Advanced search
1 file | 2.49 MB Add to list

Stroke survivors' perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke

(2022) DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION. 44(3). p.382-394
Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose:Sedentary behaviour is any waking behaviour in sitting, lying or reclining postures with low energy expenditure. High sedentary behaviour levels, common after stroke, are associated with poor health and higher levels of mobility disability. The aim of this study was to undertake a behavioural diagnosis of sedentary behaviour in the early phase after stroke to inform interventions that may reduce sedentary behaviour and associated disability. Methods and materials:Independently mobile stroke survivors were interviewed three months after stroke. The topic guide was informed by the central layer of the Behaviour Change Wheel to explore three components: capability, opportunity and motivation. This model recognises that behaviour is the consequence of an interacting system of these components. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using The Framework Method. Results:Thirty one people were interviewed (66.7 years; 16 male). The perception of diminished capability to reduce sedentary behaviour due to physical tiredness/fatigue, and pain/discomfort acting as both a motivator and inhibitor to movement, were discussed. Environmental barriers and the importance of social interaction were highlighted. Perceived motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour was influenced by enjoyment of sedentary behaviours, fear of falling and habitual nature of sedentary behaviours. Conclusions:This information will inform evidence-based sedentary behaviour interventions after stroke.
Keywords
HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, POSTSTROKE FATIGUE, TIME, ASSOCIATION, DEPRESSION, STATEMENT, BARRIERS, SCALE, Stroke, sedentary behaviour, COM-B, behaviour change, qualitative, sitting

Downloads

  • 2020 fitzsimons Stroke survivors perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.49 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Fitzsimons, Claire, et al. “Stroke Survivors’ Perceptions of Their Sedentary Behaviours Three Months after Stroke.” DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, vol. 44, no. 3, 2022, pp. 382–94, doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1768304.
APA
Fitzsimons, C., Nicholson, S., Morris, J., Mead, G., Chastin, S., & Niven, A. (2022). Stroke survivors’ perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 44(3), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1768304
Chicago author-date
Fitzsimons, Claire, Sarah Nicholson, Jacqui Morris, Gillian Mead, Sebastien Chastin, and Ailsa Niven. 2022. “Stroke Survivors’ Perceptions of Their Sedentary Behaviours Three Months after Stroke.” DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION 44 (3): 382–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1768304.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Fitzsimons, Claire, Sarah Nicholson, Jacqui Morris, Gillian Mead, Sebastien Chastin, and Ailsa Niven. 2022. “Stroke Survivors’ Perceptions of Their Sedentary Behaviours Three Months after Stroke.” DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION 44 (3): 382–394. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1768304.
Vancouver
1.
Fitzsimons C, Nicholson S, Morris J, Mead G, Chastin S, Niven A. Stroke survivors’ perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION. 2022;44(3):382–94.
IEEE
[1]
C. Fitzsimons, S. Nicholson, J. Morris, G. Mead, S. Chastin, and A. Niven, “Stroke survivors’ perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke,” DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 382–394, 2022.
@article{8675475,
  abstract     = {{Purpose:Sedentary behaviour is any waking behaviour in sitting, lying or reclining postures with low energy expenditure. High sedentary behaviour levels, common after stroke, are associated with poor health and higher levels of mobility disability. The aim of this study was to undertake a behavioural diagnosis of sedentary behaviour in the early phase after stroke to inform interventions that may reduce sedentary behaviour and associated disability. Methods and materials:Independently mobile stroke survivors were interviewed three months after stroke. The topic guide was informed by the central layer of the Behaviour Change Wheel to explore three components: capability, opportunity and motivation. This model recognises that behaviour is the consequence of an interacting system of these components. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using The Framework Method. Results:Thirty one people were interviewed (66.7 years; 16 male). The perception of diminished capability to reduce sedentary behaviour due to physical tiredness/fatigue, and pain/discomfort acting as both a motivator and inhibitor to movement, were discussed. Environmental barriers and the importance of social interaction were highlighted. Perceived motivation to reduce sedentary behaviour was influenced by enjoyment of sedentary behaviours, fear of falling and habitual nature of sedentary behaviours. Conclusions:This information will inform evidence-based sedentary behaviour interventions after stroke.}},
  author       = {{Fitzsimons, Claire and Nicholson, Sarah and Morris, Jacqui and Mead, Gillian and Chastin, Sebastien and Niven, Ailsa}},
  issn         = {{0963-8288}},
  journal      = {{DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION}},
  keywords     = {{HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS,PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY,QUALITATIVE RESEARCH,POSTSTROKE FATIGUE,TIME,ASSOCIATION,DEPRESSION,STATEMENT,BARRIERS,SCALE,Stroke,sedentary behaviour,COM-B,behaviour change,qualitative,sitting}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{382--394}},
  title        = {{Stroke survivors' perceptions of their sedentary behaviours three months after stroke}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1768304}},
  volume       = {{44}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: