Advanced search
1 file | 390.64 KB Add to list

Multi-method evidence for a dual-pathway perspective of self-regulation in loss of control over eating among adolescents

Eva Van Malderen (UGent) , Lien Goossens (UGent) , Sandra Verbeken (UGent) and Eva Kemps
(2020) APPETITE. 153.
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objective: Dual-pathway models propose that loss of control over eating (LOC) is the result of an imbalance between weaker regulatory and stronger reactive processes. However, these processes are generally captured with only one assessment method, leading to mixed findings. Additionally, it is unclear whether regulatory difficulties are generic or food-specific. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the interaction between regulatory and reactive processes in predicting the presence of LOC in adolescents, using both self-report questionnaires and behavioral tasks, and (2) to examine whether generic or food-specific regulatory processes interact with reactive processes to predict the presence of LOC. Method: A community sample of 295 adolescents (10-17 years; 67.2% girls; M = 13 years; SD = 1.99) was allocated to a LOC-Group (n = 93) or a NoLOC-Group (n = 202) based on a self-report questionnaire which assessed whether participants had experienced LOC over the past month (Children's Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire). Both self-report questionnaires and behavioral tasks were used to measure regulatory (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and go/no-go task, respectively) and reactive (Behavioral Activation Scale and dot probe task, respectively) processes. Some adolescents completed a generic go/no-go task and others a food-specific version. Binary logistic regressions were conducted with LOC as the categorical dependent variable and regulatory and reactive processes (and their interaction) as the independent variables. Results: In line with dual-pathway models, the combination of weaker regulatory and stronger reactive processes was associated with the presence of LOC. This was evident from both the self-report scales and the behavioral tasks. Preliminary results further suggest that regulatory difficulties seem to be food-specific. Conclusions: Our results provide multi-method evidence for the dual-pathway account of self-regulation in LOC among adolescents. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Keywords
Nutrition and Dietetics, General Psychology, Adolescents, Loss of control over eating, Dual-pathway perspective, Regulatory processes, Reactive processes, INHIBITORY CONTROL, ATTENTIONAL BIAS, FOOD CUES, BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, DISORDER EXAMINATION, REWARD SENSITIVITY, EFFORTFUL CONTROL, OBESE CHILDREN, MENTAL-HEALTH, BINGE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 390.64 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Malderen, Eva, et al. “Multi-Method Evidence for a Dual-Pathway Perspective of Self-Regulation in Loss of Control over Eating among Adolescents.” APPETITE, vol. 153, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104729.
APA
Van Malderen, E., Goossens, L., Verbeken, S., & Kemps, E. (2020). Multi-method evidence for a dual-pathway perspective of self-regulation in loss of control over eating among adolescents. APPETITE, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104729
Chicago author-date
Van Malderen, Eva, Lien Goossens, Sandra Verbeken, and Eva Kemps. 2020. “Multi-Method Evidence for a Dual-Pathway Perspective of Self-Regulation in Loss of Control over Eating among Adolescents.” APPETITE 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104729.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Malderen, Eva, Lien Goossens, Sandra Verbeken, and Eva Kemps. 2020. “Multi-Method Evidence for a Dual-Pathway Perspective of Self-Regulation in Loss of Control over Eating among Adolescents.” APPETITE 153. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104729.
Vancouver
1.
Van Malderen E, Goossens L, Verbeken S, Kemps E. Multi-method evidence for a dual-pathway perspective of self-regulation in loss of control over eating among adolescents. APPETITE. 2020;153.
IEEE
[1]
E. Van Malderen, L. Goossens, S. Verbeken, and E. Kemps, “Multi-method evidence for a dual-pathway perspective of self-regulation in loss of control over eating among adolescents,” APPETITE, vol. 153, 2020.
@article{8685429,
  abstract     = {{Objective: Dual-pathway models propose that loss of control over eating (LOC) is the result of an imbalance between weaker regulatory and stronger reactive processes. However, these processes are generally captured with only one assessment method, leading to mixed findings. Additionally, it is unclear whether regulatory difficulties are generic or food-specific. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the interaction between regulatory and reactive processes in predicting the presence of LOC in adolescents, using both self-report questionnaires and behavioral tasks, and (2) to examine whether generic or food-specific regulatory processes interact with reactive processes to predict the presence of LOC.

Method: A community sample of 295 adolescents (10-17 years; 67.2% girls; M = 13 years; SD = 1.99) was allocated to a LOC-Group (n = 93) or a NoLOC-Group (n = 202) based on a self-report questionnaire which assessed whether participants had experienced LOC over the past month (Children's Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire). Both self-report questionnaires and behavioral tasks were used to measure regulatory (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and go/no-go task, respectively) and reactive (Behavioral Activation Scale and dot probe task, respectively) processes. Some adolescents completed a generic go/no-go task and others a food-specific version. Binary logistic regressions were conducted with LOC as the categorical dependent variable and regulatory and reactive processes (and their interaction) as the independent variables.

Results: In line with dual-pathway models, the combination of weaker regulatory and stronger reactive processes was associated with the presence of LOC. This was evident from both the self-report scales and the behavioral tasks. Preliminary results further suggest that regulatory difficulties seem to be food-specific.

Conclusions: Our results provide multi-method evidence for the dual-pathway account of self-regulation in LOC among adolescents. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.}},
  articleno    = {{104729}},
  author       = {{Van Malderen, Eva and Goossens, Lien and Verbeken, Sandra and Kemps, Eva}},
  issn         = {{0195-6663}},
  journal      = {{APPETITE}},
  keywords     = {{Nutrition and Dietetics,General Psychology,Adolescents,Loss of control over eating,Dual-pathway perspective,Regulatory processes,Reactive processes,INHIBITORY CONTROL,ATTENTIONAL BIAS,FOOD CUES,BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION,DISORDER EXAMINATION,REWARD SENSITIVITY,EFFORTFUL CONTROL,OBESE CHILDREN,MENTAL-HEALTH,BINGE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{8}},
  title        = {{Multi-method evidence for a dual-pathway perspective of self-regulation in loss of control over eating among adolescents}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104729}},
  volume       = {{153}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: