- Author
- Jonas Everaert (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Distorted interpretations of ambiguous information have been theorized to confer risk to experiencing depression. This article discusses recent research characterizing biased and inflexible interpretation processes to resolve ambiguous situations in depression, its underlying cognitive mechanisms, and potential pathways to depression. Future research directions are outlined to consolidate the understanding of the nature, causes, and effects of interpretation processes in depression to advance psychological treatments for this burdensome mental health condition.
- Keywords
- Depression, Interpretation bias, Interpretation inflexibility, GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER, REPETITIVE NEGATIVE THINKING, COGNITIVE BIAS MODIFICATION, EMOTION REGULATION, INFORMATION, ATTENTION, VULNERABILITY, RESOLUTION, MECHANISM, EFFICACY
Downloads
-
EveraertJ CurrentOpinionPsy.pdf
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 208.26 KB
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 227.47 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8687064
- MLA
- Everaert, Jonas. “Interpretation of Ambiguity in Depression.” CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 41, 2021, pp. 9–14, doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003.
- APA
- Everaert, J. (2021). Interpretation of ambiguity in depression. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 41, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003
- Chicago author-date
- Everaert, Jonas. 2021. “Interpretation of Ambiguity in Depression.” CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY 41: 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Everaert, Jonas. 2021. “Interpretation of Ambiguity in Depression.” CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY 41: 9–14. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003.
- Vancouver
- 1.Everaert J. Interpretation of ambiguity in depression. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY. 2021;41:9–14.
- IEEE
- [1]J. Everaert, “Interpretation of ambiguity in depression,” CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 41, pp. 9–14, 2021.
@article{8687064, abstract = {{Distorted interpretations of ambiguous information have been theorized to confer risk to experiencing depression. This article discusses recent research characterizing biased and inflexible interpretation processes to resolve ambiguous situations in depression, its underlying cognitive mechanisms, and potential pathways to depression. Future research directions are outlined to consolidate the understanding of the nature, causes, and effects of interpretation processes in depression to advance psychological treatments for this burdensome mental health condition.}}, author = {{Everaert, Jonas}}, issn = {{2352-250X}}, journal = {{CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY}}, keywords = {{Depression,Interpretation bias,Interpretation inflexibility,GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER,REPETITIVE NEGATIVE THINKING,COGNITIVE BIAS MODIFICATION,EMOTION REGULATION,INFORMATION,ATTENTION,VULNERABILITY,RESOLUTION,MECHANISM,EFFICACY}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{9--14}}, title = {{Interpretation of ambiguity in depression}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003}}, volume = {{41}}, year = {{2021}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: