Synthetic biology as a technoscience : the case of minimal genomes and essential genes
- Author
- Massimiliano Simons (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- This article examines how minimal genome research mobilizes philosophical concepts such as minimality and essentiality. Following a historical approach the article aims to uncover what function this terminology plays and which problems are raised by them. Specifically, four historical moments are examined, linked to the work of Harold J. Morowitz, Mitsuhiro Itaya, Eugene Koonin and Arcady Mushegian, and J. Craig Venter. What this survey shows is a historical shift away from historical questions about life or descriptive questions about specific organisms towards questions that explore biological possibilities: what are possible forms of minimal genomes, regardless of whether they exist in nature? Moreover, it highlights a fundamental ambiguity at work in minimal genome research between a universality claim and a standardization claim: does a minimal genome refer to the minimal gene set for any organism whatsoever? Or does it refer rather to a gene set that will provide stable, robust and predictable behaviour, suited for biotechnological applications? Two diagnoses are proposed for this ambiguity: a philosophical diagnosis of how minimal genome research either misunderstands the ontology of biological entities or philosophically misarticulates scientific practice. Secondly, a historical diagnosis that suggests that this ambiguity is part of a broader shift towards technoscience.
- Keywords
- Minimal genome, Essential gene, Mycoplasma, Craig Venter, Synthetic biology, Technoscience, LIFE, CELL, EVOLUTION, ORIGINS
Downloads
-
SImons M. - Synthetic biology preprint .pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 763.07 KB
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 615.74 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8696618
- MLA
- Simons, Massimiliano. “Synthetic Biology as a Technoscience : The Case of Minimal Genomes and Essential Genes.” STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol. 85, 2021, pp. 127–36, doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012.
- APA
- Simons, M. (2021). Synthetic biology as a technoscience : the case of minimal genomes and essential genes. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 85, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012
- Chicago author-date
- Simons, Massimiliano. 2021. “Synthetic Biology as a Technoscience : The Case of Minimal Genomes and Essential Genes.” STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 85: 127–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Simons, Massimiliano. 2021. “Synthetic Biology as a Technoscience : The Case of Minimal Genomes and Essential Genes.” STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 85: 127–136. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012.
- Vancouver
- 1.Simons M. Synthetic biology as a technoscience : the case of minimal genomes and essential genes. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. 2021;85:127–36.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Simons, “Synthetic biology as a technoscience : the case of minimal genomes and essential genes,” STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol. 85, pp. 127–136, 2021.
@article{8696618, abstract = {{This article examines how minimal genome research mobilizes philosophical concepts such as minimality and essentiality. Following a historical approach the article aims to uncover what function this terminology plays and which problems are raised by them. Specifically, four historical moments are examined, linked to the work of Harold J. Morowitz, Mitsuhiro Itaya, Eugene Koonin and Arcady Mushegian, and J. Craig Venter. What this survey shows is a historical shift away from historical questions about life or descriptive questions about specific organisms towards questions that explore biological possibilities: what are possible forms of minimal genomes, regardless of whether they exist in nature? Moreover, it highlights a fundamental ambiguity at work in minimal genome research between a universality claim and a standardization claim: does a minimal genome refer to the minimal gene set for any organism whatsoever? Or does it refer rather to a gene set that will provide stable, robust and predictable behaviour, suited for biotechnological applications? Two diagnoses are proposed for this ambiguity: a philosophical diagnosis of how minimal genome research either misunderstands the ontology of biological entities or philosophically misarticulates scientific practice. Secondly, a historical diagnosis that suggests that this ambiguity is part of a broader shift towards technoscience.}}, author = {{Simons, Massimiliano}}, issn = {{0039-3681}}, journal = {{STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE}}, keywords = {{Minimal genome,Essential gene,Mycoplasma,Craig Venter,Synthetic biology,Technoscience,LIFE,CELL,EVOLUTION,ORIGINS}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{127--136}}, title = {{Synthetic biology as a technoscience : the case of minimal genomes and essential genes}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012}}, volume = {{85}}, year = {{2021}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: