Advanced search
Add to list

Autonomy and dying : notes about decision-making and 'completed life' euthanasia in the Netherlands

(2021) DEATH STUDIES. 45(8). p.613-622
Author
Organization
Abstract
Euthanasia in the Netherlands is based on the notion that the person seeking assistance to die is able to make an autonomous decision. The objective of this study is to explore this notion, in particular, in the case of “tiredness of life.” The article is mainly based on two qualitative researches and two selected case histories that provide an in-depth insight into the complex process of (not) reaching a clear decision. We found three obstacles that cast doubt over autonomous decision-making in the face of death: (1) Doctors – not patients – have the final say in “measuring” the “amount” of pain and suffering that entitles a person to be granted euthanasia. (2) Human decisions are always taken in a context of complex circumstances involving relatives, friends, and medical professionals. Decisions may therefore be changed, mitigated, or not taken at all. (3) People lose much of their autonomy when they grow old and fragile, and will be increasingly inclined or forced to leave decisions to others.
Keywords
END

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
van der Geest, Sjaak, and Priya Pramod Satalkar. “Autonomy and Dying : Notes about Decision-Making and ‘completed Life’ Euthanasia in the Netherlands.” DEATH STUDIES, vol. 45, no. 8, 2021, pp. 613–22, doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1671543.
APA
van der Geest, S., & Satalkar, P. P. (2021). Autonomy and dying : notes about decision-making and “completed life” euthanasia in the Netherlands. DEATH STUDIES, 45(8), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1671543
Chicago author-date
Geest, Sjaak van der, and Priya Pramod Satalkar. 2021. “Autonomy and Dying : Notes about Decision-Making and ‘completed Life’ Euthanasia in the Netherlands.” DEATH STUDIES 45 (8): 613–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1671543.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
van der Geest, Sjaak, and Priya Pramod Satalkar. 2021. “Autonomy and Dying : Notes about Decision-Making and ‘completed Life’ Euthanasia in the Netherlands.” DEATH STUDIES 45 (8): 613–622. doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1671543.
Vancouver
1.
van der Geest S, Satalkar PP. Autonomy and dying : notes about decision-making and “completed life” euthanasia in the Netherlands. DEATH STUDIES. 2021;45(8):613–22.
IEEE
[1]
S. van der Geest and P. P. Satalkar, “Autonomy and dying : notes about decision-making and ‘completed life’ euthanasia in the Netherlands,” DEATH STUDIES, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 613–622, 2021.
@article{8676865,
  abstract     = {{Euthanasia in the Netherlands is based on the notion that the person seeking assistance to die is able to make an autonomous decision. The objective of this study is to explore this notion, in particular, in the case of “tiredness of life.” The article is mainly based on two qualitative researches and two selected case histories that provide an in-depth insight into the complex process of (not) reaching a clear decision. We found three obstacles that cast doubt over autonomous decision-making in the face of death: (1) Doctors – not patients – have the final say in “measuring” the “amount” of pain and suffering that entitles a person to be granted euthanasia. (2) Human decisions are always taken in a context of complex circumstances involving relatives, friends, and medical professionals. Decisions may therefore be changed, mitigated, or not taken at all. (3) People lose much of their autonomy when they grow old and fragile, and will be increasingly inclined or forced to leave decisions to others.}},
  author       = {{van der Geest, Sjaak and Satalkar, Priya Pramod}},
  issn         = {{0748-1187}},
  journal      = {{DEATH STUDIES}},
  keywords     = {{END}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{613--622}},
  title        = {{Autonomy and dying : notes about decision-making and 'completed life' euthanasia in the Netherlands}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1671543}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: