Advanced search
2 files | 1.28 MB Add to list
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objectives:The aim of the study was to assess differences in the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) by European pediatric (PG) and adult gastroenterologists (AG), and their self-reported adherence to guidelines. Methods:A multiple-choice questionnaire gauged the diagnostic and management strategies of gastroenterologists treating children or adults in 14 European countries and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Results:Questionnaires were completed by 465 PG and 743 AG. PG were significantly more likely to take biopsies in patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (86.2% PG vs 75.4% AG, P<0.001) and to perform endoscopic follow-up (86.3% PG vs 80.6% AG, P<0.001). After failure of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), topical steroids were the preferred second-line therapy; however, PG opted more frequently for elimination diets (47.5% PG vs 13.7% AG, P<0.001). More PG than AG indicated having read recent guidelines (89.4% PG vs 58.2% AG, P<0.001). Geographic differences in practice were reported, with respondents from the United Kingdom, Portugal, and Spain more often adhering to recommended biopsy protocols. Physicians in the UAE, France, Lithuania, and Poland tended to opt for steroid therapy or elimination diets as first-line therapy, in contrast to most other countries. Conclusions:Significant differences in general practice between PG and AG were demonstrated with notable divergence from consensus guidelines. International practice variations are also apparent. Among other strategies, educational activities to highlight current recommendations may help harmonize and optimize clinical practice.
Keywords
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Gastroenterology, adult, diagnosis, esophagitis, pediatric, treatment, CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS, GUIDELINES, DIAGNOSIS, CHILDREN, ADULTS, GASTROENTEROLOGISTS, VARIABILITY, EOE

Downloads

  • Differences in Management of Eosinophilic.96158.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 522.00 KB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 762.96 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Tourlamain, Gilles, et al. “Differences in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Europe : An Assessment of Current Practice.” JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, vol. 71, no. 1, 2020, pp. 83–90, doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000002672.
APA
Tourlamain, G., Garcia-Puig, R., Gutiérrez-Junquera, C., Papadopoulou, A., Roma, E., Kalach, N., … Vande Velde, S. (2020). Differences in management of eosinophilic esophagitis in Europe : an assessment of current practice. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 71(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000002672
Chicago author-date
Tourlamain, Gilles, Roger Garcia-Puig, Carolina Gutiérrez-Junquera, Alexandra Papadopoulou, Eleftheria Roma, Nicolas Kalach, Johanna Oudshoorn, et al. 2020. “Differences in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Europe : An Assessment of Current Practice.” JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION 71 (1): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000002672.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Tourlamain, Gilles, Roger Garcia-Puig, Carolina Gutiérrez-Junquera, Alexandra Papadopoulou, Eleftheria Roma, Nicolas Kalach, Johanna Oudshoorn, Christiane Sokollik, Kasia Karolewska-Bochenek, Salvatore Oliva, Caterina Strisciuglio, Olivia Bauraind, Marcus Karl-Heinz Auth, Mike Thomson, Sebastian Otte, Orel Rok, Jorge Amil Dias, Christos Tzivinikos, Vaidotas Urbonas, Aco Kostovski, Noam Zevit, and Saskia Vande Velde. 2020. “Differences in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Europe : An Assessment of Current Practice.” JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION 71 (1): 83–90. doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000002672.
Vancouver
1.
Tourlamain G, Garcia-Puig R, Gutiérrez-Junquera C, Papadopoulou A, Roma E, Kalach N, et al. Differences in management of eosinophilic esophagitis in Europe : an assessment of current practice. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION. 2020;71(1):83–90.
IEEE
[1]
G. Tourlamain et al., “Differences in management of eosinophilic esophagitis in Europe : an assessment of current practice,” JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2020.
@article{8654873,
  abstract     = {{Objectives:The aim of the study was to assess differences in the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) by European pediatric (PG) and adult gastroenterologists (AG), and their self-reported adherence to guidelines.

Methods:A multiple-choice questionnaire gauged the diagnostic and management strategies of gastroenterologists treating children or adults in 14 European countries and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Results:Questionnaires were completed by 465 PG and 743 AG. PG were significantly more likely to take biopsies in patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (86.2% PG vs 75.4% AG, P<0.001) and to perform endoscopic follow-up (86.3% PG vs 80.6% AG, P<0.001). After failure of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), topical steroids were the preferred second-line therapy; however, PG opted more frequently for elimination diets (47.5% PG vs 13.7% AG, P<0.001). More PG than AG indicated having read recent guidelines (89.4% PG vs 58.2% AG, P<0.001). Geographic differences in practice were reported, with respondents from the United Kingdom, Portugal, and Spain more often adhering to recommended biopsy protocols. Physicians in the UAE, France, Lithuania, and Poland tended to opt for steroid therapy or elimination diets as first-line therapy, in contrast to most other countries.

Conclusions:Significant differences in general practice between PG and AG were demonstrated with notable divergence from consensus guidelines. International practice variations are also apparent. Among other strategies, educational activities to highlight current recommendations may help harmonize and optimize clinical practice.}},
  author       = {{Tourlamain, Gilles and Garcia-Puig, Roger and Gutiérrez-Junquera, Carolina and Papadopoulou, Alexandra and Roma, Eleftheria and Kalach, Nicolas and Oudshoorn, Johanna and Sokollik, Christiane and Karolewska-Bochenek, Kasia and Oliva, Salvatore and Strisciuglio, Caterina and Bauraind, Olivia and Auth, Marcus Karl-Heinz and Thomson, Mike and Otte, Sebastian and Rok, Orel and Dias, Jorge Amil and Tzivinikos, Christos and Urbonas, Vaidotas and Kostovski, Aco and Zevit, Noam and Vande Velde, Saskia}},
  issn         = {{0277-2116}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION}},
  keywords     = {{Pediatrics,Perinatology,and Child Health,Gastroenterology,adult,diagnosis,esophagitis,pediatric,treatment,CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS,GUIDELINES,DIAGNOSIS,CHILDREN,ADULTS,GASTROENTEROLOGISTS,VARIABILITY,EOE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{83--90}},
  title        = {{Differences in management of eosinophilic esophagitis in Europe : an assessment of current practice}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000002672}},
  volume       = {{71}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: