Advanced search
1 file | 1.03 MB Add to list

Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review

(2017) EUROPEAN UROLOGY. 72(2). p.205-217
Author
Organization
Keywords
Minimally invasive surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Robotic-assisted surgery, Open surgery, Kidney transplant recipients, SURGICAL SITE INFECTION, PROLONGED WARM ISCHEMIA, LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY, RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION, RISK-FACTORS, WOUND COMPLICATIONS, GRAFT FUNCTION, SKIN INCISION, TIME, SURVIVAL

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.03 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Wagenaar, Sven, et al. “Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Techniques versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY, vol. 72, no. 2, 2017, pp. 205–17.
APA
Wagenaar, S., Nederhoed, J. H., Hoksbergen, A. W. J., Bonjer, H. J., Wisselink, W., & van Ramshorst, G. (2017). Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 72(2), 205–217.
Chicago author-date
Wagenaar, Sven, Johanna H. Nederhoed, Arjan W. J. Hoksbergen, H. Jaap Bonjer, Willem Wisselink, and G van Ramshorst. 2017. “Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Techniques versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY 72 (2): 205–17.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Wagenaar, Sven, Johanna H. Nederhoed, Arjan W. J. Hoksbergen, H. Jaap Bonjer, Willem Wisselink, and G van Ramshorst. 2017. “Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Techniques versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN UROLOGY 72 (2): 205–217.
Vancouver
1.
Wagenaar S, Nederhoed JH, Hoksbergen AWJ, Bonjer HJ, Wisselink W, van Ramshorst G. Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review. EUROPEAN UROLOGY. 2017;72(2):205–17.
IEEE
[1]
S. Wagenaar, J. H. Nederhoed, A. W. J. Hoksbergen, H. J. Bonjer, W. Wisselink, and G. van Ramshorst, “Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review,” EUROPEAN UROLOGY, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 205–217, 2017.
@article{8658593,
  author       = {Wagenaar, Sven and Nederhoed, Johanna H. and Hoksbergen, Arjan W. J. and Bonjer, H. Jaap and Wisselink, Willem and van Ramshorst, G},
  issn         = {0302-2838},
  journal      = {EUROPEAN UROLOGY},
  keywords     = {Minimally invasive surgery,Laparoscopic surgery,Robotic-assisted surgery,Open surgery,Kidney transplant recipients,SURGICAL SITE INFECTION,PROLONGED WARM ISCHEMIA,LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY,RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION,RISK-FACTORS,WOUND COMPLICATIONS,GRAFT FUNCTION,SKIN INCISION,TIME,SURVIVAL},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {205--217},
  title        = {Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients : a systematic review},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.020},
  volume       = {72},
  year         = {2017},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: