Advanced search
1 file | 1.08 MB Add to list

Balancing hospital governance : a systematic review of 15 years of empirical research

Melissa De Regge (UGent) and Kristof Eeckloo (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
It is crucial that we gain a deeper understanding of the features of organizational governance and how they contribute to hospital performance. Health care governance research has traditionally had a strong focus on the size and composition (i.e., the attributes) of the governing bodies, but less attention has been given to the dynamics, processes, and roles. Furthermore, evidence regarding the interconnection between the board and the executive management is lacking. This systematic literature review is thus intended to give a detailed summary of the attributes, the dynamics, and the processes, as well as the roles of governing bodies, by synthesizing the findings of published empirical studies. The framework of Kane et al. (2009) was used to position the results, taking into account external constraints and outputs/performance. Sixty-three studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of these studies deal with attributes (n = 34) and roles (n = 27); the smallest number of studies (n = 11) focus on dynamics and processes. There is a lack of consistency in the research findings on attributes and there is too little research into the dynamics and processes of hospital governance. However, it has been shown that clinical participation on the hospital board and the focus on quality in hospital board roles can have a beneficial effect. The studies do not provide sufficient direction on what best practice for governing hospitals should be. For this reason, we here provide a useful framework for understanding the aspects of governance and their impact on performance in hospitals and compare these with general corporate governance literature. Therefrom we propose avenues for further research.
Keywords
History and Philosophy of Science, Health(social science), Board, Executive team, Governance, Healthcare, Hospital, Systematic review, QUALITY-OF-CARE, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, HEALTH-CARE, BOARD OVERSIGHT, GOVERNING BOARDS, FOR-PROFIT, MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES, DECISION-MAKING, PERFORMANCE, DIRECTORS

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.08 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Regge, Melissa, and Kristof Eeckloo. “Balancing Hospital Governance : A Systematic Review of 15 Years of Empirical Research.” SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, vol. 262, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252.
APA
De Regge, M., & Eeckloo, K. (2020). Balancing hospital governance : a systematic review of 15 years of empirical research. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252
Chicago author-date
De Regge, Melissa, and Kristof Eeckloo. 2020. “Balancing Hospital Governance : A Systematic Review of 15 Years of Empirical Research.” SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Regge, Melissa, and Kristof Eeckloo. 2020. “Balancing Hospital Governance : A Systematic Review of 15 Years of Empirical Research.” SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE 262. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252.
Vancouver
1.
De Regge M, Eeckloo K. Balancing hospital governance : a systematic review of 15 years of empirical research. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE. 2020;262.
IEEE
[1]
M. De Regge and K. Eeckloo, “Balancing hospital governance : a systematic review of 15 years of empirical research,” SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, vol. 262, 2020.
@article{8677961,
  abstract     = {{It is crucial that we gain a deeper understanding of the features of organizational governance and how they contribute to hospital performance. Health care governance research has traditionally had a strong focus on the size and composition (i.e., the attributes) of the governing bodies, but less attention has been given to the dynamics, processes, and roles. Furthermore, evidence regarding the interconnection between the board and the executive management is lacking. This systematic literature review is thus intended to give a detailed summary of the attributes, the dynamics, and the processes, as well as the roles of governing bodies, by synthesizing the findings of published empirical studies. The framework of Kane et al. (2009) was used to position the results, taking into account external constraints and outputs/performance. Sixty-three studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of these studies deal with attributes (n = 34) and roles (n = 27); the smallest number of studies (n = 11) focus on dynamics and processes. There is a lack of consistency in the research findings on attributes and there is too little research into the dynamics and processes of hospital governance. However, it has been shown that clinical participation on the hospital board and the focus on quality in hospital board roles can have a beneficial effect. The studies do not provide sufficient direction on what best practice for governing hospitals should be. For this reason, we here provide a useful framework for understanding the aspects of governance and their impact on performance in hospitals and compare these with general corporate governance literature. Therefrom we propose avenues for further research.}},
  articleno    = {{113252}},
  author       = {{De Regge, Melissa and Eeckloo, Kristof}},
  issn         = {{0277-9536}},
  journal      = {{SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE}},
  keywords     = {{History and Philosophy of Science,Health(social science),Board,Executive team,Governance,Healthcare,Hospital,Systematic review,QUALITY-OF-CARE,CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,HEALTH-CARE,BOARD OVERSIGHT,GOVERNING BOARDS,FOR-PROFIT,MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES,DECISION-MAKING,PERFORMANCE,DIRECTORS}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{14}},
  title        = {{Balancing hospital governance : a systematic review of 15 years of empirical research}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113252}},
  volume       = {{262}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: