@article{8692068,
  abstract     = {{Background: Previous studies on the effects of providing feedback about quality improvement measures to nurses show mixed results and the factors explaining the variance in effects are not yet well-understood. One of the factors that could explain the variance in outcomes is how nurses perceive the feedback. It is not the feedback per se that influences nurses, and consequently their performance, but rather the way the feedback is perceived. Objectives: This article aims to enhance our understanding of Human Resource attributions and employee engagement and burnout in a feedback environment. An in-depth study of nurses' attributions about the 'why' of feedback on quality measurements, and its relation to engagement and burnout, was performed. Design and Methods: A convergent mixed-methods, multiple case study design was used. Evidence was drawn from four comparable surgical wards within three teaching hospitals in the Netherlands that vol-unteered to participate in this study. Nurses on each ward were provided with oral and written feedback on quality measurements every two weeks, over a four month period. After this period, an online survey was distributed to all the nurses ( n = 184) on the four participating wards. Data were collected from 91 nurses. Parallel to the survey, individual, semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with eight nurses and their ward manager in each ward, resulting in interview data from 32 nurses and four ward managers. Results: Results show that nurses - both as a group and individually - make varying attributions about their managers' purpose in providing feedback on quality measurements. The feedback environment is associated to nurses' attributions and these attributions are related to nurses' burnout. Conclusions: By showing that feedback on quality measurements can be attributed differently by nurses and that the feedback environment plays a role in this, the study provides an interesting mechanism for explaining how feedback is related to performance. Implications for theory, practice and future research are discussed. (c)}},
  articleno    = {{103889}},
  author       = {{Giesbers, A. P. M. (Suzanne) and Schouteten, Roel L. J. and Poutsma, Erik and van der Heijden, Beatrice and van Achterberg, Theo}},
  issn         = {{0020-7489}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES}},
  keywords     = {{HR attributions,Feedback,Feedback environment,Quality measurement,Nursing,Hospital,EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES,MEDIATING ROLE,JOB DEMANDS,ENVIRONMENT,CARE,AUDIT,QUALITY,ORIENTATION,PERCEPTIONS,RESOURCES}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{11}},
  title        = {{Towards a better understanding of the relationship between feedback and nurses’ work engagement and burnout : a convergent mixed-methods study on nurses’ attributions about the ‘why’ of feedback}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103889}},
  volume       = {{117}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: