Advanced search
1 file | 6.93 MB Add to list

Mind, body, and shuttle : multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton

(2022) BIOLOGY OF SPORT. 39(1). p.79-94
Author
Organization
Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify benchmarks for anthropometric, physical performance, motor coordination, and psychological characteristics by comparing youth badminton players of different levels through the use of a multifactorial test battery. Sixty-one male participants aged 12-18 years were divided into three groups: elite (N = 10), sub-elite (N = 24), and novice (N = 27). Standard test batteries for anthropometry (including measures to estimate biological maturity), physical performance, and motor coordination were applied, as well as the modified PCDEQ2 questionnaire for psychological characteristics of youth athletes (Hill, 2016). Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) with age and biological maturity as covariates were used to investigate differences between skill levels. A discriminant analysis was used to reveal to what extent participants could be correctly assigned to their skill group. Significant differences were found in physical performance (explosive power, flexibility, speed, and endurance), BMI and motor coordination. In the psychological domain, perfectionism was found to be significantly different and elites scored highest. The discriminant analysis showed that 100% of the participants were correctly classified and 80.0% were correctly cross validated. These results significantly add to the previously limited youth players' reference values, and confirm the value of a generic, i.e. without sport-specific testing, multifactorial approach to talent identification in youth badminton.
Keywords
Youth badminton, Skill, Talent identification, Psychology, Multifactorial test battery, MOTOR COORDINATION, PERFECTIONISM, SPORT, MOTIVATION, PHYSIOLOGY, SCIENCE, STRESS, ELITE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 6.93 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Robertson-Martens, Kamasha, et al. “Mind, Body, and Shuttle : Multidimensional Benchmarks for Talent Identification in Male Youth Badminton.” BIOLOGY OF SPORT, vol. 39, no. 1, 2022, pp. 79–94, doi:10.5114/biolsport.2021.101603.
APA
Robertson-Martens, K., Laureys, F., Mostaert, M., Pion, J., Deconinck, F., & Lenoir, M. (2022). Mind, body, and shuttle : multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton. BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 39(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.101603
Chicago author-date
Robertson-Martens, Kamasha, Felien Laureys, Mireille Mostaert, Johan Pion, Frederik Deconinck, and Matthieu Lenoir. 2022. “Mind, Body, and Shuttle : Multidimensional Benchmarks for Talent Identification in Male Youth Badminton.” BIOLOGY OF SPORT 39 (1): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.101603.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Robertson-Martens, Kamasha, Felien Laureys, Mireille Mostaert, Johan Pion, Frederik Deconinck, and Matthieu Lenoir. 2022. “Mind, Body, and Shuttle : Multidimensional Benchmarks for Talent Identification in Male Youth Badminton.” BIOLOGY OF SPORT 39 (1): 79–94. doi:10.5114/biolsport.2021.101603.
Vancouver
1.
Robertson-Martens K, Laureys F, Mostaert M, Pion J, Deconinck F, Lenoir M. Mind, body, and shuttle : multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton. BIOLOGY OF SPORT. 2022;39(1):79–94.
IEEE
[1]
K. Robertson-Martens, F. Laureys, M. Mostaert, J. Pion, F. Deconinck, and M. Lenoir, “Mind, body, and shuttle : multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton,” BIOLOGY OF SPORT, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 2022.
@article{8697330,
  abstract     = {{The aim of the study was to identify benchmarks for anthropometric, physical performance, motor coordination, and psychological characteristics by comparing youth badminton players of different levels through the use of a multifactorial test battery. Sixty-one male participants aged 12-18 years were divided into three groups: elite (N = 10), sub-elite (N = 24), and novice (N = 27). Standard test batteries for anthropometry (including measures to estimate biological maturity), physical performance, and motor coordination were applied, as well as the modified PCDEQ2 questionnaire for psychological characteristics of youth athletes (Hill, 2016). Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) with age and biological maturity as covariates were used to investigate differences between skill levels. A discriminant analysis was used to reveal to what extent participants could be correctly assigned to their skill group. Significant differences were found in physical performance (explosive power, flexibility, speed, and endurance), BMI and motor coordination. In the psychological domain, perfectionism was found to be significantly different and elites scored highest. The discriminant analysis showed that 100% of the participants were correctly classified and 80.0% were correctly cross validated. These results significantly add to the previously limited youth players' reference values, and confirm the value of a generic, i.e. without sport-specific testing, multifactorial approach to talent identification in youth badminton.}},
  author       = {{Robertson-Martens, Kamasha and Laureys, Felien and Mostaert, Mireille and Pion, Johan and Deconinck, Frederik and Lenoir, Matthieu}},
  issn         = {{0860-021X}},
  journal      = {{BIOLOGY OF SPORT}},
  keywords     = {{Youth badminton,Skill,Talent identification,Psychology,Multifactorial test battery,MOTOR COORDINATION,PERFECTIONISM,SPORT,MOTIVATION,PHYSIOLOGY,SCIENCE,STRESS,ELITE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{79--94}},
  title        = {{Mind, body, and shuttle : multidimensional benchmarks for talent identification in male youth badminton}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2021.101603}},
  volume       = {{39}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: