Advanced search
2 files | 1.56 MB Add to list

The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback

Selene Nasso (UGent) , Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt (UGent) , Antonio Schettino (UGent) and Rudi De Raedt (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Whereas emotion regulation (ER) in response to distressing events is widely studied, the mechanisms underlying adaptive ER while anticipating these events are still unknown. In this study, we investigated how ER strategies and expectation influence (a) individuals’ anticipatory and online processing of self-relevant events, and (b) their affective response to them. Sixty-one healthy female participants were exposed to bogus positive and negative social feedback under reappraisal (regulation) and watch (no regulation) instructions. During the anticipatory period, participants were either expecting negative feedback or they had no expectation regarding the valence of the upcoming self-relevant feedback. Hence, negative feedback was, respectively, expected or unexpected. Participants’ affective responses were collected via self-report and electromyographic (EMG) activity over the corrugator muscle. Results showed that participants’ negative affect (based on both self-reports and EMG) was reduced by the instructions to reappraise as compared to the watch condition. Yet, such beneficial effect of reappraisal was: (a) not observed during the anticipation phase, and (b) less effective when social feedback was expected (as compared to not expected) prior to its presentation. Possibly, cognitive reappraisal might be less able to overcome the influence of negative forecasting of self-relevant negative emotional stimuli. Research findings are discussed in light of potential mechanisms underlying impaired adaptive ER in patients vulnerable for mood disorders.
Keywords
General Psychology

Downloads

  • NassoVanderhasselt SupplementaryMaterials.pdf
    • supplementary material
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 865.92 KB
  • NassoVanderhasselt Emotion 2020.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 699.02 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Nasso, Selene, et al. “The Role of Cognitive Reappraisal and Expectations in Dealing with Social Feedback.” EMOTION, 2022, doi:10.1037/emo0000825.
APA
Nasso, S., Vanderhasselt, M.-A., Schettino, A., & De Raedt, R. (2022). The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback. EMOTION. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000825
Chicago author-date
Nasso, Selene, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Antonio Schettino, and Rudi De Raedt. 2022. “The Role of Cognitive Reappraisal and Expectations in Dealing with Social Feedback.” EMOTION. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000825.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Nasso, Selene, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Antonio Schettino, and Rudi De Raedt. 2022. “The Role of Cognitive Reappraisal and Expectations in Dealing with Social Feedback.” EMOTION. doi:10.1037/emo0000825.
Vancouver
1.
Nasso S, Vanderhasselt M-A, Schettino A, De Raedt R. The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback. EMOTION. 2022;
IEEE
[1]
S. Nasso, M.-A. Vanderhasselt, A. Schettino, and R. De Raedt, “The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback,” EMOTION, 2022.
@article{8679965,
  abstract     = {{Whereas emotion regulation (ER) in response to distressing events is widely studied, the mechanisms underlying adaptive ER while anticipating these events are still unknown. In this study, we investigated how ER strategies and expectation influence (a) individuals’ anticipatory and online processing of self-relevant events, and (b) their affective response to them. Sixty-one healthy female participants were exposed to bogus positive and negative social feedback under reappraisal (regulation) and watch (no regulation) instructions. During the anticipatory period, participants were either expecting negative feedback or they had no expectation regarding the valence of the upcoming self-relevant feedback. Hence, negative feedback was, respectively, expected or unexpected. Participants’ affective responses were collected via self-report and electromyographic (EMG) activity over the corrugator muscle. Results showed that participants’ negative affect (based on both self-reports and EMG) was reduced by the instructions to reappraise as compared to the watch condition. Yet, such beneficial effect of reappraisal was: (a) not observed during the anticipation phase, and (b) less effective when social feedback was expected (as compared to not expected) prior to its presentation. Possibly, cognitive reappraisal might be less able to overcome the influence of negative forecasting of self-relevant negative emotional stimuli. Research findings are discussed in light of potential mechanisms underlying impaired adaptive ER in patients vulnerable for mood disorders.}},
  author       = {{Nasso, Selene and Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne and Schettino, Antonio and De Raedt, Rudi}},
  issn         = {{1528-3542}},
  journal      = {{EMOTION}},
  keywords     = {{General Psychology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  title        = {{The role of cognitive reappraisal and expectations in dealing with social feedback}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000825}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: