exhibit minor permeability variation, whilst rougher fractures (JRC > 7) show as much as a 219% permeability increase. Micro‐computed tomography imaging of the roughest fracture under varying effective stresses (5 to 13.8 bar), coupled with inspection into the degree of similarity between fracture closure behaviour in 3D‐printed and natural rock fractures, highlight the capabilities of 3D‐printed materials to act as useful analogues to natural rocks. Comparison of experimental data to existing empirical aperture‐permeability models demonstrates that fracture contact area is a better permeability predictor than roughness when the mechanical aperture is below ∼20 μm. Such findings are relevant for models incorporating the effects of heterogeneous aperture structures and applied stress to predict fracture flow in the deep subsurface.}},
  author       = {{Phillips, Tomos and Bultreys, Tom and Bisdom, Kevin and Kampman, Niko and Van Offenwert, Stefanie and Mascini, Arjen and Cnudde, Veerle and Busch, Andreas}},
  issn         = {{0043-1397}},
  journal      = {{WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH}},
  keywords     = {{Fracture contact area,Fracture permeability,Fracture roughness,3D printing,Micro-computed tomography,FLUID-FLOW,ROCK FRACTURES,SURFACE-ROUGHNESS,HYDROMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR,NATURAL FRACTURES,SINGLE FRACTURE,WATER-FLOW,PERMEABILITY EVOLUTION,TRANSPORT-PROPERTIES,SHEAR DISPLACEMENT}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{1--23}},
  title        = {{A systematic investigation into the control of roughness on the flow properties of 3D‐printed fractures}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028671}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: