Advanced search
1 file | 2.02 MB Add to list
Author
Organization
Abstract
Enabling data reuse and knowledge discovery is increasingly critical in modern science, and requires an effort towards standardising data publication practices. This is particularly challenging in the plant phenotyping domain, due to its complexity and heterogeneity. We have produced the MIAPPE 1.1 release, which enhances the existing MIAPPE standard in coverage, to support perennial plants, in structure, through an explicit data model, and in clarity, through definitions and examples. We evaluated MIAPPE 1.1 by using it to express several heterogeneous phenotyping experiments in a range of different formats, to demonstrate its applicability and the interoperability between the various implementations. Furthermore, the extended coverage is demonstrated by the fact that one of the datasets could not have been described under MIAPPE 1.0. MIAPPE 1.1 marks a major step towards enabling plant phenotyping data reusability, thanks to its extended coverage, and especially the formalisation of its data model, which facilitates its implementation in different formats. Community feedback has been critical to this development, and will be a key part of ensuring adoption of the standard.
Keywords
Plant Science, Physiology, findability, interoperability, metadata, phenomics, plant phenotyping, reusability, standards, MINIMUM INFORMATION, STANDARDS, ONTOLOGIES, VOCABULARY, REPOSITORY

Downloads

  • Papoutsoglou et al. 2020 New Phytologist 227 260.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.02 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Papoutsoglou, Evangelia A., et al. “Enabling Reusability of Plant Phenomic Datasets with MIAPPE 1.1.” NEW PHYTOLOGIST, vol. 227, no. 1, 2020, pp. 260–73, doi:10.1111/nph.16544.
APA
Papoutsoglou, E. A., Faria, D., Arend, D., Arnaud, E., Athanasiadis, I. N., Chaves, I., … Pommier, C. (2020). Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 227(1), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16544
Chicago author-date
Papoutsoglou, Evangelia A., Daniel Faria, Daniel Arend, Elizabeth Arnaud, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, Inês Chaves, Frederik Coppens, et al. 2020. “Enabling Reusability of Plant Phenomic Datasets with MIAPPE 1.1.” NEW PHYTOLOGIST 227 (1): 260–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16544.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Papoutsoglou, Evangelia A., Daniel Faria, Daniel Arend, Elizabeth Arnaud, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis, Inês Chaves, Frederik Coppens, Guillaume Cornut, Bruno V. Costa, Hanna Cwiek-Kupczynska, Bert Droesbeke, Richard Finkers, Kristina Gruden, Astrid Junker, Graham J. King, Paweł Krajewski, Matthias Lange, Marie‐Angélique Laporte, Célia Michotey, Markus Oppermann, Richard Ostler, Hendrik Poorter, Ricardo Ramirez-Gonzalez, Živa Ramsak, Jochen C. Reif, Philippe Rocca‐Serra, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone, Uwe Scholz, François Tardieu, Cristobal Uauy, Björn Usadel, Richard G. F. Visser, Stephan Weise, Paul J. Kersey, Célia M. Miguel, Anne‐Françoise Adam‐Blondon, and Cyril Pommier. 2020. “Enabling Reusability of Plant Phenomic Datasets with MIAPPE 1.1.” NEW PHYTOLOGIST 227 (1): 260–273. doi:10.1111/nph.16544.
Vancouver
1.
Papoutsoglou EA, Faria D, Arend D, Arnaud E, Athanasiadis IN, Chaves I, et al. Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1. NEW PHYTOLOGIST. 2020;227(1):260–73.
IEEE
[1]
E. A. Papoutsoglou et al., “Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1,” NEW PHYTOLOGIST, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 260–273, 2020.
@article{8660331,
  abstract     = {{Enabling data reuse and knowledge discovery is increasingly critical in modern science, and requires an effort towards standardising data publication practices. This is particularly challenging in the plant phenotyping domain, due to its complexity and heterogeneity.
We have produced the MIAPPE 1.1 release, which enhances the existing MIAPPE standard in coverage, to support perennial plants, in structure, through an explicit data model, and in clarity, through definitions and examples.
We evaluated MIAPPE 1.1 by using it to express several heterogeneous phenotyping experiments in a range of different formats, to demonstrate its applicability and the interoperability between the various implementations. Furthermore, the extended coverage is demonstrated by the fact that one of the datasets could not have been described under MIAPPE 1.0.
MIAPPE 1.1 marks a major step towards enabling plant phenotyping data reusability, thanks to its extended coverage, and especially the formalisation of its data model, which facilitates its implementation in different formats. Community feedback has been critical to this development, and will be a key part of ensuring adoption of the standard.}},
  author       = {{Papoutsoglou, Evangelia A. and Faria, Daniel and Arend, Daniel and Arnaud, Elizabeth and Athanasiadis, Ioannis N. and Chaves, Inês and Coppens, Frederik and Cornut, Guillaume and Costa, Bruno V. and Cwiek-Kupczynska, Hanna and Droesbeke, Bert and Finkers, Richard and Gruden, Kristina and Junker, Astrid and King, Graham J. and Krajewski, Paweł and Lange, Matthias and Laporte, Marie‐Angélique and Michotey, Célia and Oppermann, Markus and Ostler, Richard and Poorter, Hendrik and Ramirez-Gonzalez, Ricardo and Ramsak, Živa and Reif, Jochen C. and Rocca‐Serra, Philippe and Sansone, Susanna‐Assunta and Scholz, Uwe and Tardieu, François and Uauy, Cristobal and Usadel, Björn and Visser, Richard G. F. and Weise, Stephan and Kersey, Paul J. and Miguel, Célia M. and Adam‐Blondon, Anne‐Françoise and Pommier, Cyril}},
  issn         = {{0028-646X}},
  journal      = {{NEW PHYTOLOGIST}},
  keywords     = {{Plant Science,Physiology,findability,interoperability,metadata,phenomics,plant phenotyping,reusability,standards,MINIMUM INFORMATION,STANDARDS,ONTOLOGIES,VOCABULARY,REPOSITORY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{260--273}},
  title        = {{Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16544}},
  volume       = {{227}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: