An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : syntax and semantics
- Author
- Filip De Decker (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- In this article, I discuss the use and absence of the augment in the 3rd singular forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad. In the previous article (De Decker 2020), I explained why I chose this corpus and determined the value of the different forms. Here I proceed to the actual analysis of the forms: do they confirm the previous syntactic and semantic observations that have been made for the use and absence of the augment (the clitic rule by Drewitt and Beck, the reduction rule by Kiparsky and the distinctions: speech versus narrative, foreground versus background and remote versus recent past)?
- Keywords
- augment, Homeric Greek morpho-syntax, injunctive, textual criticism
Downloads
-
2-4a-De Decker Studia-Linguistica-137-2.pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 302.14 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8700452
- MLA
- De Decker, Filip. “An Inquiry into the Use and Meaning of the Forms Ἔθηκε(ν) and Θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : Syntax and Semantics.” STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS, vol. 137, no. 2, 2020, pp. 135–56, doi:10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443.
- APA
- De Decker, F. (2020). An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : syntax and semantics. STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS, 137(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443
- Chicago author-date
- De Decker, Filip. 2020. “An Inquiry into the Use and Meaning of the Forms Ἔθηκε(ν) and Θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : Syntax and Semantics.” STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS 137 (2): 135–56. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Decker, Filip. 2020. “An Inquiry into the Use and Meaning of the Forms Ἔθηκε(ν) and Θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : Syntax and Semantics.” STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS 137 (2): 135–156. doi:10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Decker F. An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : syntax and semantics. STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS. 2020;137(2):135–56.
- IEEE
- [1]F. De Decker, “An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : syntax and semantics,” STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 135–156, 2020.
@article{8700452,
abstract = {{In this article, I discuss the use and absence of the augment in the 3rd singular forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad. In the previous article (De Decker 2020), I explained why I chose this corpus and determined the value of the different forms. Here I proceed to the actual analysis of the forms: do they confirm the previous syntactic and semantic observations that have been made for the use and absence of the augment (the clitic rule by Drewitt and Beck, the reduction rule by Kiparsky and the distinctions: speech versus narrative, foreground versus background and remote versus recent past)?}},
author = {{De Decker, Filip}},
issn = {{1897-1059}},
journal = {{STUDIA LINGUISTICA UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE CRACOVIENSIS}},
keywords = {{augment,Homeric Greek morpho-syntax,injunctive,textual criticism}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{135--156}},
title = {{An inquiry into the use and meaning of the forms ἔθηκε(ν) and θῆκε(ν) in the Iliad : syntax and semantics}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.20.011.12443}},
volume = {{137}},
year = {{2020}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric