@article{8693368,
  abstract     = {{Information about the spatiotemporal variability of soil moisture is critical for many purposes, including monitoring of hydrologic extremes, irrigation scheduling, and prediction of agricultural yields. We evaluated the temporal dynamics of 18 state-of-the-art (quasi-)global near-surface soil moisture products, including six based on satellite retrievals, six based on models without satellite data assimilation (referred to hereafter as "open-loop" models), and six based on models that assimilate satellite soil moisture or brightness temperature data. Seven of the products are introduced for the first time in this study: one multi-sensor merged satellite product called MeMo (Merged soil Moisture) and six estimates from the HBV (Hydrologiska Byrans Vattenbalansavdelning) model with three precipitation inputs (ERA5, IMERG, and MSWEP) with and without assimilation of SMAPL3E satellite retrievals, respectively. As reference, we used in situ soil moisture measurements between 2015 and 2019 at 5 cm depth from 826 sensors, located primarily in the USA and Europe. The 3-hourly Pearson correlation (R) was chosen as the primary performance metric. We found that application of the Soil Wetness Index (SWI) smoothing filter resulted in improved performance for all satellite products. The best-to-worst performance ranking of the four single-sensor satellite products was SMAPL3E(SWI), SMOSSWI, AMSR2(SWI), and ASCAT(SWI), with the L-band-based SMAPL3ESWI (median R of 0.72) outperforming the others at 50% of the sites. Among the two multi-sensor satellite products (MeMo and ESA-CCISWI), MeMo performed better on average (median R of 0.72 versus 0.67), probably due to the inclusion of SMAPL3ESWI. The best-to-worst performance ranking of the six openloop models was HBV-MSWEP, HBV-ERA5, ERA5-Land, HBV-IMERG, VIC-PGF, and GLDAS-Noah. This ranking largely reflects the quality of the precipitation forcing. HBV-MSWEP (median R of 0.78) performed best not just among the open-loop models but among all products. The calibration of HBV improved the median R by C0 :12 on average compared to random parameters, highlighting the importance of model calibration. The best-to-worst performance ranking of the six models with satellite data assimilation was HBV-MSWEP+SMAPL3E, HBV-ERA5+SMAPL3E, GLEAM, SMAPL4, HBV-IMERG+SMAPL3E, and ERA5. The assimilation of SMAPL3E retrievals into HBV-IMERG improved the median R by C0:06, suggesting that data assimilation yields significant benefits at the global scale.}},
  author       = {{Beck, Hylke E. and Pan, Ming and Miralles, Diego and Reichle, Rolf H. and Dorigo, Wouter A. and Hahn, Sebastian and Sheffield, Justin and Karthikeyan, Lanka and Balsamo, Gianpaolo and Parinussa, Robert M. and van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. and Du, Jinyang and Kimball, John S. and Vergopolan, Noemi and Wood, Eric F.}},
  issn         = {{1027-5606}},
  journal      = {{HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES}},
  keywords     = {{GLOBAL-SCALE EVALUATION,HEIHE RIVER-BASIN,DATA ASSIMILATION,AMSR-E,RADIOFREQUENCY INTERFERENCE,AGRICULTURAL SITES,CLIMATE-CHANGE,NEAR-SURFACE,4 DECADES,SMOS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{17--40}},
  title        = {{Evaluation of 18 satellite- and model-based soil moisture products using in situ measurements from 826 sensors}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-17-2021}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: