Advanced search
1 file | 3.60 MB Add to list

Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials : a possible biomarker of effective nerve activation

Author
Organization
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is associated with laryngeal muscle activation and induces voice modifications, well-known side effects of the therapy resulting from co-activation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In this study, we describe the non-invasive transcutaneous recording of laryngeal motor evoked potentials (LMEPs), which could serve as a biomarker of effective nerve activation and individual titration in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We recruited drug-resistant epileptic patients treated for at least 6 months with a VNS. Trains of 600-1200 VNS pulses were delivered with increasing current outputs. We placed six skin electrodes on the ventral surface of the neck, in order to record LMEPs whenever the laryngeal muscular threshold was reached. We studied the internal consistency and the variability of LMEP recordings, and compared different methods for amplitude calculation. Recruitment curves were built based on the stimulus-response relationship. We also determined the electrical axis of the LMEPs dipole in order to define the optimal electrode placement for LMEPs recording in a clinical setting. LMEPs were successfully recorded in 11/11 patients. The LMEPs threshold ranged from 0.25 to 1 mA (median 0.50 mA), and onset latency was between 5.37 and 8.77 ms. The signal-to-noise ratio was outstanding in 10/11 patients. In these cases, excellent reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.90 across three different amplitude measurements) was achieved with 10 sample averages. Moreover, our recordings showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95 for 10 epochs). Area-under-the-curve and peak-to-peak measurement proved to be complementary methods for amplitude calculation. Finally, we determined that an optimal derivation requires only two recording electrodes, aligned on a horizontal axis around the laryngeal prominence. In conclusion, we describe here an optimal methodology for the recording of VNS-induced motor evoked responses from the larynx. Although further clinical validation is still necessary, LMEPs might be useful as a non-invasive marker of effective nerve activation, and as an aid for the clinician to perform a more rational titration of VNS parameters.
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), epilepsy, biomarkers, larynx, motor evoked potentials, internal consistency, reliability, electrical axis, INTERNAL CONSISTENCY, REFRACTORY EPILEPSY, LONG-TERM, RELIABILITY, EXCITABILITY, COEFFICIENTS, SEIZURES, THERAPY, NUMBER, MUSCLE

Downloads

  • published.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 3.60 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vespa, Simone, et al. “Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials : A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 13, 2019, doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00880.
APA
Vespa, S., Stumpp, L., Bouckaert, C., Delbeke, J., Smets, H., Cury, J., … El Tahry, R. (2019). Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials : a possible biomarker of effective nerve activation. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00880
Chicago author-date
Vespa, Simone, Lars Stumpp, Charlotte Bouckaert, Jean Delbeke, Hugo Smets, Joaquin Cury, Susana Ferrao Santos, et al. 2019. “Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials : A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00880.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vespa, Simone, Lars Stumpp, Charlotte Bouckaert, Jean Delbeke, Hugo Smets, Joaquin Cury, Susana Ferrao Santos, Herbert Rooijakkers, Antoine Nonclercq, Robrecht Raedt, Kristl Vonck, and Riëm El Tahry. 2019. “Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials : A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation.” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 13. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00880.
Vancouver
1.
Vespa S, Stumpp L, Bouckaert C, Delbeke J, Smets H, Cury J, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials : a possible biomarker of effective nerve activation. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE. 2019;13.
IEEE
[1]
S. Vespa et al., “Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials : a possible biomarker of effective nerve activation,” FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 13, 2019.
@article{8655091,
  abstract     = {{Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is associated with laryngeal muscle activation and induces voice modifications, well-known side effects of the therapy resulting from co-activation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In this study, we describe the non-invasive transcutaneous recording of laryngeal motor evoked potentials (LMEPs), which could serve as a biomarker of effective nerve activation and individual titration in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We recruited drug-resistant epileptic patients treated for at least 6 months with a VNS. Trains of 600-1200 VNS pulses were delivered with increasing current outputs. We placed six skin electrodes on the ventral surface of the neck, in order to record LMEPs whenever the laryngeal muscular threshold was reached. We studied the internal consistency and the variability of LMEP recordings, and compared different methods for amplitude calculation. Recruitment curves were built based on the stimulus-response relationship. We also determined the electrical axis of the LMEPs dipole in order to define the optimal electrode placement for LMEPs recording in a clinical setting. LMEPs were successfully recorded in 11/11 patients. The LMEPs threshold ranged from 0.25 to 1 mA (median 0.50 mA), and onset latency was between 5.37 and 8.77 ms. The signal-to-noise ratio was outstanding in 10/11 patients. In these cases, excellent reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.90 across three different amplitude measurements) was achieved with 10 sample averages. Moreover, our recordings showed very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.95 for 10 epochs). Area-under-the-curve and peak-to-peak measurement proved to be complementary methods for amplitude calculation. Finally, we determined that an optimal derivation requires only two recording electrodes, aligned on a horizontal axis around the laryngeal prominence. In conclusion, we describe here an optimal methodology for the recording of VNS-induced motor evoked responses from the larynx. Although further clinical validation is still necessary, LMEPs might be useful as a non-invasive marker of effective nerve activation, and as an aid for the clinician to perform a more rational titration of VNS parameters.}},
  articleno    = {{880}},
  author       = {{Vespa, Simone and Stumpp, Lars and Bouckaert, Charlotte and Delbeke, Jean and Smets, Hugo and Cury, Joaquin and Ferrao Santos, Susana and Rooijakkers, Herbert and Nonclercq, Antoine and Raedt, Robrecht and Vonck, Kristl and El Tahry, Riëm}},
  issn         = {{1662-453X}},
  journal      = {{FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE}},
  keywords     = {{vagus nerve stimulation (VNS),epilepsy,biomarkers,larynx,motor evoked potentials,internal consistency,reliability,electrical axis,INTERNAL CONSISTENCY,REFRACTORY EPILEPSY,LONG-TERM,RELIABILITY,EXCITABILITY,COEFFICIENTS,SEIZURES,THERAPY,NUMBER,MUSCLE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{13}},
  title        = {{Vagus nerve stimulation-induced laryngeal motor evoked potentials : a possible biomarker of effective nerve activation}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00880}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: