The Baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool
- Author
- Erik de Bakker, Mathijs Rots, Marlon Buncamper (UGent) , Frank B. Niessen, Jan Maerten Smit, Henri A. H. Winters, Mujde Ozer, Henrica C. W. de Vet and Margriet G. Mullender
- Organization
- Abstract
- Background: Breast implants are frequently used in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Capsular contracture, the most common long-term complication, is usually graded using the Baker classification. Despite its widespread use, the reliability of the Baker classification has never been established. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reliability and agreement of the Baker classification. Methods: Sixty women who had undergone cosmetic breast augmentation were included. They were examined independently by two plastic surgeons from an observer pool. The Baker score was determined, along with firmness, dislocation, symmetry, and pain using four-point scales. Patients were asked to complete the BREAST-Q postaugmentation module. The interobserver reliability and agreement were calculated for all variables with a quadratic weighted kappa. Results: The interobserver reliability of the Baker classification was poor (kappa, 0.55; 95 percent CI, 0.37 to 0.72). Interobserver reliability of the clinical parameters firmness (0.64; 95 percent CI, 0.49 to 0.79), dislocation (0.49; 95 percent CI, 0.26 to 0.73), and symmetry (0.61; 95 percent CI, 0.34 to 0.88) was also poor. Pain scores seemed more reliable (0.72; 95 percent CI, 0.56 to 0.89); however, most patients had no pain. The interobserver agreement for the Baker score was 48 percent; in 43 percent, the observers differed one category; and in 12 percent, the difference was more than one category. Conclusions: Interobserver reliability and observer agreement of the Baker classification for capsular contracture were poor. Consensus about how to adequately rate the symptoms of capsular complaints is lacking. A more reliable method of measurement or description is needed, especially for scientific research purposes, to assess the long-term problems associated with breast implants.
- Keywords
- LONG-TERM, SMOOTH
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 531.17 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8698646
- MLA
- de Bakker, Erik, et al. “The Baker Classification for Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant Surgery Is Unreliable as a Diagnostic Tool.” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, vol. 146, no. 5, 2020, pp. 956–62, doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238.
- APA
- de Bakker, E., Rots, M., Buncamper, M., Niessen, F. B., Smit, J. M., Winters, H. A. H., … Mullender, M. G. (2020). The Baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 146(5), 956–962. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238
- Chicago author-date
- Bakker, Erik de, Mathijs Rots, Marlon Buncamper, Frank B. Niessen, Jan Maerten Smit, Henri A. H. Winters, Mujde Ozer, Henrica C. W. de Vet, and Margriet G. Mullender. 2020. “The Baker Classification for Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant Surgery Is Unreliable as a Diagnostic Tool.” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 146 (5): 956–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- de Bakker, Erik, Mathijs Rots, Marlon Buncamper, Frank B. Niessen, Jan Maerten Smit, Henri A. H. Winters, Mujde Ozer, Henrica C. W. de Vet, and Margriet G. Mullender. 2020. “The Baker Classification for Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant Surgery Is Unreliable as a Diagnostic Tool.” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 146 (5): 956–962. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238.
- Vancouver
- 1.de Bakker E, Rots M, Buncamper M, Niessen FB, Smit JM, Winters HAH, et al. The Baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY. 2020;146(5):956–62.
- IEEE
- [1]E. de Bakker et al., “The Baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool,” PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 956–962, 2020.
@article{8698646, abstract = {{Background: Breast implants are frequently used in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Capsular contracture, the most common long-term complication, is usually graded using the Baker classification. Despite its widespread use, the reliability of the Baker classification has never been established. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver reliability and agreement of the Baker classification. Methods: Sixty women who had undergone cosmetic breast augmentation were included. They were examined independently by two plastic surgeons from an observer pool. The Baker score was determined, along with firmness, dislocation, symmetry, and pain using four-point scales. Patients were asked to complete the BREAST-Q postaugmentation module. The interobserver reliability and agreement were calculated for all variables with a quadratic weighted kappa. Results: The interobserver reliability of the Baker classification was poor (kappa, 0.55; 95 percent CI, 0.37 to 0.72). Interobserver reliability of the clinical parameters firmness (0.64; 95 percent CI, 0.49 to 0.79), dislocation (0.49; 95 percent CI, 0.26 to 0.73), and symmetry (0.61; 95 percent CI, 0.34 to 0.88) was also poor. Pain scores seemed more reliable (0.72; 95 percent CI, 0.56 to 0.89); however, most patients had no pain. The interobserver agreement for the Baker score was 48 percent; in 43 percent, the observers differed one category; and in 12 percent, the difference was more than one category. Conclusions: Interobserver reliability and observer agreement of the Baker classification for capsular contracture were poor. Consensus about how to adequately rate the symptoms of capsular complaints is lacking. A more reliable method of measurement or description is needed, especially for scientific research purposes, to assess the long-term problems associated with breast implants.}}, author = {{de Bakker, Erik and Rots, Mathijs and Buncamper, Marlon and Niessen, Frank B. and Smit, Jan Maerten and Winters, Henri A. H. and Ozer, Mujde and de Vet, Henrica C. W. and Mullender, Margriet G.}}, issn = {{0032-1052}}, journal = {{PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY}}, keywords = {{LONG-TERM,SMOOTH}}, language = {{eng}}, location = {{Amsterdam, Netherlands}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{956--962}}, title = {{The Baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238}}, volume = {{146}}, year = {{2020}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: